Literature DB >> 25510979

Criteria for the Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc. (RIFM) safety evaluation process for fragrance ingredients.

A M Api1, D Belsito2, M Bruze3, P Cadby4, P Calow5, M L Dagli6, W Dekant7, G Ellis8, A D Fryer9, M Fukayama10, P Griem11, C Hickey12, L Kromidas12, J F Lalko12, D C Liebler13, Y Miyachi14, V T Politano12, K Renskers15, G Ritacco12, D Salvito12, T W Schultz16, I G Sipes17, B Smith4, D Vitale12, D K Wilcox12.   

Abstract

The Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc. (RIFM) has been engaged in the generation and evaluation of safety data for fragrance materials since its inception over 45 years ago. Over time, RIFM's approach to gathering data, estimating exposure and assessing safety has evolved as the tools for risk assessment evolved. This publication is designed to update the RIFM safety assessment process, which follows a series of decision trees, reflecting advances in approaches in risk assessment and new and classical toxicological methodologies employed by RIFM over the past ten years. These changes include incorporating 1) new scientific information including a framework for choosing structural analogs, 2) consideration of the Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC), 3) the Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) for dermal sensitization, 4) the respiratory route of exposure, 5) aggregate exposure assessment methodology, 6) the latest methodology and approaches to risk assessments, 7) the latest alternatives to animal testing methodology and 8) environmental risk assessment. The assessment begins with a thorough analysis of existing data followed by in silico analysis, identification of 'read across' analogs, generation of additional data through in vitro testing as well as consideration of the TTC approach. If necessary, risk management may be considered.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Environmental toxicology; Fragrance material; Human health toxicology; Safety assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25510979     DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2014.11.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol        ISSN: 0278-6915            Impact factor:   6.023


  8 in total

1.  Estimating infants' and toddlers' inhalation exposure to fragrance ingredients in baby personal care products.

Authors:  Jiaqi Zhou; Neena K Tierney; Timothy J McCarthy; Kathleen G Black; Marta Hernandez; Clifford P Weisel
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2018-06-07

2.  Internationalization of read-across as a validated new approach method (NAM) for regulatory toxicology.

Authors:  Costanza Rovida; Tara Barton-Maclaren; Emilio Benfenati; Francesca Caloni; P. Charukeshi Chandrasekera; Christophe Chesné; Mark T D Cronin; Joop De Knecht; Daniel R Dietrich; Sylvia E Escher; Suzanne Fitzpatrick; Brenna Flannery; Matthias Herzler; Susanne Hougaard Bennekou; Bruno Hubesch; Hennicke Kamp; Jaffar Kisitu; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Simona Kovarich; Marcel Leist; Alexandra Maertens; Kerry Nugent; Giorgia Pallocca; Manuel Pastor; Grace Patlewicz; Manuela Pavan; Octavio Presgrave; Lena Smirnova; Michael Schwarz; Takashi Yamada; Thomas Hartung
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 6.250

3.  Toward Good Read-Across Practice (GRAP) guidance.

Authors:  Nicholas Ball; Mark T D Cronin; Jie Shen; Karen Blackburn; Ewan D Booth; Mounir Bouhifd; Elizabeth Donley; Laura Egnash; Charles Hastings; Daland R Juberg; Andre Kleensang; Nicole Kleinstreuer; E Dinant Kroese; Adam C Lee; Thomas Luechtefeld; Alexandra Maertens; Sue Marty; Jorge M Naciff; Jessica Palmer; David Pamies; Mike Penman; Andrea-Nicole Richarz; Daniel P Russo; Sharon B Stuard; Grace Patlewicz; Bennard van Ravenzwaay; Shengde Wu; Hao Zhu; Thomas Hartung
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 6.043

4.  Fragrance Skin Sensitization Evaluation and Human Testing: 30-Year Experience.

Authors:  Mihwa Na; Gretchen Ritacco; Devin O'Brien; Maura Lavelle; Anne Marie Api; David Basketter
Journal:  Dermatitis       Date:  2021 Sep-Oct 01       Impact factor: 4.845

5.  The BlueScreen HC assay to predict the genotoxic potential of fragrance materials.

Authors:  Yax Thakkar; Kaushal Joshi; Christina Hickey; Joseph Wahler; Brian Wall; Sylvain Etter; Benjamin Smith; Peter Griem; Matthew Tate; Frank Jones; Gladys Oudraogo; Stefan Pfuhler; Christopher Choi; Gary Williams; Helmut Greim; Gerhard Eisenbrand; Wolfgang Dekant; Anne Marie Api
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 3.000

6.  Weight of Evidence Approach for Skin Sensitization Potency Categorization of Fragrance Ingredients.

Authors:  Mihwa Na; Devin O'Brien; Maura Lavelle; Isabelle Lee; G Frank Gerberick; Anne Marie Api
Journal:  Dermatitis       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr 01       Impact factor: 4.867

7.  Clustering a Chemical Inventory for Safety Assessment of Fragrance Ingredients: Identifying Read-Across Analogs to Address Data Gaps.

Authors:  Mihir S Date; Devin O'Brien; Danielle J Botelho; Terry W Schultz; Daniel C Liebler; Trevor M Penning; Daniel T Salvito
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 3.739

8.  Examination of VOC Concentration of Aroma Essential Oils and Their Major VOCs Diffused in Room Air.

Authors:  Toshio Itoh; Yoshitake Masuda; Ichiro Matsubara; Junichirou Arai; Woosuck Shin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.