| Literature DB >> 25506607 |
Juliana Silva de Lima1, Roberta Cruz1, Julyanna Cordoville Fonseca1, Erika Valente de Medeiros2, Marília de Holanda Cavalcanti Maciel1, Keila Aparecida Moreira2, Cristina Maria de Souza Motta1.
Abstract
Tannase is an enzyme that hydrolyzes esters and lateral bonds of tannins, such as tannic acid, releasing glucose and gallic acid and stands out in the clarification of wines and juices. Fungi of the genera Aspergillus and Penicillium are excellent producers of this enzyme. The search for fungi that produce high levels of tannase as well as new substrates for the enzyme production by the SSF is required. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the production of tannase by Aspergillus and Penicillium species through SSF using leaves and agroindustrial waste barbados cherry and mangaba fruit as substrate, select the best producer, optimize production, characterize the crude enzyme extract, and apply it the clarification of grape juice. Selecting the best producer was performed by planning Placket-Burman and RSM. P. montanense showed highest activity with 41.64 U/mL after 72 h of fermentation residue using barbados cherry, with 3.5% tannic acid and 70% moisture. The enzyme showed the highest activity at pH 9.0 and 50°C. The tannase of P. montanense was stable over a wide pH range and temperature and, when applied to grape juice, showed higher efficiency by reducing 46% of the tannin content after incubation 120 m.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25506607 PMCID: PMC4259084 DOI: 10.1155/2014/182025
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Tannase activity (U/mL) strains of Aspergillus and Penicillium produced under solid state fermentation (SSF) using agroindustrial waste and leaves of barbardos cherry (Malpighia emarginata) and residue and leaves of mangaba fruit (Hancornia speciosa Gomez) as substrates after 96 hours of fermentation.
| Lineage | No. URM | Mangaba leaf | Acerola leaf | Residue mangaba | Residue acerola |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 4953 | 8.14 | 4.14 | 10.21 | 4.71 |
|
| 5051 | 18.57 | 5.21 | 14.35 | 7.42 |
|
| 5012 | 9.35 | 4.35 | 10.07 | 4.35 |
|
| 5076 | 20.14 | 4.57 | 12.28 | 6.00 |
|
| 6151 | 9.57 | 4.92 | 9.57 | 4.78 |
|
| 4641 | 15.35 | 2.92 | 8.92 | 5.28 |
|
| 5751 | 5.00 | 3.78 | 22.85 | 6.28 |
|
| 5996 | 6.50 | 4.14 | 12.78 | 4.35 |
|
| 5836 | 12.21 | 4.21 | 9.00 | 10.21 |
|
| 5963 | 13.85 | 4.00 | 13.35 | 7.92 |
|
| 4634 | 13.64 | 5.00 | 12.00 | 4.85 |
|
| 6089 | 9.28 | 5.32 | 9.71 | 27.64 |
|
| 3842 | 8.42 | 5.32 | 9.35 | 6.42 |
|
| 6160 | 9.71 | 4.14 | 7.85 | 27.00 |
|
| 5000 | 11.78 | 4.42 | 11.28 | 18.00 |
|
| 6026 | 4.85 | 5.07 | 11.85 | 4.42 |
|
| 6286 | 4.92 | 3.64 | 10.92 | 6.64 |
|
| 6147 | 5.42 | 4.92 | 12.00 | 7.21 |
|
| 5967 | 8.64 | 4.50 | 11.35 | 5.35 |
|
| 6216 | 27.92 | 4.00 | 11.21 | 5.35 |
|
| 6137 | 8.00 | 3.71 | 11.28 | 7.85 |
|
| 6092 | 7.50 | 5.78 | 10.78 | 7.35 |
|
| 6288 | 4.50 | 4.35 | 9.78 | 3.57 |
|
| 6042 | 9.14 | 5.00 | 11.64 | 17.50 |
|
| 6090 | 4.85 | 3.35 | 10.07 | 4.42 |
|
| 6286 | 4.78 | 5.42 | 10.14 | 31.88 |
|
| 6277 | 5.92 | 5.92 | 11.71 | 14.28 |
|
| 6138 | 5.71 | 4.28 | 12.57 | 9.78 |
|
| 6222 | 9.50 | 5.21 | 10.42 | 8.07 |
Species of Aspergillus and Penicillium reported as producing tannase between the years 1968 and 2014.
| Species | References |
|---|---|
|
| [ |
|
| [ |
|
| [ |
|
| [ |
|
| [ |
|
| [ |
|
| [ |
|
| [ |
|
| [ |
|
| [ |
|
| [ |
|
| [ |
|
| [ |
|
| [ |
|
| [ |
|
| [ |
|
| [ |
|
| [ |
|
| [ |
|
| [ |
Experimental matrix Plackett-Burman planning (PB) for the production of tannase from Penicillium montanense URM 6286 under FES using agroindustrial wastes.
