Literature DB >> 27482223

Rosiglitazone ameliorates diffuse axonal injury by reducing loss of tau and up-regulating caveolin-1 expression.

Yong-Lin Zhao1, Jin-Ning Song1, Xu-Dong Ma1, Bin-Fei Zhang1, Dan-Dong Li1, Hong-Gang Pang1.   

Abstract

Rosiglitazone up-regulates caveolin-1 levels and has neuroprotective effects in both chronic and acute brain injury. Therefore, we postulated that rosiglitazone may ameliorate diffuse axonal injury via its ability to up-regulate caveolin-1, inhibit expression of amyloid-beta precursor protein, and reduce the loss and abnormal phosphorylation of tau. In the present study, intraperitoneal injection of rosiglitazone significantly reduced the levels of amyloid-beta precursor protein and hyperphosphorylated tau (phosphorylated at Ser(404)(p-tau (S(404))), and it increased the expression of total tau and caveolin-1 in the rat cortex. Our results show that rosiglitazone inhibits the expression of amyloid-beta precursor protein and lowers p-tau (S(404)) levels, and it reduces the loss of total tau, possibly by up-regulating caveolin-1. These actions of rosiglitazone may underlie its neuroprotective effects in the treatment of diffuse axonal injury.

Entities:  

Keywords:  amyloid precursor protein; caveolin-1; cortex; diffuse axonal injury; hyperphosphorylated tau; immunocytochemistry; nerve regeneration; neural regeneration; rats; rosiglitazone; ser404; total tau; western blot assay

Year:  2016        PMID: 27482223      PMCID: PMC4962592          DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.184493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neural Regen Res        ISSN: 1673-5374            Impact factor:   5.135


Introduction

There is an urgent need for more effective treatments for traumatic brain injury, including diffuse axonal injury (DAI). In this study, we examined whether rosiglitazone (RSG), a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPAR-γ) agonist, may have therapeutic potential for DAI. DAI initiates a series of pathophysiological changes including inflammation and glutamate excitotoxicity, resulting in neurodegeneration, neuronal death and neurological dysfunction (Chelly et al., 2011). During axonal degeneration, hyperphosphorylated microtubule-associated protein tau dissociates from microtubules, leading to total tau loss, microtubule destabilization and morphological changes in axons (Dong et al., 2014; Lv et al., 2014). As a consequence, amyloid-beta precursor protein (β-APP) accumulates rapidly and massively, serving as a sensitive biomarker for diagnosis of DAI (Li et al., 2010). Although there are many promising drug and cell-based therapeutic approaches for reducing brain injury and enhancing functional outcome after DAI, the clinical effectiveness of these approaches is limited (Xiong et al., 2009). Consequently, further research is needed to explore new therapeutic strategies for DAI. RSG is a Food and Drug Administration-approved drug with few short-term side effects, and is an excellent candidate for rapid translation to clinical trials. RSG is currently in Phase III clinical trials for Alzheimer's disease, based on its ability to reduce β-amyloid pathology and inflammation (Liu et al., 2015). RSG has been reported to reduce neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, apoptotic markers and lesion volume in mouse models of traumatic brain injury (Yonutas et al., 2013; Yao et al., 2015). However, few studies have investigated whether RSG affects tau phosphorylation or tau loss, which are pathological features of both Alzheimer's disease and DAI (Xu et al., 2014). Cheng et al. (2014) reported that RSG suppresses the proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells by up-regulating caveolin-1, and that it attenuates cerebral vasospasm following experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage. The up-regulation of caveolin-1 by RSG may also impact β-APP levels and tau hyperphosphorylation (Hattori et al., 2006; Head et al., 2010). However, it remains unknown whether RSG has therapeutic efficacy for DAI. In the present study, we investigated whether intraperitoneal injection of RSG rescues the axonal pathology in rats with DAI, and we examined the underlying mechanisms.

Materials and Methods

Animals

A total of 108 male 8–10-week-old Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 280–320 g were purchased from the Experimental Animal Center of Xi’an Jiaotong University of China (license No. SCXK (Shaanxi) 2006-001). Animals were housed and fed in a temperature- and humidity-controlled environment with a standardized 12-hour reversed light-dark cycle for 1 week. This study was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. The protocol was approved by the Biomedical Ethics Committee of Medical College of Xi’an Jiaotong University of China (2014-124).

