Literature DB >> 25516150

The Blooming Anatomy Tool (BAT): A discipline-specific rubric for utilizing Bloom's taxonomy in the design and evaluation of assessments in the anatomical sciences.

Andrew R Thompson1, Valerie D O'Loughlin2.   

Abstract

Bloom's taxonomy is a resource commonly used to assess the cognitive level associated with course assignments and examination questions. Although widely utilized in educational research, Bloom's taxonomy has received limited attention as an analytical tool in the anatomical sciences. Building on previous research, the Blooming Anatomy Tool (BAT) was developed. This rubric provides discipline-specific guidelines to Blooming anatomy multiple-choice questions (MCQs). To test the efficacy of the BAT, a group of volunteers were randomly split up and asked to Bloom a series of anatomy MCQs using either the BAT or a traditional Bloom's reference called Bloom's Learning Objectives (BLO). Both groups utilized each rubric for a different series of MCQs. Examination question categorizations made using each rubric were tested for accuracy and interrater reliability. In addition, previous experience in anatomy and Bloom's taxonomy were considered. Results demonstrated that volunteers using the BAT had consistently higher levels of interrater reliability, but accuracy varied and was similar between rubrics. Neither measure was substantially impacted by experience in Bloom's taxonomy or anatomy. A poststudy survey indicated that volunteers strongly preferred the BAT and felt it was more helpful in categorizing anatomy MCQs than the BLO. These results suggest that the BAT can be useful in educational research in the anatomical sciences to aid in aligning observer judgment on Bloom taxonomic levels and improve consistency, especially when used in conjunction with a norming session prior to data collection.
© 2014 American Association of Anatomists.

Keywords:  Bloom's taxonomy; assessments; cognitive skills; gross anatomy education; learning objectives; multiple choice questions

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25516150     DOI: 10.1002/ase.1507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Sci Educ        ISSN: 1935-9772            Impact factor:   5.958


  8 in total

1.  The practical examination types (spot test and slide test) of gross anatomy course in faculty of medicine: a simultaneous evaluation of the aspect of student success.

Authors:  Kemal Emre Özen; Kübra Erdoğan; Burhan Yarar; Gizem Çizmeci; Gonca Ay Keselik; Ferhan Elmalı; Mehmet Ali Malas
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Development of a Virtual Three-Dimensional Assessment Scenario for Anatomical Education.

Authors:  Katerina Bogomolova; Amir H Sam; Adam T Misky; Chinmay M Gupte; Paul H Strutton; Thomas J Hurkxkens; Beerend P Hierck
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  The influence of anatomy app use on chiropractic students' learning outcomes: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Amanda J Meyer; Norman J Stomski; C Dominique Losco; Anthony J Armson
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2016-12-01

Review 4.  Evolutionary Science as a Method to Facilitate Higher Level Thinking and Reasoning in Medical Training.

Authors:  Joseph L Graves; Chris Reiber; Anna Thanukos; Magdalena Hurtado; Terry Wolpaw
Journal:  Evol Med Public Health       Date:  2016-10-15

5.  Musculoskeletal anatomy: evaluation and comparison of common teaching and learning modalities.

Authors:  Aristeidis Zibis; Vasileios Mitrousias; Sokratis Varitimidis; Vasileios Raoulis; Apostolos Fyllos; Dimitrios Arvanitis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Development and evaluation of an online integrative histology module: simple design, low-cost, and improves pathology self-efficacy.

Authors:  Daniel T Schoenherr; Mary O Dereski; Kurt D Bernacki; Said Khayyata; Stefanie M Attardi
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2022-12

7.  Stereoscopic three-dimensional visualisation technology in anatomy learning: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Katerina Bogomolova; Beerend P Hierck; Agnes E M Looijen; Johanne N M Pilon; Hein Putter; Bruce Wainman; Steven E R Hovius; Jos A van der Hage
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 6.251

8.  Responding to Covid-19: A thematic analysis of students' perspectives on modified learning activities during an emergency transition to remote human anatomy education.

Authors:  Sean C McWatt
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 5.958

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.