| Literature DB >> 25512839 |
Cid André Fidelis de Paula Gomes1, Yasmin El Hage2, Ana Paula Amaral3, Fabiano Politti2, Daniela Aparecida Biasotto-Gonzalez2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Temporomandibular disorder (TDM) is the most common source of orofacial pain of a non-dental origin. Sleep bruxism is characterized by clenching and/or grinding the teeth during sleep and is involved in the perpetuation of TMD. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of massage therapy, conventional occlusal splint therapy and silicone occlusal splint therapy on electromyographic activity in the masseter and anterior temporal muscles and the intensity of signs and symptoms in individuals with severe TMD and sleep bruxism.Entities:
Keywords: Massage therapy; Occlusal splint; Physical therapy modalities; Temporomandibular joint disorders
Year: 2014 PMID: 25512839 PMCID: PMC4266206 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-014-0043-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chiropr Man Therap ISSN: 2045-709X
Figure 1Median (25% and 75% quartile) of median frequency (Hz) in right and left anterior temporal and masseter muscles during maximum voluntary clenching in each group (non-significant differences, > 0.05; Kruskal-Wallis test).
Pre-treatment and post-treatment MDF in right temporal (RT), right masseter (RM), left temporal (LT) and left masseter (LM) during maximum voluntary clenching in different groups (Wilcoxon signed rank test)
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| 181.9 [136.2-201.4] | 188.7 [169.9-213.6] | 189,5 [140.9-203.1] | 159.7 [157.7-173.6] |
|
| 173.1 [133.3-189.5] | 195.8 [182.9-210.1] | 198.0 [138.4-206.1] | 168.7 [156.5-180.2] | |
|
| 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.44 | |
|
|
| 170.9 [150.9-185.5] | 151.6 [116.9-168,9] | 142.8 [116.8-182.1] | 156.5 [130.6-177.5] |
|
| 155.3 [113.3-187.3] | 160.4 [135.7-183,8] | 149.2 [120.4-177.2] | 148.7 [121.3-167.5] | |
|
| 0.22 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.91 | |
|
|
| 178.7 [152.3-188.2] | 194.8 [158.9-206.8] | 176.1 [143.6-193.8] | 156.7 [122.1-188.2] |
|
| 168.7 [147.2-199.7] | 193.4 [158.4-206.3] | 183.4 [136.4-196.9] | 170.4 [145.5-208.7] | |
|
| 0.82 | 0.91 | 0.36 | 0.60 | |
|
|
| 157.5 [140,6-169.4] | 145.8 [120.8-169.4] | 142.1 [118.2-171.6] | 135.0 [117.4-158.0] |
|
| 142.3 [123.5-170.4] | 154.3 [122.3-179.7] | 152.6 [124.3-157.5] | 143.8 [90.09-155.8] | |
|
| 0.60 | 0.67 | 0.82 | 0.15 |
MG: massage therapy group; COSG: conventional occlusal splint group; MCOSG: massage therapy + conventional occlusal splint group; SOSG: silicone occlusal splint group.
Mean e standard deviation and the results of interactions between groups (ANOVA) pre e post treatment relative intensity according to Fonseca Patient History Index
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| MG | 67±12,5 | 50,33 ±10,76a | Treatment (Pré x Post) | 32,41 | <0,0001 |
| COSG | 52 ±15,44 | 44 ±13,78a | Groups (MG x COSG x MCOSG x SOSG) | 8,88 | <0,0001 |
| MCOSG | 54,33±21,03 | 29,33±10,83a,b | |||
| SOSG | 56±16,16 | 59,33±13,21 | |||
aSignificant difference between pre e post treatment (ANOVA, Bonferroni corrections).
bSignificant difference between groups MCOSG > MG, COSG, SOSG (Test post hoc de Tukey).