| Trials | Time | Temperature | Moisture | pH | Tannic acid | Yeast extract | Urea | Glucose | Starch | Manganese sulfate | Monobasic potassium phosphate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 120 (+) | 36 (+) | 35 (−) | 8 (+) | 0.5 (−) | 0.25 (−) | 0.25 (−) | 0.5 (+) | 0.5 (+) | 0.1 (+) | 0.1 (−) |
| 2 | 120 (+) | 36 (+) | 35 (−) | 8 (+) | 2 (+) | 0.25 (−) | 0.5 (+) | 0.1 (−) | 0.1 (−) | 0.05 (−) | 0.5 (+) |
| 3 | 72 (−) | 36 (+) | 65 (+) | 5 (−) | 2 (+) | 0.25 (−) | 0.25 (−) | 0.1 (−) | 0.5 (+) | 0.1 (+) | 0.5 (+) |
| 4 | 72 (−) | 28 (−) | 65 (+) | 8 (+) | 2 (+) | 0.25 (−) | 0.5 (+) | 0.5 (+) | 0.1 (−) | 0.1 (+) | 0.1 (−) |
| 5 | 120 (+) | 36 (+) | 65 (+) | 5 (−) | 2 (+) | 0.5 (+) | 0.25 (−) | 0.5 (+) | 0.1 (−) | 0.05 (−) | 0.1 (−) |
| 6 | 72 (−) | 28 (−) | 35 (−) | 5 (−) | 0.5 (−) | 0.25 (−) | 0.25 (−) | 0.1 (−) | 0.1 (−) | 0.05 (−) | 0.1 (−) |
| 7 | 120 (+) | 28 (−) | 65 (+) | 5 (−) | 0.5 (−) | 0.25 (−) | 0.5 (+) | 0.5 (+) | 0.5 (+) | 0.05 (−) | 0.5 (+) |
| 8 | 72 (−) | 28 (−) | 35 (−) | 8 (+) | 2 (+) | 0.5 (+) | 0.25 (−) | 0.5 (+) | 0.5 (+) | 0.05 (−) | 0.5 (+) |
| 9 | 120 (+) | 28 (−) | 65 (+) | 8 (+) | 0.5 (−) | 0.5 (+) | 0.25 (−) | 0.1 (−) | 0.1 (−) | 0.1 (+) | 0.5 (+) |
| 10 | 72 (−) | 36 (+) | 65 (+) | 8 (+) | 0.5 (−) | 0.5 (+) | 0.5 (+) | 0.1 (−) | 0.5 (+) | 0.05 (−) | 0.1 (−) |
| 11 | 72 (−) | 36 (+) | 35 (−) | 5 (−) | 0.5 (−) | 0.5 (+) | 0.5 (+) | 0.5 (+) | 0.1 (−) | 0.1 (+) | 0.5 (+) |
| 12 | 120 (+) | 28 (−) | 35 (−) | 5 (−) | 2 (+) | 0.5 (+) | 0.5 (+) | 0.1 (−) | 0.5 (+) | 0.1 (+) | 0.1 (−) |
Results and coefficient effect for the production of tannase presented by the variables used in the Plackett-Burman design (PB).
| Variables | Effect | Coefficient |
|---|---|---|
| (1) Time | −0.67538 | −0.337691 |
| (2) Temperature | 3.75272* | 1.876362 |
| (3) Moisture | 1.96078* | 0.980392 |
| (4) pH | −1.90632 | −0.953159 |
| (5) Tannic acid | 3.15359* | 1.576797 |
| (6) Yeast extract | −0.49564 | −0.247821 |
| (7) Urea | −1.90632 | −0.953159 |
| (8) Glucose | −1.78105 | −0.890523 |
| (9) Starch | 0.50654 | 0.253268 |
| (10) Manganese sulfate | −0.43573 | −0.217865 |
| (11) Monobasic potassium phosphate | 0.96405 | 0.482026 |
*Significant effect.
Significant variables used in the response surface methodology (RSM).
| Independent variables | − | −1 | 0 | +1 | + |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature | 34 | 35.5 | 37 | 38.5 | 40 |
| Moisture | 65 | 67.5 | 70 | 72.5 | 75 |
| Tannic acid | 3.0 | 3.25 | 3.5 | 3.75 | 4.0 |
Figure 1Response surface graph showing the effect to tannic acid and temperature interaction on tannase activity in SSF.
Figure 2Response surface graph showing the effect of tannic acid and moisture interaction on tannase activity in SSF.
Figure 3Effect of pH and stability (2 hours incubation) on the activity of tannase from Penicillium montanense URM 6486.
Figure 4Effect of temperature and stability (2 hours incubation) on the tannase activity.
Figure 5Effect of different volumes of tannase in the degradation of tannins present in grape juice after 120 minutes of incubation. Values on Y-axis represent the amount of tannins in the juice.
Figure 6Effect of 2 mL tannase on degradation present in grape juice at different times. Values on the Y-axis represent the amount of tannins in the juice.