| Literature DB >> 25514235 |
Lu Gan1, Wei-Dan Jiang2, Pei Wu2, Yang Liu2, Jun Jiang2, Shu-Hong Li1, Ling Tang3, Sheng-Yao Kuang3, Lin Feng2, Xiao-Qiu Zhou2.
Abstract
The present study explored the impact of dietary isoleucine (Ile) on fish growth and flesh quality and revealed a possible role of muscle antioxidant defense in flesh quality in relation to dietary Ile. Grass carp (weighing 256.8±3.5 g) were fed diets containing six graded levels of Ile (3.8, 6.6, 9.3, 12.5, 15.2 and 18.5 g/kg) for eight weeks. The results indicated that compared with Ile deficiency (3.8 g/kg diets) and excess (18.5 g/kg diets) groups, 9.3-15.2 g Ile/kg diet supplementations promoted fish growth and muscle fat deposition, whereas 6.6-15.2 g Ile/kg diets supplementation enhanced muscle nutrients (protein and total EAAs) deposition. Furthermore, muscle shear force, pH value, and hydroxyproline concentration were improved by 9.3-12.5, 9.3 and 9.3 g Ile/kg diet supplementations, respectively. However, muscle cooking loss, lactate content, and activities of cathepsin B and L were decreased by 6.6-15.2, 9.3-12.5, 9.3-12.5 and 9.3-15.2 g Ile/kg diet supplementations, respectively. Additionally, 6.6-15.2 and 6.6-12.5 g Ile/kg diet supplementations attenuated malondialdehyde and protein carbonyl contents, respectively. The activities of copper/zinc superoxide dismutase (Cu/Zn-SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and glutathione content were enhanced by 6.6-9.3, 6.6-12.5 and 6.6-15.2 g Ile/kg diet supplementations, respectively. Moreover, the relative mRNA expressions of antioxidant enzymes, including Cu/Zn-SOD (6.6-12.5 g/kg diets) and GPx (12.5 g/kg diets), as well as antioxidant-related signaling molecules, including NF-E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) (6.6-12.5 g/kg diets), target of rapamycin (6.6-12.5 g/kg diets), ribosomal S6 protein kinase 1 (9.3-12.5 g/kg diets) and casein kinase 2 (6.6-12.5 g/kg diets), were up-regulated when Ile diet supplementations were administered at these levels, respectively, whereas the relative mRNA expression of Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 was down-regulated with 9.3 g Ile/kg diet supplementations. Collectively, the present study indicated that optimum isoleucine improved flesh quality, partly due to the activation of antioxidant defense through the Nrf2 signaling pathway.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25514235 PMCID: PMC4267783 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115129
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
The composition and nutrient content of the basal diet.
| Ingredients | g/kg | Nutrient content | g/kg |
| Fish meal | 78.0 | Crude protein | 309.6 |
| Casein | 30.0 | Crude lipid | 49.2 |
| Gelatin | 39.9 | Available phosphorus | 6.0 |
| Crystalline AA mix | 154.8 | n-3 | 10.0 |
| Isoleucine premix | 50.0 | n-6 | 10.0 |
| Glycine premix | 80.0 | ||
| α-starch | 280.0 | ||
| Corn starch | 87.2 | ||
| Fish oil | 22.0 | ||
| Soybean oil | 18.9 | ||
| Vitamin premix | 10.0 | ||
| Trace mineral premix | 20.0 | ||
| Ca (H2PO4)2 | 22.7 | ||
| Choline chloride (500 g/kg) | 6.0 | ||
| Microcrystalline cellulose | 100.0 | ||
| Ethoxyquin (300 g/kg) | 0.5 |
Crude protein and crude lipid contents were measured value. Available phosphorus, n-3 and n-6 contents were calculated value.
Amino acid mix (g/kg): lysine, 17.13 g; methionine, 7.78 g; tryptophan, 3.57 g; threonine 11.88 g; arginine, 12.89 g; histidine, 7.96 g; leucine, 20.51 g; phenylalanine, 13.60 g; valine, 15.33 g; cystine, 0.91 g; tyrosine, 10.86 g; glutamic acid, 32.32 g.
L-isoleucine was added to obtain graded levels of isoleucine. Per kilogram of isoleucine premix composition from diet 1 to 6 was as follows (g/kg): L-isoleucine 0.00, 60.86, 121.71, 182.57, 243.42, 304.28 g and corn starch 1000.00, 939.14, 878.29, 817.43, 756.58, 695.72, respectively.