Establishment of a rat model of DAI and RSG administration

To investigate changes in levels of β-APP, hyperphosphorylated tau (phosphorylated at serine 404 (p-tau (S404)) and total tau after DAI, and to evaluate the effect of RSG, 84 rats were randomly assigned to 7 groups (n = 12 per group) as follows: control group, DAI 6 hour (h) group, DAI 1 day (d) group, DAI 3 d group, DAI 7 d group, DAI 3 d + saline group (the same as the DAI 3 d group, but given intraperitoneal injection of saline at 5 minutes, 24 h and 48 h post DAI), and DAI 3 d + RSG group (the same as the DAI 3 d + saline group, but administered RSG (Cayman Chemical Co., Ann Arbor, MI, USA), 10 mg/kg intraperitoneal injection, diluted with saline to a final concentration of 2 mg/mL prior to injection). Rats were euthanized at the indicated time points post injury. The DAI model was established using a lateral head rotation device, which was created by our team (Li et al., 2013). After anesthesia with 30 g/L pentobarbital sodium (intraperitoneal injection, 30 mg/kg), the rat's head was horizontally secured to the lateral head rotation device by two lateral ear bars, a head clip and an anterior teeth hole, with its body at a 30° angle with respect to the top of the laboratory table. When the trigger was pushed, the rat head was rapidly rotated 90°, involving sudden acceleration and deceleration. All injured rats were in a coma for at least 30 minutes. The control group only underwent anesthesia and fixation to the device. Rats that died because of injury were excluded and later replaced by new rats.

Hematoxylin-eosin staining

To ensure that the animal model of DAI used in this study was successful, hematoxylin-eosin staining was performed. Rats in each group were deeply anesthetized and perfused with 250 mL of normal saline followed by 400 mL of 40 g/L paraformaldehyde. The whole brain was removed and post-fixed in paraformaldehyde. All tissues were desiccated, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned into 5-μm-thick sections. Three sections per animal were processed for hematoxylin-eosin staining. Hematoxylin-eosin-stained sections were observed at 400× magnification (BX-40; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

Semi-quantitative immunohistochemical staining

Brain sections were de-paraffinized in xylene and rehydrated in a decreasing graded alcohol series and distilled water. Endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched with 3% H2O2 for 15 minutes, followed by a wash in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Sections were placed in 0.01 M citrate buffer and heated in a microwave oven at 95°C for 30 minutes. Sections were cooled at room temperature for 40 minutes and rinsed in PBS. Non-specific protein binding was blocked with normal goat serum at room temperature for 30 minutes, followed by incubation with primary antibodies—rabbit anti-caveolin-1 monoclonal antibody (3267P, 1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), rabbit anti-tau (phospho S404) polyclonal antibody (ab131338, 1:200; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) or rabbit anti-β-APP monoclonal antibody (ab32136, 1:100; Abcam)—for 24 hours at 4°C, followed by a 15-minute wash in PBS. Sections were then incubated with goat anti-rabbit IgG-biotin for 30 minutes (sp9001, 1:200; ZSGB-BIO Co., Beijing, China) followed by streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase for 30 minutes at 37°C. Sections were washed with PBS for 15 minutes after each step. Diaminobenzidine was used as the chromogen, and hematoxylin was used as the counterstain. Microscopic observation of the immunohistochemically-stained sections was performed by an experienced pathologist blinded to the experimental conditions. Six animals in each group and five sections per animal were chosen for quantitative analysis. Under a light microscope (Olympus), each section was scored in five random visual fields at 400× magnification. Immunoreactivity was scored based on the number of positive cells and staining intensity using Image-Pro Plus 6.0 software (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD, USA). The immunohistochemical score was obtained by multiplying the staining quantity and intensity scores (Soslow et al., 2000). The staining quantity was rated on a scale of 0–4 as follows: 0, no staining; 1, 1–10% cells stained; 2, 11–50%; 3, 51–80%; and 4, 81–100%. Staining intensity was rated on a scale of 0–3 as follows: 0, negative; 1, weak; 2, moderate; and 3, strong. Theoretically, the scores can range from 0 to 12. An immunohistochemical score of 9–12 was considered to indicate strong immunoreactivity; 5–8, moderate; 1–4, weak; and 0, negative.

