Jia Liu1, Lu-ning Wang, Jian-ping Jia. 1. Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Beijing, 100053, China, Jason_liu1984@163.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common neurodegenerative disease in the elderly, and close associations between AD and diabetes have been found. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-γ) agonists, as newly-developed oral hypoglycaemic agents, were evaluated as a possible therapy for AD. AIM: We systematically evaluated the efficacy and safety of PPAR-γ agonists in the treatment of AD and amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), the prodromal stage of AD. METHODS: A search of the electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (until July 2014) was conducted, and included randomized controlled trials. Dichotomous data were expressed as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and continuous data were expressed as mean differences (MD) with 95% CIs. The results were pooled using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Nine eligible studies were identified, with 4,327 participants. Using the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale, pioglitazone was found to be efficacious, especially for patients with comorbid diabetes (MD -3.47, 95% CI -4.40 to -2.54). Rosiglitazone was not efficacious, even for apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 non-carriers (MD -0.31, 95% CI -1.12 to 0.51). There was no increase in any adverse events (AEs) or serious AEs compared with placebo. Peripheral edema was the most frequent AE related to PPAR-γ agonist treatment (RR 4.14, 95% CI 2.37-7.23). CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to support the use of rosiglitazone in aMCI and AD patients in order to improve cognitive performance. Nonetheless, the efficacy of pioglitazone seems to be promising, particularly for patients with comorbid diabetes, however this needs to be further confirmed by well-designed trials with large sample sizes. PPAR-γ agonists such as rosiglitazone and pioglitazone are generally well-tolerated in AD and aMCI patients.
BACKGROUND:Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common neurodegenerative disease in the elderly, and close associations between AD and diabetes have been found. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-γ) agonists, as newly-developed oral hypoglycaemic agents, were evaluated as a possible therapy for AD. AIM: We systematically evaluated the efficacy and safety of PPAR-γ agonists in the treatment of AD and amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), the prodromal stage of AD. METHODS: A search of the electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (until July 2014) was conducted, and included randomized controlled trials. Dichotomous data were expressed as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and continuous data were expressed as mean differences (MD) with 95% CIs. The results were pooled using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Nine eligible studies were identified, with 4,327 participants. Using the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale, pioglitazone was found to be efficacious, especially for patients with comorbid diabetes (MD -3.47, 95% CI -4.40 to -2.54). Rosiglitazone was not efficacious, even for apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 non-carriers (MD -0.31, 95% CI -1.12 to 0.51). There was no increase in any adverse events (AEs) or serious AEs compared with placebo. Peripheral edema was the most frequent AE related to PPAR-γ agonist treatment (RR 4.14, 95% CI 2.37-7.23). CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to support the use of rosiglitazone in aMCI and ADpatients in order to improve cognitive performance. Nonetheless, the efficacy of pioglitazone seems to be promising, particularly for patients with comorbid diabetes, however this needs to be further confirmed by well-designed trials with large sample sizes. PPAR-γ agonists such as rosiglitazone and pioglitazone are generally well-tolerated in AD and aMCI patients.
Authors: Cleusa P Ferri; Martin Prince; Carol Brayne; Henry Brodaty; Laura Fratiglioni; Mary Ganguli; Kathleen Hall; Kazuo Hasegawa; Hugh Hendrie; Yueqin Huang; Anthony Jorm; Colin Mathers; Paulo R Menezes; Elizabeth Rimmer; Marcia Scazufca Journal: Lancet Date: 2005-12-17 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Sofia Tzimopoulou; Vincent J Cunningham; Thomas E Nichols; Graham Searle; Nick P Bird; Prafull Mistry; Ian J Dixon; William A Hallett; Brandon Whitcher; Andrew P Brown; Marina Zvartau-Hind; Narinder Lotay; Robert Y K Lai; Mary Castiglia; Barbara Jeter; Julian C Matthews; Kewei Chen; Dan Bandy; Eric M Reiman; Michael Gold; Eugenii A Rabiner; Paul M Matthews Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2010 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Miranda J Spratlen; Frederica P Perera; Sally Ann Lederman; Virginia A Rauh; Morgan Robinson; Kurunthachalam Kannan; Leonardo Trasande; Julie Herbstman Journal: Environ Pollut Date: 2020-03-26 Impact factor: 8.071