Glycine premix: Each mixture was made isonitrogenous with the addition of reduced amounts of glycine and compensated with appropriate amounts of corn starch. Per kilogram of glycine premix composition from diet 1 to 6 was as follows (g/kg): 720.96, 699.49, 678.03, 656.57, 635.10, 613.64 g and corn starch 279.04, 300.51, 321.97, 343.43, 364.90, 386.36 g, respectively.
Per kg of vitamin premix (g/kg): retinyl acetate (500 000 IU/g), 0.80 g; cholecalciferol (500 000 IU/g), 0.48 g; DL-α-tocopherol acetate (500 g/kg), 20.00 g; menadione (230 g/kg), 0.22 g; cyanocobalamin (10 g/kg), 0.10 g; D-biotin (20 g/kg), 5.00 g; folic acid (960 g/kg), 0.52 g; thiamine hydrochloride (980 g/kg), 0.12 g; ascorhyl acetate (930 g/kg), 7.16 g; niacin (990 g/kg), 2.58 g; meso-inositol (990 g/kg), 52.33 g; calcium-D-pantothenate (900 g/kg), 2.78 g; riboflavin (800 g/kg), 0.99 g; pyridoxine hydrochloride (980 g/kg), 0.62 g. All ingredients were diluted with corn starch to 1 kg.
Per kg of trace mineral premix (g/kg): FeSO4.H2O, 25.00 g; CuSO4.5H2O, 0.60 g; ZnSO4.H2O, 4.35 g; MnSO4.H2O, 2.04 g; KI, 1.10 g; NaSeO3, 2.50 g; MgSO4.H2O, 230.67 g. All ingredients were diluted with corn starch to 1 kg.
Forward (F) and reverse (R) primers used for quantitative PCR, including amplicon length and annealing temperature.
| Gene | Description | Primer | Annealing temperature (°C) | Genbank accession no. |
|
| copper/zinc superoxide dismutase | F: CGCACTTCAACCCTTACA R: | 61.5 | GU901214 |
|
| Catalase | F: AAGTTCTACACCGATGAGG R: | 58.7 | FJ560431 |
|
| Glutathione peroxidase | F: GGGCTGGTTATTCTGGGC R: | 61.5 | EU828796 |
|
| Glutamate-cysteine ligase | F: CACGCTGCCAGAATACAA R: | 56.9 | KF998103 |
|
| NF-E2-related factor 2 | F: CTGGACGAGGAGACTGGA R: | 62.5 | KF733814 |
|
| Helch-like ECH-associated protein 1 | F: TTCCACGCCCTCCTCAA R: | 63.0 | KF811013 |
|
| Target of rapamycin | F: TCCCACTTTCCACCAACT R: | 61.4 | JX854449 |
|
| Ribosomal S 6 protein kinase1 | F: TGGAGGAGGTAATGGACG R: | 54.0 | EF373673 |
|
| Casein kinase 2 | F: CCCCAACCACAGTGACCT R: | 57.9 | KF914143 |
|
| F: GGCTGTGCTGTCCCTGTA R: | 61.4 | M25013 |
Treatment effects on growth performance factors, plasma ammonia content (µmol/L) and muscle proximate composition (%) of grass carp.