Western blot assay

Rats were anesthetized, and the cortex was immediately removed and stored in liquid nitrogen until processing. Total protein was purified using radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). Protein samples (20 μg) were analyzed with 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Proteins were transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). The membranes were blocked with 5% skimmed milk powder in Tris-buffered saline/Tween 20 buffer (TBST) for 2 hours at room temperature, and incubated overnight with rabbit anti-tau (phospho S404) polyclonal antibody (ab131338, 1:1,000; Abcam), rabbit anti-β-APP monoclonal antibody (ab32136, 1:1,000; Abcam), mouse anti-tau (tau46) monoclonal antibody (4019P, 1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology) or monoclonal rabbit anti-caveolin-1 antibody (3267P, 1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology). Membranes were washed three times with TBST for 10 minutes each, and then incubated with goat anti-rabbit IgG-horseradish peroxidase secondary antibody (ab6721, 1:3,000; Abcam) or goat anti-mouse IgG-horseradish peroxidase secondary antibody (ab97023, 1:3,000; Abcam) for 1 hour at room temperature, with subsequent washing in TBST. β-Actin (ab8227, 1:5,000; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) was used as an internal control for protein loading. The membranes were visualized using the ChemiDoc MP System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) with enhanced chemiluminescence substrate (Millipore). Densitometric quantification of the bands was performed using Image J software (version 1.29x, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). First, the ratio of the optical density of the protein to that of β-actin was determined. These values in the experimental groups were then normalized to the values in the control group to obtain relative expression levels.

Statistical analysis

SPSS 17.0 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analyses. All data were expressed as the mean ± SD. Comparisons among multiple groups were performed using one-way analysis of variance, followed by Tukey's post hoc test. A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Histopathological changes in the rat model of DAI

Hematoxylin-eosin-stained sections showed the presence of vacuoles around neurons in the cerebral cortex of rats with DAI. Pyknosis was observed in the DAI 6 h, 1 d, 3 d and 7 d groups (Figure ). Swollen neurons and distorted axons were visible in the cerebral cortex of the DAI 6 h and 1 d groups (Figure ). Pyknotic, swollen and tangled neurons were clearly visible in the DAI 1 d group (). In contrast, in the cortex of rats in the control group, these features were absent (). Photomicrographs of the cerebral cortex in the control and DAI groups (hematoxylin-eosin staining). (A) Control group: no notable abnormality. (B) DAI 6 h group: vacuoles around neurons and pyknosis begin to appear. (C) DAI 1 d group: vacuoles are more obvious, and a large number of pyknotic and swollen neurons and distorted axons are observable. (D) DAI 3 d group: the number of damaged cells appears to be decreased, but pyknotic and swollen neurons and distorted axons are still visible. (E) DAI 7 d group: pyknosis is still observed, but the tissue appears to be in a recovery stage, scale bars: 100 μm. Figures in the top right corner are magnified images of representative pathological changes, scale bars: 20 μm. DAI: Diffuse axonal injury; d: day(s); h: hours.

Dynamic changes in expression of β-APP and in p-tau (S404) and total tau levels

Compared with the control group, the expression of β-APP was increased 1.6-fold, 2.1-fold, 2.4-fold and 1.9-fold in the DAI 6 h, 1 d, 3 d and 7 d groups, respectively (P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, the levels of p-tau (S404) were increased 6.2-fold, 7.6-fold, 16.7-fold and 7.4-fold, respectively. Levels of total tau were decreased to 0.5, 0.6, 0.7 and 0.9× the levels in the control group in the DAI 6 h, 1 d, 3 d and 7 d groups, respectively (all P < 0.05) (). Dynamic expression of β-APP, p-tau (S404) and total tau protein in the cortex of control and DAI groups assessed by western blot assay. Compared with the control group, the levels of β-APP and p-tau (S404) increased at 6 h, peaked at 3 d, and gradually decreased at 7 d after DAI. Total tau declined to the lowest level at 6 h, and then gradually increased after DAI. Histograms show the relative fold changes in each group relative to the control group (mean ± SD, n = 6, one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's post hoc test). *P < 0.05, vs. control group. DAI: Diffuse axonal injury; β-APP: amyloid-beta precursor protein; p-tau (S404): hyperphosphorylated tau at Ser404; d: day(s); h: hours.

