| Literature DB >> 35425373 |
Reza Eivazzadeh-Keihan1, Somayeh Asgharnasl1, Hooman Aghamirza Moghim Aliabadi2,3, Behnam Tahmasebi4, Fateme Radinekiyan1, Ali Maleki1, Hossein Bahreinizad5, Mohammad Mahdavi6, Mohammadhossein Shahsavari Alavijeh7, Reza Saber8,9, Senentxu Lanceros-Méndez10,11, Ahmed Esmail Shalan10,12.
Abstract
In this research, a novel magnetic nanobiocomposite was designed and synthesized in a mild condition, and its potential in an alternating magnetic field was evaluated for hyperthermia applications. For this purpose, in the first step, graphene oxide was functionalized with a natural lignin polymer using epichlorohydrin as the cross-linking agent. In the second step, the designed magnetic graphene oxide-lignin nanobiocomposite was fabricated by the in situ preparation of magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles in the presence of graphene oxide functionalized with lignin. The resultant magnetic nanobiocomposite possessed certain main properties, including stability and homogeneity in aqueous solutions, making it suitable for hyperthermia applications. The chemical and structural properties of the synthesized magnetic graphene oxide-lignin composite were characterized using FT-IR, EDX, FE-SEM, TEM, TG and VSM analyses. The saturation magnetization value of this magnetic nanocomposite was recorded as 17.2 emu g-1. Further, the maximum specific absorption rate was determined to be 121.22 W g-1. Given these results, this newly fabricated magnetic nanobiocomposite may achieve considerable performance under the alternating magnetic field in fluid hyperthermia therapy. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35425373 PMCID: PMC8979318 DOI: 10.1039/d1ra08640e
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 3.361
Scheme 1Synthesis process of the magnetic GO–lignin nanobiocomposite.
Fig. 1FT-IR spectra of (A) GO, (B) GO–lignin, and (C) the magnetic GO–lignin nanobiocomposite.
Fig. 2(A) The EDX spectrum and (B) elemental mapping images of the magnetic GO–lignin nanobiocomposite.
Fig. 3FE-SEM images of (A) GO, (B) GO–lignin, and (C) the magnetic GO–lignin nanobiocomposite.
Fig. 4TEM image of the magnetic GO–lignin nanobiocomposite.
Fig. 5TG curve of the magnetic GO–lignin nanobiocomposite.
Fig. 6Hysteresis loop curves of bare Fe3O4 MNPs and the magnetic GO–lignin nanobiocomposite.
Fig. 7Relation between the SAR and different concentrations of the synthetic magnetic GO–lignin nanocomposite at different AMR frequencies.
Fig. 8Variation of the maximum SAR of each magnetic sample with time.
The comparative evaluation of the magnetic GO–lignin nanobiocomposite with other nanomaterials reported for use in the hyperthermia process
| Entry | MNPs | Nanocomposite | Optimum concentration of nanocomposite (mg mL−1) | SAR (W g−1) | Magnetic saturation (emu g−1) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fe3O4 | Magnetic Fe3O4 | 15 | 18.5 | 58.8 |
|
| 2 | Fe3O4 | Poly (acrylic acid) coated Fe3O4 | 15 | 46.64 | 72.38 |
|
| 3 | Fe3O4 | Oleate coated Fe3O4 | 15 | 51.90 | 72.38 |
|
| 4 | Fe3O4 | Brick-like Ag@Fe3O4 | 1 | 100 | 37 |
|
| 5 | Fe3O4 | Fe3O4–chitosan | 2 | 118.85 | 49.96 |
|
| 6 | Fe3O4 | Graphene oxide–Fe3O4 | 1 | 98 | 78 |
|
| 7 | Fe3O4 | Magnetic GO–lignin | 0.5 | 121.22 | 17.2 | This work |