Literature DB >> 15477036

Bayesian multisensory integration and cross-modal spatial links.

Sophie Deneve1, Alexandre Pouget.   

Abstract

Our perception of the word is the result of combining information between several senses, such as vision, audition and proprioception. These sensory modalities use widely different frames of reference to represent the properties and locations of object. Moreover, multisensory cues come with different degrees of reliability, and the reliability of a given cue can change in different contexts. The Bayesian framework--which we describe in this review--provides an optimal solution to deal with this issue of combining cues that are not equally reliable. However, this approach does not address the issue of frames of references. We show that this problem can be solved by creating cross-modal spatial links in basis function networks. Finally, we show how the basis function approach can be combined with the Bayesian framework to yield networks that can perform optimal multisensory combination. On the basis of this theory, we argue that multisensory integration is a dialogue between sensory modalities rather that the convergence of all sensory information onto a supra-modal area.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15477036     DOI: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2004.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol Paris        ISSN: 0928-4257


  73 in total

1.  Encoding of variability of landmark-based spatial information.

Authors:  Bradley R Sturz; Kent D Bodily
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-02-24

2.  Navigation in space--the role of the macaque ventral intraparietal area.

Authors:  Frank Bremmer
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Perception of angular displacement without landmarks: evidence for Bayesian fusion of vestibular, optokinetic, podokinesthetic, and cognitive information.

Authors:  Reinhart Jürgens; Wolfgang Becker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-07-11       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Sensory integration does not lead to sensory calibration.

Authors:  Jeroen B J Smeets; John J van den Dobbelsteen; Denise D J de Grave; Robert J van Beers; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Spatial reference frames of visual, vestibular, and multimodal heading signals in the dorsal subdivision of the medial superior temporal area.

Authors:  Christopher R Fetsch; Sentao Wang; Yong Gu; Gregory C Deangelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Which portion of the natural panorama is used for view-based navigation in the Australian desert ant?

Authors:  Paul Graham; Ken Cheng
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Eye-centered representation of optic flow tuning in the ventral intraparietal area.

Authors:  Xiaodong Chen; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Sex differences in the weighting of metric and categorical information in spatial location memory.

Authors:  Mark P Holden; Sarah J Duff-Canning; Elizabeth Hampson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-01-17

9.  Dynamic reweighting of visual and vestibular cues during self-motion perception.

Authors:  Christopher R Fetsch; Amanda H Turner; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The weight of representing the body: addressing the potentially indefinite number of body representations in healthy individuals.

Authors:  Marjolein P M Kammers; Joris Mulder; Frédérique de Vignemont; H Chris Dijkerman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.