Effects of RSG on β-APP, p-tau (S404), total tau and caveolin-1 levels 3 days after DAI

Western blot assay

Compared with the control group, β-APP expression was increased 1.6-fold, 1.8-fold and 1.3-fold in the DAI 3 d, DAI 3 d + saline and DAI 3 d + RSG groups, respectively (all P < 0.05). p-tau (S404) levels were increased 15.1-fold, 16.2-fold and 7.9-fold in the DAI 3 d, DAI 3 d + saline and DAI 3 d + RSG groups, respectively (all P < 0.05). Caveolin-1 expression was increased 1.1-fold, 1.2-fold and 1.6-fold in the DAI 3 d, DAI 3 d + saline and DAI 3 d + RSG groups, respectively (all P < 0.05). Total tau levels were decreased to 0.4, 0.4 and 0.8× the level in the control group in the DAI 3 d, DAI 3 d + saline and DAI 3 d + RSG groups, respectively (all P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the DAI 3 d and DAI 3 d + saline groups (all P > 0.05). Compared with the DAI 3 d or DAI 3 d + saline groups, the DAI 3 d + RSG group showed increased caveolin-1 expression and decreased p-tau (S404) and β-APP levels (P < 0.05) (). Treatment with RSG blocks the increases in β-APP and p-tau (S404) levels and up-regulates the expression of total tau and caveolin-1 in the cortex 3 d after DAI. Compared with the control group, the levels of β-APP, p-tau (S404) and caveolin-1 were increased, while total tau was significantly decreased in the DAI 3 d and DAI 3 d + saline groups. There was no significant difference between the DAI 3 d and DAI 3 d + saline groups. Compared with the DAI 3 d and DAI 3 d + saline groups, the DAI 3 d + RSG group showed increased caveolin-1 and total tau expression and decreased p-tau (S404) and β-APP levels. Histograms show the relative fold changes in each group relative to the control group (mean ± SD, n = 6, one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's post hoc test). *P < 0.05, vs. the control group; #P < 0.05, vs. the DAI 3 d and DAI 3 d + saline group. DAI: Diffuse axonal injury; RSG: rosiglitazone; β-APP: amyloid beta-precursor protein; p-tau (S404): hyperphosphorylated tau at Ser404; d: days.

Immunohistochemical staining

p-tau (S404) levels were significantly higher in the DAI 3 d and DAI 3 d + saline groups, with scores of 8.5 and 7.9, respectively, compared with the control group, which had a score of 2.6 (P < 0.05). The DAI 3 d + RSG group showed decreased p-tau (S404) staining with a score of 4.3 (P < 0.05, vs. DAI 3 d or DAI 3 d + saline groups). Similarly, β-APP expression was significantly higher in the DAI 3 d and DAI 3 d + saline groups, with scores of 7.6 and 8.2, respectively, compared with the control group, which had a score of 1.9 (P < 0.05). β-APP expression in the DAI 3 d + RSG group was decreased, with a score of 3.6 (P < 0.05, vs. DAI 3 d or DAI 3 d + saline groups). Caveolin-1 was mainly expressed in the cell membrane in the cerebral cortex. Caveolin-1 expression was significantly higher in the DAI 3 d and DAI 3 d + saline groups, with scores of 3.1 and 3.3, respectively, compared with the control group, which had a score of 1.5 (P < 0.05). RSG treatment increased caveolin-1 expression (score of 6.0;P < 0.05, vs. DAI 3 d or DAI 3 d + saline groups) (). RSG administration inhibits the increases in β-APP and p-tau (S404) and up-regulates caveolin-1 expression in the rat cortex 3 d after DAI (immunohistochemical staining). Compared with the control group, strong staining for β-APP and p-tau (S404), and relatively mild staining for caveolin-1 are visible in the cortex of the DAI 3 d and DAI 3 d + saline groups (*P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the DAI 3 d and DAI 3 d + saline groups. Compared with the DAI 3 d and DAI 3 d + saline groups, caveolin-1 expression was higher, but p-tau (S404) and β-APP expression was lower in the DAI 3 d + RSG group (#P < 0.05). The histogram shows the immunohistochemical score for each group, determined by multiplying the staining quantity and intensity levels (mean ± SD, n = 6, one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's post hoc test). A higher immunohistochemical score indicates stronger staining intensity and/or a greater number of positive cells. Scale bars: 100 μm. DAI: Diffuse axonal injury; RSG: rosiglitazone; IHC: immunohistochemistry; β-APP: amyloid beta-precursor protein; p-tau (S404): hyperphosphorylated tau at Ser404; d: days.

