| Literature DB >> 25506322 |
Róbert Bódizs1, Ferenc Gombos2, Péter P Ujma3, Ilona Kovács2.
Abstract
Evidence supports the intricate relationship between sleep electroencephalogram (EEG) spindling and cognitive abilities in children and adults. Although sleep EEG changes during adolescence index fundamental brain reorganization, a detailed analysis of sleep spindling and the spindle-intelligence relationship was not yet provided for adolescents. Therefore, adolescent development of sleep spindle oscillations were studied in a home polysomnographic study focusing on the effects of chronological age and developmentally acquired overall mental efficiency (fluid IQ) with sex as a potential modulating factor. Subjects were 24 healthy adolescents (12 males) with an age range of 15-22 years (mean: 18 years) and fluid IQ of 91-126 (mean: 104.12, Raven Progressive Matrices Test). Slow spindles (SSs) and fast spindles (FSs) were analyzed in 21 EEG derivations by using the individual adjustment method (IAM). A significant age-dependent increase in average FS density (r = 0.57; p = 0.005) was found. Moreover, fluid IQ correlated with FS density (r = 0.43; p = 0.04) and amplitude (r = 0.41; p = 0.049). The latter effects were entirely driven by particularly reliable FS-IQ correlations in females [r = 0.80 (p = 0.002) and r = 0.67 (p = 0.012), for density and amplitude, respectively]. Region-specific analyses revealed that these correlations peak in the fronto-central regions. The control of the age-dependence of FS measures and IQ scores did not considerably reduce the spindle-IQ correlations with respect to FS density. The only positive spindle-index of fluid IQ in males turned out to be the frequency of FSs (r = 0.60, p = 0.04). Increases in FS density during adolescence may index reshaped structural connectivity related to white matter maturation in the late developing human brain. The continued development over this age range of cognitive functions is indexed by specific measures of sleep spindling unraveling gender differences in adolescent brain maturation and perhaps cognitive strategy.Entities:
Keywords: EEG; IQ; Raven Progressive Matrices Test; adolescence; gender; sigma waves; sleep spindling
Year: 2014 PMID: 25506322 PMCID: PMC4246682 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00952
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Hum Neurosci ISSN: 1662-5161 Impact factor: 3.169
Descriptive statistics of sleep architectural variables*.
| Mean | Min | Max | SD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time in bed (min) | 521.65 | 399.00 | 639.33 | 59.29 |
| Total sleep time (min) | 494.33 | 368.33 | 617.00 | 54.60 |
| Sleep efficiency (%) | 94.84 | 85.25 | 99.09 | 3.36 |
| Wake time (min) | 27.31 | 4.33 | 85.00 | 19.03 |
| Relative wake time (%) | 5.15 | 0.90 | 14.74 | 3.36 |
| WASO (min) | 19.50 | 1.00 | 81.66 | 19.02 |
| Sleep latency (min) | 10.72 | 2.00 | 38.00 | 10.09 |
| NREM time (min) | 365.86 | 302.00 | 447.00 | 38.33 |
| Relative NREM time (%) | 74.16 | 66.28 | 81.99 | 4.00 |
| S1 time (min) | 10.68 | 3.00 | 33.66 | 6.36 |
| Relative S1 time (%) | 2.16 | 0.62 | 6.28 | 1.23 |
| S2 time (min) | 294.34 | 208.33 | 386.00 | 49.70 |
| Relative S2 time (%) | 59.59 | 43.61 | 75.83 | 7.93 |
| SWS time (min) | 60.83 | 3.00 | 162.33 | 37.15 |
| Relative SWS time (%) | 12.40 | 0.56 | 33.98 | 7.70 |
| REM time (min) | 128.47 | 66.33 | 170.00 | 27.35 |
| Relative REM time (%) | 25.83 | 18.00 | 33.71 | 4.00 |
| REM latency (min) | 79.02 | 44.66 | 150.00 | 28.08 |
| Number of sleep cycles | 5.08 | 4.00 | 8.00 | 0.97 |
| Average REM period time (min) | 25.63 | 15.66 | 34.75 | 5.23 |
| Average sleep cycle time (min) | 99.35 | 74.83 | 133.91 | 15.32 |
*S1—Stage 1 sleep; S2—Stage 2 sleep; SWS—slow wave sleep; WASO—wake after sleep onset.
