To investigate magnetostructural relationships in colloidal magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles (NPs) at high temperature (300-900 K), we measured the temperature dependence of magnetization (M) of oleate-capped magnetite NPs ca. 20 nm in size. Magnetometry revealed an unusual irreversible high-temperature dependence of M for these NPs, with dip and loop features observed during heating-cooling cycles. Detailed characterizations of as-synthesized and annealed Fe3O4 NPs as well as reference ligand-free Fe3O4 NPs indicate that both types of features in M(T) are related to thermal decomposition of the capping ligands. The ligand decomposition upon the initial heating induces a reduction of Fe3+ to Fe2+ and the associated dip in M, leading to more structurally and compositionally uniform magnetite NPs. Having lost the protective ligands, the NPs continually sinter during subsequent heating cycles, resulting in divergent M curves featuring loops. The increase in M with sintering proceeds not only through elimination of a magnetically dead layer on the particle surface, as a result of a decrease in specific surface area with increasing size, but also through an uncommonly invoked effect resulting from a significant change in Fe3+/Fe2+ ratio with heat treatment. The interpretation of irreversible features in M(T) indicates that reversible M(T) behavior, conversely, can be expected only for ligand-free, structurally and compositionally uniform magnetite NPs, suggesting a general applicability of high-temperature M(T) measurements as an analytical method for probing the structure and composition of magnetic nanomaterials.
To investigate magnetostructural relationships in colloidal magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles (NPs) at high temperature (300-900 K), we measured the temperature dependence of magnetization (M) of oleate-capped magnetite NPs ca. 20 nm in size. Magnetometry revealed an unusual irreversible high-temperature dependence of M for these NPs, with dip and loop features observed during heating-cooling cycles. Detailed characterizations of as-synthesized and annealed Fe3O4 NPs as well as reference ligand-free Fe3O4 NPs indicate that both types of features in M(T) are related to thermal decomposition of the capping ligands. The ligand decomposition upon the initial heating induces a reduction of Fe3+ to Fe2+ and the associated dip in M, leading to more structurally and compositionally uniform magnetite NPs. Having lost the protective ligands, the NPs continually sinter during subsequent heating cycles, resulting in divergent M curves featuring loops. The increase in M with sintering proceeds not only through elimination of a magnetically dead layer on the particle surface, as a result of a decrease in specific surface area with increasing size, but also through an uncommonly invoked effect resulting from a significant change in Fe3+/Fe2+ ratio with heat treatment. The interpretation of irreversible features in M(T) indicates that reversible M(T) behavior, conversely, can be expected only for ligand-free, structurally and compositionally uniform magnetite NPs, suggesting a general applicability of high-temperature M(T) measurements as an analytical method for probing the structure and composition of magnetic nanomaterials.
Nanoparticles
(NPs) of colloidal magnetite (Fe3O4) are a promising
material for a wide range of biomedical applications, including magnetic
resonance imaging, magnetic hyperthermia, magnetic separation/extraction,
and drug delivery.[1] For these practical
applications, Fe3O4 NPs with excellent magnetic
properties can be produced as colloidal dispersions by wet-chemistry
methods. As-synthesized NPs are typically functionalized with hydrophobic
or hydrophilic capping ligands, thereby rendering them dispersible
in organic or aqueous solvents, respectively.[2]Surfaces of NPs strongly influence their magnetic properties
(through surface/volume ratios). In particular, a reduced atomic moment
at the surfaces of NPs lowers their saturation magnetization (Ms) relative to that of the corresponding bulk
material. A reduction or even elimination of the surface disorder
can be expected when capping ligands covalently bind to the NP surface;
however, evidence for this putative surfactant effect is still a matter
of debate. Although the presence of surfactants has been shown to
enhance Ms,[3,4] several studies
have suggested that the presence of a surfactant does not cancel surface
moment reduction but rather leads to glass-like behavior of surface
spins.[5,6]Temperature-dependent measurements
of nanoparticle magnetization [M(T)] could provide insights complementary to those obtained from the
more typical measurements at or below room temperature, for example,
by probing nanoscale compositional and structural features such as
magnetic phase transitions, inhomogeneity, structural/point defects,
nonstoichiometry, and cation ordering.[7] For example, thermal treatment of ligand-capped Fe3O4 NPs can lead to chemical disproportionation of the magnetic
phase, reduction of the surface, spin disarrangement, and annihilation
of structural and point defects and can be detrimental to the chemical
order.[8−10] These compositional and structural changes will affect
the Fe–O–Fe superexchange interactions and thus be manifested
in the modification of the magnetic properties at elevated temperatures.