Discussion

Hyperphosphorylation and loss of tau have been implicated in the pathogenesis of DAI. β-APP accumulates rapidly and massively in axonal bulbs when the axon is damaged (Li et al., 2010). Therefore, drugs that simultaneously attenuate tau hyperphosphorylation, lower β-APP levels and inhibit the decrease in total tau may have therapeutic potential in the treatment of DAI in patients. In this study, we investigated the pathology and dynamic changes in the levels of β-APP, p-tau (S404) and total tau at different time points in a rat model of DAI. The effects of RSG on β-APP, p-tau (S404), total tau and caveolin-1 at 3 d after DAI were also assessed. The major findings of our study are as follows: (1) the levels of p-tau (S404) and β-APP peaked 3 d post DAI, while total tau levels decreased after DAI; (2) RSG treatment attenuated DAI-induced increases in β-APP and p-tau (S404) levels; (3) RSG prevented the decrease in total tau levels 3 d after DAI; (4) RSG treatment increased caveolin-1 expression. β-APP can be detected at the site of axonal injury. Mu et al. (2015) reported that following impact acceleration traumatic brain injury, β-APP is detectable in injured axons as early as 2 to 6 h after trauma and continues to accumulate 1–3 d post injury. Hyperphosphorylation of tau results in microtubule destabilization. Shultz et al. (2015) showed that in the rat DAI model created by lateral fluid percussion, there is increased phosphorylation of tau (p-tau (S198/S262)) in the cortex 24 h and 3 d post injury, although total tau levels did not significantly differ from the control group (Shultz et al., 2015). In the present study, β-APP expression and hyperphosphorylation of tau, induced by rapid lateral head rotation, had similar temporal trends, with significantly increased expression from 6 h to 3 d, in accordance with the previous study. However, p-tau (S404) was detected soon after DAI, while total tau was significantly decreased at 6 h, 1 d and 3 d post DAI in this study. Moreover, the histopathological study revealed the presence of axonal injury 6 h post injury, which greatly worsened 1 to 3 h post injury. These findings suggest that secondary processes contribute to further axonal damage and degeneration after the initial injury. RSG is a commonly prescribed insulin-sensitizing drug that is a selective agonist of PPAR-γ. It has been shown that RSG provides neuroprotection in animal models of focal ischemia, spinal cord injury, and Alzheimer's disease (Madeira et al., 2015). RSG also confers neuroprotection after traumatic brain injury via anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic, anti-oxidative mechanisms (Yi et al., 2008). Researches on the effects of RSG on tau hyperphosphorylation have mainly focused on Alzheimer's disease. RSG alleviates spatial learning deficits in APP/PS1/tau transgenic mice by reducing tau hyperphosphorylation in the brain (Mazanetz and Fischer, 2007; Escribano et al., 2010; Yoon et al., 2010; Tokutake et al., 2012; Song et al., 2014; Yu et al., 2014). In addition, there are a few reports on the effects of RSG on β-APP and total tau. The present study is the first to demonstrate that RSG treatment attenuates the dramatic rise in β-APP expression and p-tau (S404) levels after DAI. Furthermore, RSG inhibited the decrease in total tau following DAI, thereby producing a neuroprotective effect. However, the mechanisms underlying these effects of RSG after DAI are still unknown. In this study, the down-regulation of β-APP and p-tau (S404) induced by RSG was accompanied by increased expression of caveolin-1, a scaffolding protein in caveolae that physically interacts with membrane-associated signaling molecules. RSG dose and time-dependently increases caveolin-1 mRNA and protein levels by activating PPAR-γ and/or epidermal growth factor receptor (Burgermeister et al., 2003; Llaverias et al., 2004; Seda et al., 2008; Tencer et al., 2008). Up-regulation of caveolin-1 by RSG may mediate some of the phenotypic changes in cancer cells, suppress tumor growth and inhibit proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells after subarachnoid hemorrhage (Burgermeister et al., 2003; Chintharlapalli et al., 2004; Cheng et al., 2014). When caveolin-1 is overexpressed, β-APP and β-secretase localize to caveolae, resulting in decreased β-amyloid production, suggesting a protective role of caveolin-1 (Hattori et al., 2006). Hyperphosphorylation of tau is observed in hippocampal homogenates from caveolin-1 knockout mice. Knockout of caveolin-1 accelerates neurodegeneration and aging (Head et al., 2010). However, caveolin-1 deletion reduces early brain injury after experimental intracerebral hemorrhage (Chang et al., 2011). Our current findings suggest that the up-regulation of caveolin-1 produced by RSG is neuroprotective, and may lower β-APP and p-tau (S404) levels and inhibit the reduction in total tau. Further studies are required to clarify the underlying mechanisms of action. There are multiple phosphorylation sites on tau, including Ser404, Ser198 and Thr205. The phosphorylation status of these sites differ in different pathological conditions. In this study, only one site (Ser404) was assessed. Additional phosphorylation sites should be examined, and the effects of RSG on neurological deficits should also be examined in future studies. Furthermore, additional studies are needed to clarify how the RSG-induced up-regulation of caveolin-1 provides neuroprotection. Interestingly, the inhibition of PPAR-γ results in a decrease in proliferation and loss of the undifferentiated phenotype in neural precursor cells (Bernal et al., 2015). Therefore, RSG treatment may also promote nerve regeneration. In summary, RSG exerts a significant neuroprotective effect by suppressing excessive expression of β-APP, by lowering p-tau (S404) levels, and by preventing the decrease in total tau in a rat model of DAI. Caveolin-1 may be involved in the neuroprotection provided by RSG. Our novel findings suggest that RSG may have therapeutic potential for the treatment of DAI. Further studies are required to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying the neuroprotective effects of RSG.
  31 in total

