Literature DB >> 25504378

Family directed umbilical cord blood banking for acute leukemia: usage rate in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

M Screnci1, E Murgi, A Tamburini, M R Pecci, G Ballatore, A Cusanno, V Valle, P Luciani, F Corona, G Girelli.   

Abstract

Family-directed umbilical cord blood (UCB) collection and banking is indicated in women delivering healthy babies who already have a member of their own family with a disease potentially treatable with an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell (HSCs) transplantation (HSCT). The rapid availability of UCB is an important issue in HSCs procurement particularly for recipients with acute leukemia who urgently need HSCT. The aims of this study were to assess the usage rate of family UCB collections directed to patients with acute leukemia and to investigate the factors influencing the usage rate. A total of 113 families were enrolled, 118 UCB units were successfully collected and one collection failed due to emergency occurred during delivery. Among these, 7 collections were required for children who were in urgent need of a transplant: three HLA-matched units were successfully transplanted, respectively after 2, 5 and 6 months from collection; three collections resulted HLA-mismatched, while HLA-typing is pending for one unit. The remaining collections were mostly required for potential future use, among these units only one was transplanted in a HLA compatible sibling after 3 years and 4 months from collection. After a median time of storage of 8.5 years (range 0.1-20 years) a total of 4/118 (3.4 %) collection has been transplanted. During this time interval, considering only patients who have had the need of a transplant, the main factor influencing low utilization rate of UCB collections was due to HLA disparity, indeed among typed UCB unit mostly (77 %) resulted HLA mismatched with the intended recipient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25504378     DOI: 10.1007/s12015-014-9579-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep        ISSN: 2629-3277            Impact factor:   5.739


  12 in total

1.  Long-term follow-up and factors influencing outcomes after related HLA-identical cord blood transplantation for patients with malignancies: an analysis on behalf of Eurocord-EBMT.

Authors:  Andrée-Laure Herr; Nabil Kabbara; Carmem M S Bonfim; Pierre Teira; Franco Locatelli; Karin Tiedemann; Arjan Lankester; Jean-Pierre Jouet; Chiara Messina; Yves Bertrand; Cristina Díaz de Heredia; Christina Peters; Wagnara Chaves; Samir K Nabhan; Irina Ionescu; Eliane Gluckman; Vanderson Rocha
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Haploidentical related umbilical cord blood stem cell transplant in a child with acute non-lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  H M Katzenstein; E R Morgan; M Olsewski; K Danner-Koptik; M Kletzel
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 3.  Back to the future: mismatched unrelated donor, haploidentical related donor, or unrelated umbilical cord blood transplantation?

Authors:  Claudio Anasetti; Franco Aversa; Claudio G Brunstein
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Family-directed umbilical cord blood banking.

Authors:  Eliane Gluckman; Annalisa Ruggeri; Vanderson Rocha; Etienne Baudoux; Michael Boo; Joanne Kurtzberg; Kathy Welte; Cristina Navarrete; Suzanna M van Walraven
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 9.941

5.  Low usage rate of banked sibling cord blood units in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for children with hematological malignancies: implications for directed cord blood banking policies.

Authors:  Evgenios Goussetis; Ioulia Peristeri; Vasiliki Kitra; Andreas C Papassavas; Maria Theodosaki; Eftichia Petrakou; Antonia Spiropoulos; Anna Paisiou; Alexandra Soldatou; Catherine Stavropoulos-Giokas; Stelios Graphakos
Journal:  Blood Cells Mol Dis       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Directed sibling cord blood banking for transplantation: the 10-year experience in the national blood service in England.

Authors:  Jon Smythe; Sue Armitage; Dorothy McDonald; Derwood Pamphilon; Martin Guttridge; Juliette Brown; Ann Green; Colin Brown; Ruth M Warwick; Alan Lankester; Deirdre Fehily; Marcela Contreras; Cristina Navarrete; Suzanne M Watt
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 6.277

7.  Haploidentical, unmanipulated, G-CSF-primed bone marrow transplantation for patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  Paolo Di Bartolomeo; Stella Santarone; Gottardo De Angelis; Alessandra Picardi; Laura Cudillo; Raffaella Cerretti; Gaspare Adorno; Stefano Angelini; Marco Andreani; Lidia De Felice; Maria Cristina Rapanotti; Loredana Sarmati; Pasqua Bavaro; Gabriele Papalinetti; Marta Di Nicola; Franco Papola; Mauro Montanari; Arnon Nagler; William Arcese
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Cord blood unit access and selection: 2010 and beyond: best practices and emerging trends in cord blood unit selection.

Authors:  Michael Boo; Karen Ballen; Martin Maiers
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Umbilical cord blood transplantation: the first 25 years and beyond.

Authors:  Karen K Ballen; Eliane Gluckman; Hal E Broxmeyer
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Comprehensive banking of sibling donor cord blood for children with malignant and nonmalignant disease.

Authors:  William Reed; Renée Smith; Florinna Dekovic; Joanna Y Lee; Julie D Saba; Elizabeth Trachtenberg; Joanna Epstein; Steffany Haaz; Mark C Walters; Bertram H Lubin
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-08-08       Impact factor: 22.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.