| Dietary isoleucine levels (g/kg diet) | ||||||
| 3.8 | 6.6 | 9.3 | 12.5 | 15.2 | 18.5 | |
| IBW | 255.7±4.5a | 253.4±5.1a | 257.1±2.3a | 258.9±2.4a | 257.3±1.8a | 258.4±3.7a |
| FBW | 374.4±4.0a | 476.5±6.7b | 606.4±11.1d | 660.8±18.3e | 549.6±8.7c | 492.5±8.0b |
| PWG | 46.42±1.15a | 88.11±4.62b | 135.93±6.47d | 155.24±8.50e | 113.59±4.01c | 90.65±5.23b |
| SGR | 0.681±0.014a | 1.128±0.044b | 1.532±0.049d | 1.673±0.060e | 1.355±0.034c | 1.152±0.049b |
| FI | 282.6±1.1a | 368.5±3.5b | 586.5±0.7f | 563.4±1.1e | 488.2±0.9d | 418.3±1.0c |
| FE | 41.99±0.37a | 60.57±2.79b | 59.56±2.24b | 71.33±3.35c | 59.86±1.79 b | 55.97±2.55b |
| PER | 1.356±0.012a | 1.956±0.090c | 1.924±0.072bc | 2.304±0.108d | 1.934±0.058bc | 1.808±0.082b |
| PAC | 532.6±21.5f | 297.4±16.1c | 221.3±20.2a | 249.4±18.2b | 332.4±23.5d | 359.9±22.8e |
| Moisture | 76.99±1.62b | 76.68±0.78ab | 76.02±0.72ab | 75.65±0.68a | 75.93±0.64ab | 76.73±0.64ab |
| Protein | 17.21±0.43a | 18.18±0.66b | 18.53±0.55bc | 18.97±0.45c | 18.82±0.57bc | 17.24±0.72a |
| Lipid | 2.472±0.303ab | 2.686±0.162bc | 2.788±0.107c | 3.079±0.123d | 2.875±0.252cd | 2.289±0.067a |
| Regression | ||||||
| YPWG = −1.414× | R2 = 0.921 |
| ||||
| YSGR = −0.013× | R2 = 0.949 |
| ||||
| YFI = −4.054× | R2 = 0.863 |
| ||||
| YFE = −0.320× | R2 = 0.822 |
| ||||
| YPER = −0.010× | R2 = 0.823 |
| ||||
| YPAC = 3.970× | R2 = 0.827 |
| ||||
| Ymoisture = 0.020× | R2 = 0.893 |
| ||||
| Yprotein = −0.031× | R2 = 0.930 |
| ||||
| Ylipid = −0.011× | R2 = 0.841 |
| ||||
Mean values of triplicate groups, with thirty fish in each group. And mean values within the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (P<0.05).
Values are means ± SD (n = 6), and mean values within the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (P<0.05).
IBW: initial body weight (g/fish); FBW: final body weight (g/fish); PWG: percentage weight gain (%); SGR: specific growth rate (%/day); FI: feed intake (g/fish); FE: feed efficiency (%); PER: protein efficiency ratio; PAC: plasma ammonia content.
weight gain (WG) = FBW (g)–IBW (g);
PWG = 100×WG (g)/IBW (g);
SGR = 100×[ln FBW (g)-ln IBW (g)]/number of days;
FE = 100×weight gain (g)/feed intake (g);
PER = wet weight gain (g)/protein intake (g).
Figure 1Quadratic regression analysis of PWG for grass carp fed graded levels of Ile.
PWG, percentage weight gain.
Treatment effects on amino acid composition (% Dry Weight) in grass carp muscle.
| Dietary isoleucine levels (g/kg diet) | ||||||
| 3.8 | 6.6 | 9.3 | 12.5 | 15.2 | 18.5 | |
| Ile | 3.25±0.01a | 3.27±0.02a | 3.29±0.01a | 3.43±0.02b | 3.46±0.02bc | 3.50±0.03c |
| Asp | 7.66±0.01a | 7.96±0.04b | 7.87±0.03b | 7.95±0.03b | 7.97±0.05b | 7.62±0.06a |
| Thr | 3.46±0.03a | 3.63±0.03b | 3.58±0.07b | 3.63±0.03b | 3.57±0.01b | 3.43±0.03a |
| Ser | 3.26±0.01a | 3.42±0.03b | 3.44±0.06b | 3.45±0.01b | 3.40±0.06b | 3.20±0.02a |
| Glu | 13.84±0.12a | 14.54±0.14b | 14.37±0.03b | 14.50±0.03b | 14.49±0.12b | 13.80±0.06a |
| Gly | 3.80±0.06ab | 4.01±0.02bc | 4.18±0.01c | 4.05±0.01c | 4.06±0.22c | 3.76±0.04a |
| Ala | 4.44±0.14a | 4.72±0.01c | 4.56±0.07b | 4.67±0.01ab | 4.66±0.04ab | 4.37±0.01a |
| Val | 3.68±21.5a | 3.71±0.16a | 3.59±0.02a | 3.72±0.05a | 3.71±0.08a | 3.57±0.10a |
| Cys | 0.50±0.04a | 0.49±0.05a | 0.53±0.01a | 0.45±0.09a | 0.51±0.03a | 0.40±0.07a |
| Met | 2.20±0.03ab | 2.30±0.03c | 2.28±0.03bc | 2.28±0.06bc | 2.24±0.02bc | 2.13±0.04a |
| Leu | 6.17±0.04a | 6.47±0.08b | 6.38±0.01b | 6.49±0.03b | 6.41±0.01b | 6.19±0.05a |
| Tyr | 2.80±0.05a | 3.00±0.09c | 2.93±0.04bc | 2.99±0.03c | 2.95±0.02c | 2.82±0.03ab |
| Phe | 3.16±0.08a | 3.32±0.13a | 3.20±0.02a | 3.33±0.03a | 3.28±0.08a | 3.14±0.05a |
| Lys | 6.80±0.22ab | 7.03±0.23bc | 7.10±0.12bc | 7.04±0.04bc | 7.30±0.17c | 6.56±0.06a |
| His | 1.63±0.03a | 1.84±0.05a | 2.02±0.32a | 1.82±0.04a | 1.86±0.22a | 1.60±0.07a |
| Arg | 5.16±0.33a | 5.21±0.07a | 5.14±0.05a | 5.20±0.16a | 5.15±0.02a | 5.41±0.34a |
| Total EAA | 35.51±0.28a | 36.78±0.11b | 36.57±0.39b | 36.94±0.18b | 36.98±0.56b | 35.55±0.35a |
Values are means ± SD (n = 6), and mean values within the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (P<0.05).