High-temperature magnetic measurements, therefore, can reveal useful
information even for NPs that are intended primarily for room-temperature
applications.Previously, we observed a net reduction in M after high-temperature treatment of oleate- (OL-) capped
Fe3O4 NPs, which we attributed to spin disarrangement
on the surface of the NPs resulting from thermal decomposition of
the organic shells.[11] In this work, we
found evidence of more complex mechanisms for temperature-dependent
NP magnetic properties. Specifically, in heating–cooling cycles,
our magnetite NPs exhibited irreversible M behavior
with two peculiar effects, namely, dips and loops in their M(T) curves, whose origins we investigated
using several complementary characterization techniques.
Experimental Section
Colloidal magnetite NPs were prepared
in aqueous reaction medium using a previously reported hydrothermal
method;[12] the detailed synthesis procedure
is described in the Supporting Information (SI). During synthesis, sodium oleate was used as a surfactant for the
formation of OL-capped magnetite NPs, which are colloidally stable
in organic solvents for long periods of time. To investigate their
structural evolution with thermal treatment, as-synthesized OL-capped
NPs (OL-HT) were annealed for 2 h at 650 and 900 K (OL-HT-650K and OL-HT-900K, respectively) under
a static vacuum.The NPs were characterized by magnetization
measurements (SQUID-VSM magnetometer, Quantum Design), thermogravimetric
analysis (TGA)/ differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) (TGA/DSC 1
STARe system, Mettler-Toledo), powder X-ray diffraction
(XRD) (X’Pert PRO diffractometer, PANalytical),[13] Raman scattering (alpha300 R confocal microscope,
WITec), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), high-resolution TEM
(HRTEM), high-angle annular dark-field scanning TEM (HAADF-STEM),
and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy in STEM mode (STEM-EDX) [Tecnai
G2 30 UT, Titan ChemiSTEM (FEI) and JEM-ARM200F (JEOL)
microscopes], and 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy.[14] Detailed descriptions of NP characterization
techniques are presented in the SI.
Results
We began by considering the NP magnetic behavior M(T) at elevated temperatures. We took
advantage of a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID)
magnetometer to investigate M(T)
over the range of 300–900 K for the hydrothermally synthesized
OL-capped OL-HT NPs (Figure 1). M is expressed in units of electromagnetic units per gram
of iron oxide [emu/(g of iron oxide)]; that is, the mass was corrected
for the ligand́ contribution determined by TGA. The M(T) data were repeatedly recorded under
an applied field of 10 kOe.
Figure 1
Three consecutive heating–cooling M(T) cycles measured in a 10 kOe field
for as-synthesized OL-HT magnetite NPs. TC ≈ 840 K.
Three consecutive heating–cooling M(T) cycles measured in a 10 kOe field
for as-synthesized OL-HT magnetite NPs. TC ≈ 840 K.The most distinctive phenomenon in Figure 1 is the irreversible net loss of M, which
is consistent with our previous observations.[11] Specifically, the OL-HT NPs exhibited a decrease in M when temperature was increased to the Curie temperature, TC (black line, from A to B in Figure 1); M then continuously increased
upon cooling from 900 to 300 K (black line, from B to C in Figure 1), albeit with an irreversible net loss of M (ca. 50%) relative to the initial value.Another
interesting effect clearly observed for this sample is the dip in M(T) upon the first heating (black line,
from A to B in Figure 1); the temperature corresponding
to the local minimum of the dip parameters, such as was found to be
602 K. No analogous dip features were found in the subsequent cooling
or heating curves for this sample (Figure 1), indicating that the dip was an irreversible event, unique to the
initial heating.In addition to the dip in M(T), OL-HT exhibited an irreversibility
of the subsequent cooling and heating M(T) curves, resulting in loop features. Figure 1 displays loops in M(T) measured
during three consecutive heating–cooling cycles: The temperature
at which the curves diverged, the area of the loop, and M values all underwent substantial changes during the measurements.
