Literature DB >> 25511162

Using an auditory sensory substitution device to augment vision: evidence from eye movements.

Thomas D Wright1, Aaron Margolis, Jamie Ward.   

Abstract

Sensory substitution devices convert information normally associated with one sense into another sense (e.g. converting vision into sound). This is often done to compensate for an impaired sense. The present research uses a multimodal approach in which both natural vision and sound-from-vision ('soundscapes') are simultaneously presented. Although there is a systematic correspondence between what is seen and what is heard, we introduce a local discrepancy between the signals (the presence of a target object that is heard but not seen) that the participant is required to locate. In addition to behavioural responses, the participants' gaze is monitored with eye-tracking. Although the target object is only presented in the auditory channel, behavioural performance is enhanced when visual information relating to the non-target background is presented. In this instance, vision may be used to generate predictions about the soundscape that enhances the ability to detect the hidden auditory object. The eye-tracking data reveal that participants look for longer in the quadrant containing the auditory target even when they subsequently judge it to be located elsewhere. As such, eye movements generated by soundscapes reveal the knowledge of the target location that does not necessarily correspond to the actual judgment made. The results provide a proof of principle that multimodal sensory substitution may be of benefit to visually impaired people with some residual vision and, in normally sighted participants, for guiding search within complex scenes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25511162     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-4160-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  32 in total

Review 1.  Bayesian multisensory integration and cross-modal spatial links.

Authors:  Sophie Deneve; Alexandre Pouget
Journal:  J Physiol Paris       Date:  2004 Jan-Jun

2.  Seeing with sound? exploring different characteristics of a visual-to-auditory sensory substitution device.

Authors:  David Brown; Tom Macpherson; Jamie Ward
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 3.  Mechanisms of sound localization in mammals.

Authors:  Benedikt Grothe; Michael Pecka; David McAlpine
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 37.312

4.  Cross-modal activation of visual cortex during depth perception using auditory substitution of vision.

Authors:  Laurent Renier; Olivier Collignon; Colline Poirier; Dai Tranduy; Annick Vanlierde; Anne Bol; Claude Veraart; Anne G De Volder
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  An experimental system for auditory image representations.

Authors:  P B Meijer
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 6.  The auditory dorsal pathway: orienting vision.

Authors:  Stephen R Arnott; Claude Alain
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Saccadic responses evoked by presentation of visual and auditory targets.

Authors:  D Zambarbieri; R Schmid; G Magenes; C Prablanc
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The evolution of a visual-to-auditory sensory substitution device using interactive genetic algorithms.

Authors:  Thomas Wright; Jamie Ward
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  Compensatory strategies following visual search training in patients with homonymous hemianopia: an eye movement study.

Authors:  Sabira K Mannan; Alidz L M Pambakian; Christopher Kennard
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Auditory and multisensory aspects of visuospatial neglect.

Authors:  Francesco Pavani; Elisabetta Ládavas; Jon Driver
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  2 in total

1.  Perception of Graphical Virtual Environments by Blind Users via Sensory Substitution.

Authors:  Shachar Maidenbaum; Galit Buchs; Sami Abboud; Ori Lavi-Rotbain; Amir Amedi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Designing sensory-substitution devices: Principles, pitfalls and potential1.

Authors:  Árni Kristjánsson; Alin Moldoveanu; Ómar I Jóhannesson; Oana Balan; Simone Spagnol; Vigdís Vala Valgeirsdóttir; Rúnar Unnthorsson
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.406

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.