Treatment effects on muscle cooking loss (%), shear force (N), hydroxyproline content (µg/mg wet tissue), pH value, cathepsin activities (U/g muscle) and lactate content (mmol/g protein) in grass carp.
| Dietary isoleucine levels (g/kg diet) | ||||||
| 3.8 | 6.6 | 9.3 | 12.5 | 15.2 | 18.5 | |
| Cooking loss | 15.09±1.22c | 13.87±1.25b | 12.62±0.81a | 12.20±0.98a | 13.20±0.30ab | 15.42±0.66c |
| Shear force | 1.855±0.119ab | 1.958±0.098bc | 2.232±0.156d | 2.022±0.152c | 1.972±0.123bc | 1.723±0.118a |
| Hydroxyproline | 0.240±0.021bc | 0.247±0.022c | 0.327±0.012d | 0.263±0.022c | 0.222±0.017ab | 0.203±0.016a |
| pH | 5.992±0.028a | 6.045±0.034bc | 6.080±0.029c | 6.050±0.053bc | 6.035±0.040abc | 6.033±0.019ab |
| Cathepsin B | 5.923±0.642b | 5.445±0.479b | 4.420±0.385a | 4.697±0.518a | 5.644±0.545b | 5.838±0.502b |
| Cathepsin L | 1.218±0.130b | 1.138±0.121b | 0.991±0.100a | 1.000±0.091a | 1.093±0.100ab | 1.114±0.083b |
| Lactate | 4.146±0.355d | 3.829±0.228c | 2.269±0.169a | 2.476±0.216a | 3.504±0.245b | 3.950±0.274cd |
| Regression | ||||||
| Ycooking loss = 0.115×2−3.108x+33.402 | R2 = 0.854 |
| ||||
| Yshear force = −0.006×2+0.13x+1.440 | R2 = 0.830 |
| ||||
| YpH = −0.001×2+0.023x+5.930 | R2 = 0.684 |
| ||||
| Ycathepsin B = 0.023×2−0.499x+7.501 | R2 = 0.738 |
| ||||
| Ycathepsin L = 0.003×2−0.073x+1.456 | R2 = 0.824 |
| ||||
| YLactate = 0.029×2−0.66x+6.385 | R2 = 0.745 |
| ||||
Values are means ± SD (n = 6), and mean values within the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (P<0.05).
Figure 2Quadratic regression analysis of muscle cooking loss for grass carp fed graded levels of Ile.
Treatment effects on protein carbonyl (PC, nmol/mg protein), malondialdehyde (MDA, nmol/mg protein), anti-superoxide anion (ASA, U/g protein), anti-hydroxyl radical (a-HR, U/mg protein), copper/zinc superoxide dismutase (Cu/Zn-SOD, U/mg protein), glutathione peroxidase (GPx, U/mg protein), catalase (CAT, U/mg protein) activities and glutathione (GSH, mg/g protein) content in grass carp muscle.