The area of the loop appeared to decrease with the number of cycles
with a concomitant increase in M (clearest at 300
K) toward the initial value as the number of cycles increased.We believe that the observed M(T) behavior can be attributed to nonequilibrium processes induced
by heating. To elucidate these processes, OL-HT NPs were
annealed at 650 and 900 K to produce OL-HT-650K and OL-HT-900K, respectively. We note that the 2-h annealing time
for these derivative samples was much longer than the duration of
the heating cycles in Figure 1, allowing us
to observe changes in structure and composition more clearly.Sample crystallinity was characterized by XRD (Figure 2). As-synthesized OL-HT NPs exhibited an XRD
pattern with high background and broad peaks typical for nanopowders.
In contrast, distinctly sharper diffraction peaks were observed for OL-HT-900K, indicating enhanced crystallinity and enlarged
particle size produced by annealing at 900 K. According to the phase
analysis, all three samples resembled single-phase magnetite with
cubic inverse-spinel type structure (ICDD no. 00-019-629, Fd3̅m). A lattice shift was observed
as the annealing temperature was increased to 900 K; that is, the
peaks shifted to a lower angle, reflecting a larger d spacing. The unit-cell parameter a was established
to be 8.381(1), 8.378(1), and 8.4007(4) Å for OL-HT, OL-HT-650K, and OL-HT-900K, respectively,
where the latter value is in good agreement with the unit-cell parameter
of bulk Fe3O4 (8.396 Å). This trend among a values is unusual, as high-temperature annealing of oxide
NPs often results in solvent removal and annihilation of defects,
thus leading to decreasing a values.[10,15] In contrast, a substantial increase in the unit cell was observed
for our magnetite NPs. A possible reason for this increase is a partial
reduction of Fe3+ into Fe2+, which has a larger
ionic radius (0.64 Å vs 0.78 Å).[16]
Figure 2
XRD
patterns collected from magnetite NPs as-synthesized and after annealing
at 650 or 900 K. Tick marks below the patterns correspond to the positions
of the Bragg reflections expected for magnetite with a cubic inverse-spinel
structure (ICDD no. 00-019-629).
XRD
patterns collected from magnetite NPs as-synthesized and after annealing
at 650 or 900 K. Tick marks below the patterns correspond to the positions
of the Bragg reflections expected for magnetite with a cubic inverse-spinel
structure (ICDD no. 00-019-629).Iron oxide phases before and after annealing were investigated
by Raman scattering (Figure 3; Table S1, SI). The coexistence of magnetite with an admixture
of maghemite (γ-Fe2O3) is evidenced by
Lorentzian fitting of the Raman data for OL-HT NPs. Specifically,
the prominent bands centered at 680 and 703 cm–1 in the Raman spectrum of OL-HT are assigned to A1g phonon modes of Fe3O4 and γ-Fe2O3, respectively.[17] Additional
expected bands representing T2g and Eg phonon
modes of γ-Fe2O3 can also be observed
in the low-wavenumber region (351 and 495 cm–1).
The Raman spectra of the two annealed samples are similar to each
other, and the set of observed bands and spectrum features agrees
with the Raman data reported for phase-pure Fe3O4.[17] Notably, Lorentzian fitting of the
Raman data suggested that the annealed samples contained contributions
from γ-Fe2O3; however, the magnitudes
of the contributions were very low, as one can see from the large
values of the intensity and peak area ratios of the respective Fe3O4 and γ-Fe2O3 prominent
A1g bands (Table S1, SI). Thus,
Raman scattering points to a minor admixture of γ-Fe2O3 in both annealed products. Notably, the A1g mode of Fe3O4, seen in the Raman spectrum
of as-synthesized OL-HT at 680 cm–1, shifted to lower wavenumbers (668 cm–1) upon
annealing. Additionally, the width of this band decreased from 90
cm–1 for OL-HT to 38 cm–1 for OL-HT-900K, indicating that the crystalline quality
of magnetite increased with annealing, in good agreement with the
XRD data.
Figure 3
Raman scattering data collected from magnetite NPs as-synthesized
and after annealing at 650 and 900 K. Dotted lines mark the positions
of resolved bands.
