Literature DB >> 2551374

Characterization of multiple forms of the Ah receptor: comparison of species and tissues.

E C Henry1, G Rucci, T A Gasiewicz.   

Abstract

Biochemical and toxic responses to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) appear to be mediated via the Ah receptor, a gene-regulatory protein that, like steroid hormone receptors, undergoes a ligand-dependent acquisition of affinity for nuclei and DNA. Since responses to TCDD are highly species- and tissue-specific, we compared DNA-binding properties of Ah receptor from several tissues of rat, C57BL/6 mouse, hamster, and guinea pig, using DNA-Sepharose chromatography. Hepatic cytosol from all species contained TCDD.receptor complexes that eluted at approximately 0.15 (peak 1) and approximately 0.33 M NaCl (peak 2). The relative proportions of these forms as well as of TCDD-receptor that did not bind to DNA (i.e., was present in flowthrough fractions) varied among species. In each case, the yield of the higher affinity form (peak 2) increased with time or temperature of incubation. Cytosol from lung, thymus, kidney, and testis contained the same two forms; peak 2 was the major DNA-binding form only in thymus. In KCl extracts of hepatic nuclei from animals treated with [3H]TCDD, only the higher affinity form (peak 2) was found. Peak 1 isolated from cytosol by DNA-Sepharose and incubated with hepatic cytosol from D2 mouse (which contains no detectable receptor) transformed into peak 2, suggesting that these two forms are different conformations of the same protein. Sucrose density gradient and gel filtration analyses of peaks 1 and 2 isolated from DNA-Sepharose indicated that (i) the untransformed form (peak 1) was smaller than the unoccupied and the transformed forms, (ii) 0.4 M KCl in the density gradients had little effect on these isolated forms, and (iii) nuclear receptor sedimented like peak 2. On the basis of these results, we hypothesize that the Ah receptor exists in several forms: When occupied, it has no affinity for DNA. Ligand binding initially yields a smaller form with low DNA affinity (i.e., peak 1), as well as, in some cases, a form with no DNA affinity (flowthrough fractions); further incubation in the presence of cytosolic factor(s) induces a change conferring higher DNA affinity and faster sedimentation (i.e., peak 2). The latter form is likely the transcriptionally active form in vivo. Species and tissue differences in this scheme are quantitative rather than qualitative.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2551374     DOI: 10.1021/bi00441a041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  15 in total

Review 1.  The Ah receptor and the mechanism of dioxin toxicity.

Authors:  J P Landers; N J Bunce
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 3.857

2.  Ah Receptor Pathway Intricacies; Signaling Through Diverse Protein Partners and DNA-Motifs.

Authors:  D P Jackson; A D Joshi; C J Elferink
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.524

3.  Nucleoside triphosphates promote the transformation of Ah receptor to its DNA-binding form.

Authors:  A J Cary; J J Dougherty
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1991-03-01       Impact factor: 3.857

4.  Molecular determinants of species-specific agonist and antagonist activity of a substituted flavone towards the aryl hydrocarbon receptor.

Authors:  E C Henry; T A Gasiewicz
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 4.013

5.  Down regulation of CYP 1A1 by glucocorticoids in trout hepatocytes in vitro.

Authors:  A K Dasmahapatra; P C Lee
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.416

6.  Transformation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor to a DNA-binding form is accompanied by release of the 90 kDa heat-shock protein and increased affinity for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.

Authors:  E C Henry; T A Gasiewicz
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1993-08-15       Impact factor: 3.857

7.  Ribonuclease inhibits Ah receptor transformation in vitro.

Authors:  E C Henry; K A Hayden; P A Bauman; T A Gasiewicz
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1991-11-01       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 8.  The aryl hydrocarbon receptor complex and the control of gene expression.

Authors:  Timothy V Beischlag; J Luis Morales; Brett D Hollingshead; Gary H Perdew
Journal:  Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.807

Review 9.  NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase1 (DT-diaphorase) expression in normal and tumor tissues.

Authors:  M Belinsky; A K Jaiswal
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 9.264

10.  Mechanism of action of a repressor of dioxin-dependent induction of Cyp1a1 gene transcription.

Authors:  A J Watson; K I Weir-Brown; R M Bannister; F F Chu; S Reisz-Porszasz; Y Fujii-Kuriyama; K Sogawa; O Hankinson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.