Descriptive statistics on sleep spindling*.
| Mean | Min | Max | SD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SS frequency (Hz) | 11.28 | 9.88 | 13.10 | 0.83 |
| Average SS density (spindles×min−1) | 6.83 | 4.45 | 9.29 | 1.46 |
| Frontal SS density (spindles×min−1) | 7.14 | 5.17 | 9.18 | 1.14 |
| Centroparietal SS density (spindles×min−1) | 6.68 | 4.06 | 9.35 | 1.56 |
| Temporal SS density (spindles×min−1) | 6.73 | 4.00 | 9.60 | 1.70 |
| Occipital SS density (spindles×min−1) | 6.46 | 2.85 | 9.58 | 2.03 |
| Average SS duration (s) | 1.41 | 0.86 | 2.58 | 0.54 |
| Frontal SS duration (s) | 1.48 | 0.89 | 2.63 | 0.53 |
| Centroparietal SS duration (s) | 1.39 | 0.85 | 2.56 | 0.54 |
| Temporal SS duration (s) | 1.38 | 0.83 | 2.53 | 0.54 |
| Occipital SS duration (s) | 1.33 | 0.76 | 2.55 | 0.55 |
| Average SS amplitude (µV) | 3.48 | 1.30 | 6.91 | 1.65 |
| Frontal SS amplitude (µV) | 4.42 | 1.50 | 9.86 | 2.25 |
| Centroparietal SS amplitude (µV) | 3.64 | 1.39 | 7.21 | 1.72 |
| Temporal SS amplitude (µV) | 2.26 | 0.84 | 4.24 | 1.02 |
| Occipital SS amplitude (µV) | 2.34 | 0.80 | 4.89 | 1.10 |
| FS frequency (Hz) | 13.29 | 12.55 | 14.24 | 0.47 |
| Average FS density (spindles×min−1) | 7.27 | 5.50 | 8.29 | 0.75 |
| Frontal FS density (spindles×min−1) | 6.59 | 5.07 | 7.73 | 0.75 |
| Centroparietal FS density (spindles×min−1) | 8.11 | 6.58 | 9.74 | 0.75 |
| Temporal FS density (spindles×min−1) | 7.20 | 5.23 | 8.57 | 0.92 |
| Occipital FS density (spindles×min−1) | 7.45 | 4.86 | 9.01 | 0.93 |
| Average FS duration (s) | 1.10 | 0.89 | 1.29 | 0.09 |
| Frontal FS duration (s) | 1.02 | 0.86 | 1.16 | 0.07 |
| Centroparietal FS duration (s) | 1.21 | 0.97 | 1.45 | 0.10 |
| Temporal FS duration (s) | 1.07 | 0.88 | 1.29 | 0.09 |
| Occipital FS duration (s) | 1.15 | 0.86 | 1.40 | 0.11 |
| Average FS amplitude (µV) | 5.10 | 3.45 | 7.08 | 1.04 |
| Frontal FS amplitude (µV) | 4.88 | 2.95 | 7.02 | 1.08 |
| Centroparietal FS amplitude (µV) | 7.16 | 4.64 | 10.38 | 1.60 |
| Temporal FS amplitude (µV) | 3.26 | 2.42 | 4.37 | 0.50 |
| Occipital FS amplitude (µV) | 4.01 | 2.08 | 5.74 | 1.10 |
*SS—slow spindle, FS—fast spindle.
Figure 1Scatterplot revealing the age-dependent increase in sleep EEG fast spindle (FS) density of adolescents.
Figure 2Significance probability map for the region-specific correlations depicting the age-related increase in sleep EEG FS densities. P-values are plotted on inverted logarithmic scale.
Figure 3Gender-specific sleep EEG FS density vs. IQ relationship in adolescents. (A) Scatterplot representing the frontal midline FS density vs. IQ relationship. (B) Significance probability map of the FS density vs. IQ correlations in females. (C) Significance probability map of the FS density vs. IQ correlations in males. P-values are plotted on inverted logarithmic scale.
Figure 4Gender-specific sleep EEG FS amplitude vs. IQ relationship in adolescents. (A) Scatterplot representing the frontal midline FS amplitude vs. IQ relationship. (B) Significance probability map of the FS amplitude vs. IQ correlations in females. (C) Significance probability map of the FS amplitude vs. IQ correlations in males. P-values are plotted on inverted logarithmic scale.
Figure 5Age-independence of the sleep EEG FS density vs. IQ relationship in females. (A) Scatterplot representing the partial correlations between FS density and IQ (both were residualized for age). (B) Significance probability map of the FS density vs. IQ partial correlations (effects of age partialled out) in females. (C) Significance probability map of the FS density vs. IQ partial correlations (effects of age partialled out) in males. P-values are plotted on inverted logarithmic scale.
Figure 6Scatterplot representing the correlation between sleep EEG FS frequency and IQ in males.
Figure 7Correlations between NREM sleep EEG spectral power of 8–16 Hz frequency and IQ in males. Graphs are indicating region-specific correlations as revealed at different scalp locations. Horizontal lines denote critical values for p < 0.05. (A) Binwise spectral data were log-transformed (10th base) before implementing correlation analyses. Positive correlations of NREM sleep EEG 13.75–15 Hz spectral power at derivations F3, C3 and C4 with IQ (red arrows) are significant after controlling for multiple testing according to the procedure of descriptive data analysis. (B) Binwise spectral data were z-transformed before implementing correlation analyses. Negative correlations of NREM sleep EEG 12–13.25 Hz spectral power at derivations C3, C4, P3, P4, Pz, T3, T4, T5, T6, O1, O2 and Oz with IQ (red arrows) are significant after controlling for multiple testing according to the procedure of descriptive data analysis.