Raman scattering data collected from magnetite NPs as-synthesized
and after annealing at 650 and 900 K. Dotted lines mark the positions
of resolved bands.TEM analysis was applied
to investigate the evolution of the structure, size, and morphology
of the Fe3O4 NPs with annealing. Figure 4a shows a typical low-magnification bright-field
(BF) TEM image of OL-HT. The average size of the NPs
was around 20 ± 3 nm. We note that all of the as-synthesized OL-HT NPs were spatially well-separated by the OL capping
shells (Figure 4a). In contrast, objects of
roughly the same size as OL-HT NPs in Figure 4a became aggregated in the annealed OL-HT-650K (Figure 4b). Presumably, after thermally
induced removal of the OL capping at 650 K, the NPs fused to reduce
their surface and interfacial energies, forming aggregates. At the
yet higher annealing temperature used for OL-HT-900K,
NP sintering occurred, resulting in the formation of bulky magnetite
products with a typical size of crystallites from 50 to 100 nm (Figures 4c and S1, SI). Electron
diffraction (ED) revealed high crystallinity of all of the products,
in agreement with the XRD results. The corresponding ED patterns (insets
in Figure 4) can be completely indexed based
on the cubic Fd3̅m magnetite
structure, using the unit-cell parameters determined by XRD.
Figure 4
Low-magnification
BF TEM images of NPs before and after annealing. NP morphologies and
(insets) corresponding ring ED patterns show microstructural changes
from (a) as-synthesized NPs to derived NPs annealed at (b) 650 and
(c) 900 K.
Low-magnification
BF TEM images of NPs before and after annealing. NP morphologies and
(insets) corresponding ring ED patterns show microstructural changes
from (a) as-synthesized NPs to derived NPs annealed at (b) 650 and
(c) 900 K.Figures 5a and S2 (SI) show representative BF HRTEM
images of OL-HT, wherein the NP surface is terminated
with columns of iron atoms and some of the particles exhibit defects,
in agreement with our previous report.[12] Annealing at 650 K removed these structural defects, as seen in
high-resolution HAADF-STEM images viewed along [001] and [111] zone
axes (Figure 5b,c). In contrast to the highly
crystalline surfaces of the OL-HT NPs, however, a 0.7–1.1-nm-thick
amorphous surface layer was clearly visible on the OL-HT-650K NPs in Figure 6 (top panel). STEM-EDX data
(Figure 6, bottom panel) suggest that this
layer most likely consisted of carbonaceous residues that formed during
thermal decomposition of the OL capping.
Figure 5
(a) [112] and [110] BF
HRTEM images of the as-synthesized OL-HT magnetite NPs
and (b,c) HAADF-STEM images of the annealed OL-HT-650K sample with magnetite NPs along the (b) [001] and (c) [111] zone
axes.
Figure 6
(Top) HAADF-STEM image of an annealed OL-HT-650K NP. Arrows mark an apparent carbonaceous layer
at the edge of the NP. (Bottom) HAADF-STEM image of OL-HT-650K NPs, together with the corresponding STEM-EDX maps showing C, Fe,
and O distributions.
(a) [112] and [110] BF
HRTEM images of the as-synthesized OL-HT magnetite NPs
and (b,c) HAADF-STEM images of the annealed OL-HT-650K sample with magnetite NPs along the (b) [001] and (c) [111] zone
axes.(Top) HAADF-STEM image of an annealed OL-HT-650K NP. Arrows mark an apparent carbonaceous layer
at the edge of the NP. (Bottom) HAADF-STEM image of OL-HT-650K NPs, together with the corresponding STEM-EDX maps showing C, Fe,
and O distributions.Figure 7 shows 57Fe Mössbauer
spectra of the as-synthesized OL-HT NPs and the annealed OL-HT-650K and OL-HT-900K derivatives; all of
the hyperfine parameters extracted from the measurements are summarized
in Table S2 (SI).
Figure 7
Comparison of the Mössbauer
spectra of as-synthesized OL-HT and annealed OL-HT-650K and OL-HT-900K samples collected at room temperature
(and at 80 K for OL-HT). Experimental data, circles;
calculated spectrum, black line; Fe2+ or Fe2.5+ component, red line; Fe3+ components: blue, green, and
orange lines.
