BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study investigates health professionals' reactions to patients' perceptions of health issues - a little-researched topic vital to the reform of the care of chronic illness. METHODS: Focus groups were undertaken with doctors, nurses, allied health staff and pharmacists (n = 88) in two Australian urban regions. The focus groups explored responses to patient experiences of chronic illness (COPD, Diabetes, CHF) obtained in an earlier qualitative study. Content analysis was undertaken of the transcripts assisted by NVivo7 software. RESULTS: Health professionals and patients agreed on general themes: that competing demands in self-management, financial pressure and co-morbidity were problems for people with chronic illness. However where patients and carers focused on their personal challenges, health professionals often saw the patient experience as a series of failures relating to compliance or service fragmentation. Some saw this as a result of individual shortcomings. Most identified structural and attitudinal issues. All saw the prime solution as additional resources for their own activities. Fee for service providers (mainly doctors) sought increased remuneration; salaried professionals (mainly nurses and allied health professionals) sought to increase capacity within their professional group. CONCLUSIONS: Professionals focus on their own resources and the behaviour of other professionals to improve management of chronic illness. They did not factor information from patient experience into their views about systems improvement. This inability to identify solutions beyond their professional sphere highlights the limitations of an over-reliance on the perspectives of health professionals. The views of patients and carers must find a stronger voice in health policy.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study investigates health professionals' reactions to patients' perceptions of health issues - a little-researched topic vital to the reform of the care of chronic illness. METHODS: Focus groups were undertaken with doctors, nurses, allied health staff and pharmacists (n = 88) in two Australian urban regions. The focus groups explored responses to patient experiences of chronic illness (COPD, Diabetes, CHF) obtained in an earlier qualitative study. Content analysis was undertaken of the transcripts assisted by NVivo7 software. RESULTS: Health professionals and patients agreed on general themes: that competing demands in self-management, financial pressure and co-morbidity were problems for people with chronic illness. However where patients and carers focused on their personal challenges, health professionals often saw the patient experience as a series of failures relating to compliance or service fragmentation. Some saw this as a result of individual shortcomings. Most identified structural and attitudinal issues. All saw the prime solution as additional resources for their own activities. Fee for service providers (mainly doctors) sought increased remuneration; salaried professionals (mainly nurses and allied health professionals) sought to increase capacity within their professional group. CONCLUSIONS: Professionals focus on their own resources and the behaviour of other professionals to improve management of chronic illness. They did not factor information from patient experience into their views about systems improvement. This inability to identify solutions beyond their professional sphere highlights the limitations of an over-reliance on the perspectives of health professionals. The views of patients and carers must find a stronger voice in health policy.
Authors: Yun-Hee Jeon; Tanisha Jowsey; Laurann Yen; Nicholas J Glasgow; Beverley Essue; Marjan Kljakovic; Carmen Pearce-Brown; Masoud Mirzaei; Tim Usherwood; Stephen Jan; Stefan G Kraus; Clive Aspin Journal: Aust J Prim Health Date: 2010 Impact factor: 1.307
Authors: Grant M Russell; Simone Dahrouge; William Hogg; Robert Geneau; Laura Muldoon; Meltem Tuna Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2009 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: John Oldroyd; Judith Proudfoot; Fernando A Infante; Gawaine Powell Davies; Tanya Bubner; Chris Holton; Justin J Beilby; Mark F Harris Journal: Med J Aust Date: 2003-07-07 Impact factor: 7.738
Authors: D Somme; H Trouvé; Y Couturier; S Carrier; D Gagnon; B Lavallart; R Hébert; C Cretin; O Saint-Jean Journal: Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique Date: 2008-02-21 Impact factor: 1.019
Authors: Yun-Hee Jeon; Beverley Essue; Stephen Jan; Robert Wells; Judith A Whitworth Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2009-10-09 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Tanisha Jowsey; Yun-Hee Jeon; Paul Dugdale; Nicholas J Glasgow; Marjan Kljakovic; Tim Usherwood Journal: Aust New Zealand Health Policy Date: 2009-09-08
Authors: Simone A van Dulmen; Sue Lukersmith; Josephine Muxlow; Elaine Santa Mina; Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden; Philip J van der Wees Journal: Health Expect Date: 2013-10-14 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Lisa C Bratzke; Rebecca J Muehrer; Karen A Kehl; Kyoung Suk Lee; Earlise C Ward; Kristine L Kwekkeboom Journal: Int J Nurs Stud Date: 2014-10-28 Impact factor: 5.837
Authors: Sara S McMillan; Fiona Kelly; Adem Sav; Elizabeth Kendall; Michelle A King; Jennifer A Whitty; Amanda J Wheeler Journal: Patient Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 3.883