Literature DB >> 25512199

The associations between objective numeracy and colorectal cancer screening knowledge, attitudes and defensive processing in a deprived community sample.

Samuel G Smith1, Lindsay C Kobayashi2, Michael S Wolf3, Rosalind Raine2, Jane Wardle2, Christian von Wagner2.   

Abstract

We examined associations between numeracy and sociocognitive factors associated with colorectal cancer screening uptake (n = 964). Nearly half (45.7%) of the respondents incorrectly answered a numeracy question (low numeracy). Low numeracy respondents were less knowledgeable about colorectal cancer (p < .001), less positive towards screening (emotional, p < .001 and practical, p = .001) and less likely to intend to participate in screening (p = .001). They also reported greater defensive processing of cancer information (p = .001). Sociocognitive factors fully mediated the relationship between numeracy and screening intention. Addressing numeracy issues may reduce inequalities in CRC screening participation, but communication strategies could be limited by the tendency process cancer information defensively.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attitudes; colorectal cancer; health communication; health literacy; numeracy; screening

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25512199     DOI: 10.1177/1359105314560919

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Psychol        ISSN: 1359-1053


  10 in total

1.  The Influence of Health Numeracy and Health Warning Label Type on Smoking Myths and Quit-Related Reactions.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Klein; Amanda J Quisenberry; Abigail B Shoben; Dan Romer; Ellen Peters
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  A Cardiovascular Health Intervention for Spanish Speakers: The Health Literacy and ESL Curriculum.

Authors:  Francisco Soto Mas; Cheryl L Schmitt; Holly E Jacobson; Orrin B Myers
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2018-08

3.  Health Literacy and Health-Related Quality of Life Among a Population-Based Sample of Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Julie L Halverson; Ana P Martinez-Donate; Mari Palta; Ticiana Leal; Sam Lubner; Matthew C Walsh; Jeanne Schaaf Strickland; Paul D Smith; Amy Trentham-Dietz
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2015-07-10

4.  How Are Information Seeking, Scanning, and Processing Related to Beliefs About the Roles of Genetics and Behavior in Cancer Causation?

Authors:  Erika A Waters; Courtney Wheeler; Jada G Hamilton
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2016-09-23

5.  Evaluating the impact of a community-based cancer awareness roadshow on awareness, attitudes and behaviors.

Authors:  Samuel G Smith; Kirstie Osborne; Sophie Tring; Helen George; Emily Power
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  A lack of information engagement among colorectal cancer screening non-attenders: cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Lindsay C Kobayashi; Jo Waller; Christian von Wagner; Jane Wardle
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Cancer Fatalism, Literacy, and Cancer Information Seeking in the American Public.

Authors:  Lindsay C Kobayashi; Samuel G Smith
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2015-09-16

8.  Inequalities in cancer screening participation: examining differences in perceived benefits and barriers.

Authors:  S G Smith; L M McGregor; R Raine; J Wardle; C von Wagner; K A Robb
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  Predictors of Undergoing Colonoscopy, Does Time Horizon Matter?

Authors:  Agnieszka Olchowska-Kotala; Beata Bajcar
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2020-04

10.  How Do Women Interpret the NHS Information Leaflet about Cervical Cancer Screening?

Authors:  Yasmina Okan; Dafina Petrova; Samuel G Smith; Vedran Lesic; Wändi Bruine de Bruin
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 2.583

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.