| Dietary isoleucine levels (g/kg diet) | ||||||
| 3.8 | 6.6 | 9.3 | 12.5 | 15.2 | 18.5 | |
| PC | 8.27±0.83d | 4.40±0.52b | 2.26±0.25a | 4.47±0.50b | 4.95±0.66bc | 5.18±0.38c |
| MDA | 1.54±0.12d | 0.92±0.09c | 0.60±0.06b | 0.61±0.04b | 0.36±0.04a | 1.63±0.16d |
| ASA | 29.71±1.99c | 33.91±3.79d | 30.42±1.27c | 25.75±1.59b | 18.95±0.63a | 19.65±1.08a |
| a-HR | 419.8±28.9c | 415.0±21.5c | 446.4±11.1d | 381.7±11.6b | 292.9±8.0a | 297.5±29.3a |
| Cu/Zn-SOD | 4.24±0.30b | 5.43±0.53c | 5.65±0.41c | 4.12±0.37b | 3.58±0.31a | 3.31±0.20a |
| GPx | 99.5±4.8a | 113.5±8.6b | 135.1±9.9c | 119.4±10.2b | 102.7±9.6a | 97.9±7.3a |
| CAT | 1.76±0.16d | 1.37±0.13c | 1.13±0.10b | 0.97±0.07a | 1.11±0.10b | 1.19±0.08b |
| GSH | 3.02±0.21a | 5.99±0.56c | 7.36±0.61d | 7.94±0.65e | 6.06±0.51c | 4.49±0.17b |
| Regression | ||||||
| YPC = 0.063×2−1.498x+12.264 | R2 = 0.667 |
| ||||
| YMDA = 0.021×2−0.469x+3.087 | R2 = 0.859 |
| ||||
| YASA = −0.053×2+0.194x+31.923 | R2 = 0.815 |
| ||||
| Ya-HR = −0.784×2+7.220x+410.426 | R2 = 0.810 |
| ||||
| YCu/Zn-SOD = −0.020×2+0.325x+3.710 | R2 = 0.683 |
| ||||
| YGPx = −0.493×2+10.376x+69.181 | R2 = 0.709 |
| ||||
| YCAT = 0.008×2−0.217x+2.457 | R2 = 0.976 |
| ||||
| YGSH = −0.074×2+1.711x−2.261 | R2 = 0.958 |
| ||||
Values are means ± SD (n = 6), and mean values within the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (P<0.05).
Figure 3Effects of dietary Ile on Cu/Zn-SOD, GPx, CAT and GCL expression in grass carp muscle.
Values are means with standard deviations represented by vertical bars (n = 6). Different letter above bars indicated significant difference among treatments (P<0.05). Cu/Zn-SOD, copper/zinc superoxide dismutase; GPx, glutathione peroxidase; CAT, catalase; GCL, glutamate-cysteine ligase.
Figure 6Effects of dietary Ile on CK2 expression in grass carp muscle.
Values are means with standard deviations represented by vertical bars (n = 6). Different letter above bars indicated significant difference among treatments (P<0.05). CK2, casein kinase 2.
Figure 4Effects of dietary Ile on Nrf2 and Keap1 expression in grass carp muscle.
Values are means with standard deviations represented by vertical bars (n = 6). Different letter above bars indicated significant difference among treatments (P<0.05). Nrf2, NF-E2-related factor 2; Keap1, Kelch-like- ECH-associated protein 1.
Figure 5Effects of dietary Ile on TOR and S6K1 expression in grass carp muscle.
Values are means with standard deviations represented by vertical bars (n = 6). Different letter above bars indicated significant difference among treatments (P<0.05). TOR, target of rapamycin; S6K1, ribosomal S6 protein kinase 1.
Correlation coefficients between shear force, cooking loss and cathepsin B and L activities, hydroxyproline, Glu contents in grass carp muscle.
| shear force |
| cooking loss |
| |
| Cathepsin B | −0.876 | <0.05 | +0.854 | <0.05 |
| Cathepsin L | −0.704 | 0.118 | +0.828 | <0.05 |
| Hydroxyproline | +0.920 | <0.01 | 0.655 | 0.158 |
| Glu | +0.685 | 0.134 | nd | nd |
nd = correlation not-determined.
Correlation coefficients between shear force, cooking loss and malondialdehyde (MDA), protein carbonyl (PC), anti-superoxide anion (ASA), anti-hydroxy radical (a-HR) activities, glutathione (GSH) content, copper/zinc superoxide dismutase (Cu/Zn-SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activities in grass carp muscle.
| shear force |
| cooking loss |
| |
| MDA | −0.769 | 0.074 | +0.915 | <0.05 |
| PC | −0.703 | 0.119 | +0.672 | 0.143 |
| GSH | +0.749 | 0.086 | −0.932 | <0.01 |
| Cu/Zn-SOD | +0.718 | 0.108 | −0.389 | 0.446 |
| GPx | +0.923 | <0.01 | −0.773 | 0.071 |