Comparison of the Mössbauer
spectra of as-synthesized OL-HT and annealed OL-HT-650K and OL-HT-900K samples collected at room temperature
(and at 80 K for OL-HT). Experimental data, circles;
calculated spectrum, black line; Fe2+ or Fe2.5+ component, red line; Fe3+ components: blue, green, and
orange lines.The room-temperature
Mössbauer spectrum of as-synthesized OL-HT NPs
exhibits four components, one of which is very broad, probably due
to the superparamagnetic effect.[18−20] These component widths
make the fitting of the Mössbauer spectrum ambiguous; therefore,
this sample was measured at 80 K to obtain sharper spectral lines.
The 80 K spectrum also has four components, namely, Q1,
Q2, Q3, and Q4. Three components,
Q1, Q3, and Q4, have centroid shift
(δ) values ranging from 0.372 to 0.515 mm/s (Table S2, SI). These values are characteristic for Fe3+, taking into account the second-order Doppler shift. The
forth component, Q2, has a δ value of 0.856 mm/s
(Table S2, SI); such a high value of the
centroid shit can be assigned to Fe2+. The measurements
were performed below the charge-ordering Verwey transition,[21] which is 120 K for Fe3O4; therefore, a separate signal coming from Fe2+ in the
Fe3O4 octahedral site is expected, in accordance
with the results of Evans and Hafner.[22] The observed Fe2+ component had an intensity of 12% instead
of 33% expected for phase-pure bulk Fe3O4, where
the Fe3+/Fe2+ ratio is 2:1. Thus, the as-synthesized
sample contained ca. 36% magnetite and 64% of an Fe3+ phase,
which was presumably maghemite γ-Fe2O3, as indicated by Raman scattering (Figure 3).In contrast to OL-HT, derivative sample OL-HT-650K annealed at 650 K produced a room-temperature Mössbauer
spectrum without superparamagnetic broadening of its sharp lines,
which was fitted by four components (Table S2, SI). The Q2 component has a δ value of 0.635
mm/s, which is characteristic for Fe+2.5, that is, the
averaged Fe3+/Fe2+ signal from iron atoms in
the octahedral sites of magnetite. The measurement was performed above
the Verwey transition temperature; therefore, no charge ordering or
separation of Fe2+ and Fe3+ in the octahedral
positions was expected. The intensity of this combined signal was
36%, indicating that half of it, 18%, was from Fe2+. Hence,
the Mössbauer data indicate that annealing at 650 K led to
the reduction of part of the Fe3+ in the as-synthesized
sample to Fe2+, increasing the total fraction of Fe3O4 to 54%.Annealing of the as-synthesized
NPs at 900 K resulted in almost complete elimination of the putative
γ-Fe2O3 phase. The Mössbauer spectrum
of OL-HT-900K was fitted with only two components, Q1 and Q2 (Table S2, SI). Component Q2 has a δ value of 0.660 mm/s and
is from Fe+2.5 in the octahedral site. The intensity of
this component is 62%, which is close to the 67% value expected for
pure Fe3O4. The slightly lower intensity of
Q2 indicates that a small excess, ca. 7%, of Fe3+ is still present in the sample.
Discussion
The two striking phenomena we observed in the magnetic properties
of our NPs at high temperature—a dip in M(T) at ca. 602 K in the first heating curve and loops in
the subsequent cooling–heating M(T) curves in the 500–800 K temperature range—appear
to be different in nature; therefore, the first heating curve should
be considered separately from the subsequent ones.
Origin
of the Dip in M(T)
The
temperature at which the dip in M(T) was observed, 602 K, matches very well the decomposition temperature
of the OL ligand shell, 605 K, as detected by a combination of TGA/DSC
and mass spectrometry.[11,12] We hypothesize that the decomposition
of the organic coating has a significant impact on the magnetic properties
of NPs. To verify this assumption, we used a hydrothermal method to
synthesize a reference sample of ligand-free magnetite NPs. This reference
material did not feature a dip in M(T) upon heating (black curve, Figure 8a), confirming
that the dip observed for OL-functionalized NPs is associated with
the presence of the organic capping ligands and, more specifically,
with their thermal decomposition, based on the temperature at which
the dip occurred (Figures 1 and 8b). Therefore, we deduce that the dip in M(T) is most likely related to changes in the composition
or oxidation state of the iron oxide on the surface of the NPs, as
a consequence of the decomposition of the organic shell.
