Sara S McMillan1, Fiona Kelly2,3, Adem Sav2,4, Elizabeth Kendall2, Michelle A King5, Jennifer A Whitty2,6, Amanda J Wheeler2,3. 1. Population and Social Health Research Program, Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, University drive, Meadowbrook, QLD, 4131, Australia. s.mcmillan@griffith.edu.au. 2. Population and Social Health Research Program, Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, University drive, Meadowbrook, QLD, 4131, Australia. 3. School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. 4. School of Allied Health, Australian Catholic University, Banyo, QLD, Australia. 5. School of Pharmacy, Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Parklands Drive, Southport, QLD, 4215, Australia. 6. School of Pharmacy, University of Queensland, Cornwall Street, Wooloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Health professionals, including pharmacists, are encouraged to meet the needs of their consumers in an efficient and patient-centred manner. Yet, there is limited information as to what consumers with chronic conditions need from pharmacy as a healthcare destination or how well pharmacy staff understand these needs. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify service user priorities for ideal community pharmacy services for consumers with chronic conditions and their carers, and compare these priorities with what pharmacy staff think these groups want. METHODS: The nominal group technique was undertaken with pharmacist, pharmacy support staff, consumer and carer groups in four Australian regions between December 2012 and April 2013. Participant ideas and priorities for ideal services or care were identified, and contextual insight was obtained by thematic analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-one nominal group sessions are accepted, including 15 consumer and carer, four pharmacist and two pharmacy support staff groups. Pharmacy staff views generally aligned with consumer priorities, such as access, affordability, patient-centred care and continuity and coordinated care, yet diverged with respect to consumer information or education on medication and services. Fundamentally, consumers and carers sought streamlined access to information and medication, in a coordinated, patient-centred approach. Alleviating financial burden was a key consumer priority, with a call for the continuation and extension of medication subsidies. CONCLUSION: Overall, pharmacy staff had a reasonable understanding of what consumers would prioritise, but further emphasis on the importance, delivery, or both, of consumer information is needed. Greater consideration is needed from policy makers regarding the financial barriers to accessing medication for consumers with chronic conditions.
BACKGROUND: Health professionals, including pharmacists, are encouraged to meet the needs of their consumers in an efficient and patient-centred manner. Yet, there is limited information as to what consumers with chronic conditions need from pharmacy as a healthcare destination or how well pharmacy staff understand these needs. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify service user priorities for ideal community pharmacy services for consumers with chronic conditions and their carers, and compare these priorities with what pharmacy staff think these groups want. METHODS: The nominal group technique was undertaken with pharmacist, pharmacy support staff, consumer and carer groups in four Australian regions between December 2012 and April 2013. Participant ideas and priorities for ideal services or care were identified, and contextual insight was obtained by thematic analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-one nominal group sessions are accepted, including 15 consumer and carer, four pharmacist and two pharmacy support staff groups. Pharmacy staff views generally aligned with consumer priorities, such as access, affordability, patient-centred care and continuity and coordinated care, yet diverged with respect to consumer information or education on medication and services. Fundamentally, consumers and carers sought streamlined access to information and medication, in a coordinated, patient-centred approach. Alleviating financial burden was a key consumer priority, with a call for the continuation and extension of medication subsidies. CONCLUSION: Overall, pharmacy staff had a reasonable understanding of what consumers would prioritise, but further emphasis on the importance, delivery, or both, of consumer information is needed. Greater consideration is needed from policy makers regarding the financial barriers to accessing medication for consumers with chronic conditions.
Authors: Sara S McMillan; Amanda J Wheeler; Adem Sav; Michelle A King; Jennifer A Whitty; Elizabeth Kendall; Fiona Kelly Journal: Res Social Adm Pharm Date: 2012-12-05
Authors: Laurann Yen; James Gillespie; Yun-Hee Jeon; Marjan Kljakovic; Jo Anne Brien; Stephen Jan; Elin Lehnbom; Carmen Pearce-Brown; Tim Usherwood Journal: Health Expect Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Jennifer A Whitty; Adem Sav; Fiona Kelly; Michelle A King; Sara S McMillan; Elizabeth Kendall; Amanda J Wheeler Journal: Aust Health Rev Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 1.990
Authors: Anna Hynd; Elizabeth E Roughead; David B Preen; John Glover; Max Bulsara; James Semmens Journal: Aust N Z J Public Health Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 2.939
Authors: Paul E Ronksley; Claudia Sanmartin; Hude Quan; Pietro Ravani; Marcello Tonelli; Braden Manns; Brenda R Hemmelgarn Journal: Open Med Date: 2012-04-24
Authors: Ilaria Durosini; Rosanne Janssens; Reinhard Arnou; Jorien Veldwijk; Meredith Y Smith; Dario Monzani; Ian Smith; Giulia Galli; Marina Garassino; Eva G Katz; Luca Bailo; Evelyne Louis; Marie Vandevelde; Kristiaan Nackaerts; G Ardine de Wit; Gabriella Pravettoni; Isabelle Huys Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2021-02-05