Literature DB >> 20538797

Long-term follow-up and factors influencing outcomes after related HLA-identical cord blood transplantation for patients with malignancies: an analysis on behalf of Eurocord-EBMT.

Andrée-Laure Herr1, Nabil Kabbara, Carmem M S Bonfim, Pierre Teira, Franco Locatelli, Karin Tiedemann, Arjan Lankester, Jean-Pierre Jouet, Chiara Messina, Yves Bertrand, Cristina Díaz de Heredia, Christina Peters, Wagnara Chaves, Samir K Nabhan, Irina Ionescu, Eliane Gluckman, Vanderson Rocha.   

Abstract

We analyzed risk factors influencing outcomes after related (R) human leukocyte antigen-identical cord blood transplantation (CBT) for 147 patients with malignancies reported to Eurocord-European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. CBT has been performed since 1990; median follow-up was 6.7 years. Median patient age was 5 years. Acute leukemia was the most frequent diagnosis (74%). At CBT, 40 patients had early, 70 intermediate, and 37 advanced disease. CB grafts contained a median of 4.1 × 10(7)/kg total nucleated cells (TNCs) after thawing. The cumulative incidence (CI) of neutrophil recovery was 90% at day +60. CIs of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were 12% and 10% at 2 years, respectively. At 5 years, CIs of nonrelapse mortality and relapse were 9% and 47%, respectively; the probability of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival were 44% and 55%, respectively. Among other factors, higher TNCs infused was associated with rapid neutrophil recovery and improved DFS. The use of methotrexate as GVHD prophylaxis decreased the CI of engraftment. Patients without advanced disease had improved DFS. These results support banking and use of CB units for RCBT. Cell dose, GVHD prophylaxis not including methotrexate, and disease status are important factors for outcomes after RCBT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20538797     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-02-271692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  7 in total

1.  Trends in cord blood banking.

Authors:  Isidro Prat Arrojo; María del Carmen Hernández Lamas; Laura Ponce Verdugo; Pascual Rizo Alfaro; Rebeca Rodríguez Pena; Francisco Sánchez Gordo; Pilar Gómez Maldonado; Gracia García Gémar
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 2.  Family-directed umbilical cord blood banking.

Authors:  Eliane Gluckman; Annalisa Ruggeri; Vanderson Rocha; Etienne Baudoux; Michael Boo; Joanne Kurtzberg; Kathy Welte; Cristina Navarrete; Suzanna M van Walraven
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 3.  Cord Blood Banking for Potential Future Transplantation.

Authors:  William T Shearer; Bertram H Lubin; Mitchell S Cairo; Luigi D Notarangelo
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 4.  Biomarkers in chronic graft-versus-host disease.

Authors:  Jacob Rozmus; Kirk R Schultz
Journal:  Expert Rev Hematol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.929

5.  Donating umbilical cord blood to a public bank or storing it in a private bank: knowledge and preference of blood donors and of pregnant women.

Authors:  Maria Screnci; Emilia Murgi; Guglielma Pirrè; Elisabetta Valente; Paola Gesuiti; Francesca Corona; Gabriella Girelli
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.443

6.  Family directed umbilical cord blood banking for acute leukemia: usage rate in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  M Screnci; E Murgi; A Tamburini; M R Pecci; G Ballatore; A Cusanno; V Valle; P Luciani; F Corona; G Girelli
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 7.  Umbilical cord blood transplantation: the first 25 years and beyond.

Authors:  Karen K Ballen; Eliane Gluckman; Hal E Broxmeyer
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 22.113

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.