Figure 8
(a) One heating–cooling M(T) cycle for a reference magnetite sample
synthesized without organic coating (ligand-free magnetite) and for
an annealed sample (OL-HT-900K). (b) M(T) data for model magnetite NPs functionalized
with different organic capping ligands: poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP),
tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAOH), citrate (Ct), and poly(acrylic
acid) (PAA). All data were measured in a 10 kOe field.
(a) One heating–cooling M(T) cycle for a reference magnetite sample
synthesized without organic coating (ligand-free magnetite) and for
an annealed sample (OL-HT-900K). (b) M(T) data for model magnetite NPs functionalized
with different organic capping ligands: poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP),
tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAOH), citrate (Ct), and poly(acrylic
acid) (PAA). All data were measured in a 10 kOe field.Looking for evidence of these changes in composition
or oxidation state of the iron oxide, in fact, motivated our choice
of the 650 K annealing temperature for the OL-HT-650K derivative sample. Our Raman analysis suggested the γ-Fe2O3 phase in as-synthesized OL-HT to
be the most likely candidate for undergoing the transformation upon
heating. Indeed, after the sample had been annealed at 650 K, the
contribution of γ-Fe2O3 became quite small
(compare OL-HT and OL-HT-650K in Figure 3 and Table S1, SI). Mössbauer
analysis confirmed that, after the sample had been annealed at 650
K, the content of Fe2+ increased at the expense of Fe3+ (Figure 7; Table S2, SI). Thus, both Raman and Mössbauer analyses
point to the reduction of the Fe3+-rich surface layer,
which is characteristic of as-synthesized OL-HT NPs,[12] as the main change in iron oxide composition
of OL-HT upon annealing at 650 K.The in situ reducing
agent[23,24] for this apparent Fe3+ reduction
is suggested by its connection to the presence and thermal decomposition
of the organic capping ligands, as deduced from the M(T) features (Figure 8) and
from carbonaceous residues observed by HAADF-STEM and STEM-EDX (Figure 6). The reduction did not take place in the absence
of the putative reducing agent in ligand-free NPs, which did not exhibit
the dip feature (black curve in Figure 8a).The following model then
emerges to explain the dip in M(T) during the first heating of as-synthesized OL-HT NPs:
As-synthesized NPs contain a significant excess of Fe3+ both in the core and on the surface of the particles, forming Fe3O4–γ-Fe2O3 solid
solutions.[12] Upon the first heating above
ca. 600 K, the OL ligands decompose, and the carbonaceous product
of that decomposition induces the in situ reduction of part of the
excess Fe3+ on the NP surfaces. Although formation of secondary
metallic iron, iron carbide, or oxo-carbide phases can be expected
as a result of a carbon-induced reduction, our detailed characterization
did not reveal any major phase other than magnetite. Accordingly,
the reduction and associated magnetite-phase stabilization must produce
the dip in the magnetization. In particular, during the reduction,
the NPs likely exhibit chemical disorder associated with the migration
and redistribution of O and Fe ions. This disorder leads to the frustration
of Fe–O–Fe superexchange interactions, generating a
dip in M(T) until the reduction
is complete.[3,9,10,25]The remaining excess of Fe3+ detected by Mössbauer spectroscopy in OL-HT-650K (Figure 7; Table S2, SI) was likely situated in the core of the particles. Indirect
evidence of this Fe3+ localization is provided by minimal
changes in the unit-cell parameters (and, therefore, in the structure
of NP cores) upon annealing at 650 K (Figure 2). We note that, even in the annealed OL-HT-650K sample,
the original NPs were identifiable (Figure 4b), so the in situ reduction was largely confined within individual
NPs. A temperature of 650 K was thus not sufficient to produce a uniform
composition across an entire 20-nm NP. Temperature, rather than heating
time, was implicated as the primary limiting factor based on the observation
that, during magnetometry measurements, heating for just a few minutes
around 600 K was sufficient to complete the putative reduction reaction
on the NP surfaces (completion is inferred from the dip being unique
to the initial heating), whereas even the much longer (2-h) annealing
of OL-HT-650K did not extend the reaction to NP cores,
as indicated above (Figures 2 and 7; Table S2, SI).
