Literature DB >> 25514519

Real-time MEG neurofeedback training of posterior alpha activity modulates subsequent visual detection performance.

Yuka O Okazaki1, Jörn M Horschig2, Lisa Luther3, Robert Oostenveld4, Ikuya Murakami5, Ole Jensen6.   

Abstract

It has been demonstrated that alpha activity is lateralized when attention is directed to the left or right visual hemifield. We investigated whether real-time neurofeedback training of the alpha lateralization enhances participants' ability to modulate posterior alpha lateralization and causes subsequent short-term changes in visual detection performance. The experiment consisted of three phases: (i) pre-training assessment, (ii) neurofeedback phase and (iii) post-training assessment. In the pre- and post-training phases we measured the threshold to covertly detect a cued faint Gabor stimulus presented in the left or right hemifield. During magnetoencephalography (MEG) neurofeedback, two face stimuli superimposed with noise were presented bilaterally. Participants were cued to attend to one of the hemifields. The transparency of the superimposed noise and thus the visibility of the stimuli were varied according to the momentary degree of hemispheric alpha lateralization. In a double-blind procedure half of the participants were provided with sham feedback. We found that hemispheric alpha lateralization increased with the neurofeedback training; this was mainly driven by an ipsilateral alpha increase. Surprisingly, comparing pre- to post-training, detection performance decreased for a Gabor stimulus presented in the hemifield that was un-attended during neurofeedback. This effect was not observed in the sham group. Thus, neurofeedback training alters alpha lateralization, which in turn decreases performances in the untrained hemifield. Our findings suggest that alpha oscillations play a causal role for the allocation of attention. Furthermore, our neurofeedback protocol serves to reduce the detection of unattended visual information and could therefore be of potential use for training to reduce distractibility in attention deficit patients, but also highlights that neurofeedback paradigms can have negative impact on behavioral performance and should be applied with caution.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alpha lateralization; Attention; Brain computer interface (BCI); Magnetoencephalography (MEG); Neurofeedback; Plasticity

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25514519     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  22 in total

Review 1.  Magnetoencephalography for brain electrophysiology and imaging.

Authors:  Sylvain Baillet
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Learning in brain-computer interface control evidenced by joint decomposition of brain and behavior.

Authors:  Jennifer Stiso; Marie-Constance Corsi; Jean M Vettel; Javier Garcia; Fabio Pasqualetti; Fabrizio De Vico Fallani; Timothy H Lucas; Danielle S Bassett
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Is Alpha Asymmetry a Byproduct or Cause of Spatial Attention? New Evidence Alpha Neurofeedback Controls Measures of Spatial Attention.

Authors:  Stephanie R Jones; Danielle D Sliva
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Control freaks: Towards optimal selection of control conditions for fMRI neurofeedback studies.

Authors:  Bettina Sorger; Frank Scharnowski; David E J Linden; Michelle Hampson; Kymberly D Young
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Defining the Neural Substrate of the Adult Outcome of Childhood ADHD: A Multimodal Neuroimaging Study of Response Inhibition.

Authors:  Eszter Szekely; Gustavo P Sudre; Wendy Sharp; Ellen Leibenluft; Philip Shaw
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 18.112

Review 6.  Neurofeedback Therapy for Enhancing Visual Attention: State-of-the-Art and Challenges.

Authors:  Mehdi Ordikhani-Seyedlar; Mikhail A Lebedev; Helge B D Sorensen; Sadasivan Puthusserypady
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Behavioral and Cortical Effects during Attention Driven Brain-Computer Interface Operations in Spatial Neglect: A Feasibility Case Study.

Authors:  Luca Tonin; Marco Pitteri; Robert Leeb; Huaijian Zhang; Emanuele Menegatti; Francesco Piccione; José Del R Millán
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Increased Alpha-Rhythm Dynamic Range Promotes Recovery from Visuospatial Neglect: A Neurofeedback Study.

Authors:  Tomas Ros; Abele Michela; Anne Bellman; Philippe Vuadens; Arnaud Saj; Patrik Vuilleumier
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 3.599

9.  Invasive vs. Non-Invasive Neuronal Signals for Brain-Machine Interfaces: Will One Prevail?

Authors:  Stephan Waldert
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Peripheral Attentional Targets under Covert Attention Lead to Paradoxically Enhanced Alpha Desynchronization in Neurofibromatosis Type 1.

Authors:  Gilberto Silva; Maria J Ribeiro; Gabriel N Costa; Inês Violante; Fabiana Ramos; Jorge Saraiva; Miguel Castelo-Branco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.