Origin of M(T) Irreversibility
We observed a significant irreversibility in consecutive cooling
and heating profiles of M(T) in OL-HT, whereby starting from the second heating–cooling
cycle, the M value at 300 K increased after every
cycle (cycles 2 and 3 in Figure 1). Our analyses
of annealed OL-HT-650K and OL-HT-900K samples
by diffraction techniques (XRD in Figure 2 and
ED in Figure 4) and Raman scattering (Figure 3) did not reveal any phase transition in the temperature
range of the M(T) measurements,
but pointed to two types of gradual changes, namely, sintering and
equilibration of the Fe3O4 composition, as likely
explanations for the gradual recovery of M at 300
K.Owing to their small size, the NPs exhibit a high specific
surface area. Structurally, the surface of the NPs is disordered,
giving rise to a reasonable quantity of magnetically dead layer on
the particle surface. The series of TEM images in Figure 4 clearly indicates that, in the temperature range
of our M(T) measurements, NP sintering
occurred, promoted by both heating and reducing conditions[26] (the latter are discussed in more detail in
section 4.1). The gradual increase in the crystallite
size of magnetite with sintering is not only evident in the TEM images
(Figures 4c and S1, SI) but is also supported by the sharpest peaks in the XRD (Figure 2) and Raman (Figure 3) data
for the OL-HT-900K sample annealed at 900 K, that is,
at the high-temperature limit of our M(T) measurements. During the sintering, the particles grew, and accordingly,
their specific surface area decreased. The overall effect of the magnetically
dead layer then diminished, leading to the gradual increase in M.[27]Apart from the anticipated
sintering-induced size effect, the gradual recovery of M was also tracked down to the uncommon significant change in Fe3+/Fe2+ ratio with the heat treatment. As discussed
above, annealing at 650 K was not sufficient to reach the theoretical
Fe3O4 stoichiometry of Fe3+ and Fe2+ across an entire 20-nm NP. Analysis of Mössbauer
spectra for OL-HT-900K (Figure 7; Table S2, SI), however, clearly indicates
that the larger (50–100-nm) sintered particles produced by
annealing at 900 K exhibited a nearly uniform Fe3O4 composition. The uniformity of converting the initial excess
Fe3+ to Fe2+ across the entire volume of these
larger particles is further indicated by the increase of the unit-cell
parameter to the bulk Fe3O4 value (Figure 2) after annealing at 900 K, in contrast to the commonly
observed reduction in unit-cell parameters in annealed metal oxide
NPs.[10,15] This seemingly simple change in Fe3+/Fe2+ ratio is deceptive, as the compositional change
from ca. 46% to 7% of Fe2O3 significantly increased M, judging by the fact that the Ms value of Fe3O4 is higher than that of γ-Fe2O3.Thus, both sintering and uncommon equilibration
of the Fe3O4 composition would contribute to
the gradual increase of M in heating–cooling
cycles, because M is expected to increase with both
larger particle size and improved Fe3O4 crystallinity
and uniformity. Neither process, however, reached an end point or
equilibrium during the short high-temperature phase of each heating–cooling
cycle; therefore, divergent M(T)
curves depicting loops were produced as the sample gradually approached
its end-point configuration. This interpretation is supported by the
nearly reversible M(T) cycle for OL-HT-900K (red curve in Figure 8a),
which indicates that annealing for 2 h at 900 K was sufficient to
complete the sintering of the original NPs and equilibration of the
Fe3O4 composition throughout the resulting particles.
As 900 K was the highest temperature reached in every heating cycle,
the OL-HT-900K behavior confirms that, in this particular
case, heating time rather than temperature was the parameter limiting
the extent of NP transformation in each cycle.
Structure
and Composition Inferences and Models
Our extensive analysis
of the as-synthesized OL-HT NPs combined with measurements
of M(T) and of derivative samples
annealed at elevated temperatures provide the basis for the following
inferences about the structure and composition of OL-HT NPs.Iron oxide in as-synthesized OL-HT NPs is
best understood as an Fe3O4–γ-Fe2O3 solid solution with excess (beyond Fe3O4 stoichiometry) Fe3+ distributed throughout
the NPs, with indications of a possible enrichment at their surfaces.[12,28] γ-Fe2O3 and Fe3O4 have very similar crystal structures. Both powder XRD and (Figure 2) and high-resolution TEM (Figure 5a) indicate that the as-synthesized sample had a cubic inverse-spinel
structure, which is also the case for both pure Fe3O4 and Fe3O4–γ-Fe2O3 solid solution. Local Mössbauer spectroscopy
revealed the elevated Fe3+ to Fe2+ ratio in OL-HT (Figure 7; Table S2, SI); the associated γ-Fe2O3 phase was detected by Raman scattering (Figure 3).Indirect evidence of a possible enhancement of M by the capping OL ligands of OL-HT NPs comes
from a comparison of the initial M values for OL-HT (Figure 1) and OL-HT-900K (red curve in Figure 8a). As discussed above,
both the increased size of the particles in OL-HT-900K and its predominantly magnetite composition should increase the M value for this material. However, the initial M value at room temperature for OL-HT NPs before
thermal treatment was actually slightly higher than the M value at room temperature for OL-HT-900K, despite the
smaller NP size and structural/compositional imperfection of magnetite
in OL-HT. A higher amount of γ-Fe2O3 in OL-HT does not justify this difference in M, as Fe3O4 has an even higher magnetic
moment than γ-Fe2O3. Ligand enhancement
of M in OL-HT NPs provides a possible
interpretation of this apparent discrepancy.The above inferences
provide illustrations of how investigating the properties of magnetic
NPs at elevated temperatures can provide insights into the structure
and composition of as-synthesized NPs. These illustrations reinforce
our prospective that high-temperature measurements can be useful for
NPs that are intended for room-temperature applications. An example
of extending this analytical concept to investigating NPs capped with
common organic ligands is shown in Figure 8b. For each model colloidal magnetite NP, the dip in M(T) is observed at a specific temperature that closely
corresponds (within ≤3 K) to the sharp step in thermal decomposition
of the capping ligands: poly(vinylpyrrolidone),[29] tetramethylammonium hydroxide,[30] citrate,[31] and poly(acrylic acid).[11,12] Observation of a dip in M(T) at
a characteristic temperature, therefore, can be used to confirm the
identities of these common capping ligands.
Conclusions
We have observed complex irreversible behavior
of magnetization for OL-capped magnetite nanoparticles upon thermal
cycling in the 300–900 K temperature range. Two prominent features
of M(T) curves for these NPs are
(1) a dip in M(T) during the initial
heating and (2) an irreversibility of heating–cooling curves,
producing loops in subsequent cycles. Both features are related to
the thermal decomposition of the OL capping ligands. The dip in M(T) is due to the reduction of overoxidized
NP surfaces by carbonaceous decomposition products. The M(T) irreversibility results from gradual NP sintering
and uncommon compositional equilibration after reduction of overoxidized
NP cores, both of which are enabled after thermal decomposition of
the capping ligands.Our analysis of as-synthesized NPs, combined
with measurements of M(T) and of
derivative samples annealed at elevated temperatures, indicates that
iron oxide in as-synthesized colloids is best understood as an Fe3O4–γ-Fe2O3 solid
solution with excess Fe3+ present both in the NP cores
and on their overoxidized surfaces. We also found indirect evidence
of the M enhancement by capping ligands in as-synthesized
NPs.The novel analytical methodology demonstrated in this work
can be readily extended to structural and compositional analyses of
magnetic nanomaterials. Reversible M(T) curves indicate uniform structure and composition, as well as a
lack of organic capping ligands. Conversely, characteristic features
in irreversible M(T) curves provide
insights into the nature of structural or compositional uniformity,
as well as the identity of the organic capping ligands.
Authors: Noah J J Johnson; Neralagatta M Sangeetha; John-Christopher Boyer; Frank C J M van Veggel Journal: Nanoscale Date: 2010-03-04 Impact factor: 7.790
Authors: E Winkler; R D Zysler; M Vasquez Mansilla; D Fiorani; D Rinaldi; M Vasilakaki; K N Trohidou Journal: Nanotechnology Date: 2008-04-02 Impact factor: 3.874
Authors: Alice G Leonel; Alexandra A P Mansur; Sandhra M Carvalho; Luis Eugenio F Outon; José Domingos Ardisson; Klaus Krambrock; Herman S Mansur Journal: Nanoscale Adv Date: 2021-01-04