1.  Insulin sensitizers improve learning and attenuate tau hyperphosphorylation and neuroinflammation in 3xTg-AD mice.

Authors:  Yang Yu; Xiaojing Li; Julie Blanchard; Yi Li; Khalid Iqbal; Fei Liu; Cheng-Xin Gong
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.575

2.  BACE1 interacts with lipid raft proteins.

Authors:  Chinatsu Hattori; Masashi Asai; Hayato Onishi; Noboru Sasagawa; Yasuhiro Hashimoto; Takaomi C Saido; Kei Maruyama; Shigehiko Mizutani; Shoichi Ishiura
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.164

Review 3.  Targeting PPAR isoforms following CNS injury.

Authors:  Heather M Yonutas; Patrick G Sullivan
Journal:  Curr Drug Targets       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.465

4.  Rosiglitazone reduces tau phosphorylation via JNK inhibition in the hippocampus of rats with type 2 diabetes and tau transfected SH-SY5Y cells.

Authors:  Seung-Yong Yoon; Jeong-Su Park; Jung-Eun Choi; Jin-Myung Choi; Woo-Je Lee; Seong-Who Kim; Dong-Hou Kim
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 5.996

5.  Calcium signaling is implicated in the diffuse axonal injury of brain stem.

Authors:  Jiao Mu; Yucheng Song; Ji Zhang; Wei Lin; Hongmei Dong
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-05-01

6.  Rosiglitazone upregulates caveolin-1 expression in THP-1 cells through a PPAR-dependent mechanism.

Authors:  Gemma Llaverias; Manuel Vázquez-Carrera; Rosa M Sánchez; Véronique Noé; Carlos J Ciudad; Juan C Laguna; Marta Alegret
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2004-08-16       Impact factor: 5.922

7.  Rosiglitazone induces caveolin-1 by PPARgamma-dependent and PPRE-independent mechanisms: the role of EGF receptor signaling and its effect on cancer cell drug resistance.

Authors:  Lilach Tencer; Elke Burgermeister; Matthias P Ebert; Mordechai Liscovitch
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.480

8.  Pharmacogenomics of metabolic effects of rosiglitazone.

Authors:  Ondrej Seda; Lucie Sedová; Olena Oliyarnyk; Ludmila Kazdová; Drahomíra Krenová; Gilles Corbeil; Pavel Hamet; Johanne Tremblay; Vladimír Kren
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.533

9.  Loss of caveolin-1 accelerates neurodegeneration and aging.

Authors:  Brian P Head; Jason N Peart; Mathivadhani Panneerselvam; Takaakira Yokoyama; Matthew L Pearn; Ingrid R Niesman; Jacqueline A Bonds; Jan M Schilling; Atsushi Miyanohara; John Headrick; Sameh S Ali; David M Roth; Piyush M Patel; Hemal H Patel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  PPARβ/δ and PPARγ maintain undifferentiated phenotypes of mouse adult neural precursor cells from the subventricular zone.

Authors:  Carolina Bernal; Claudia Araya; Verónica Palma; Miguel Bronfman
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 5.505

View more
  6 in total

1.  Hyperglycemia Aggravates Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption Following Diffuse Axonal Injury by Increasing the Levels of Inflammatory Mediators through the PPARγ/Caveolin-1/TLR4 Pathway.

Authors:  Xing Wei; Yaqing Zhou; Jinning Song; Junjie Zhao; Tingqin Huang; Ming Zhang; Yonglin Zhao
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 4.657

2.  Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ Agonist Rosiglitazone Protects Blood-Brain Barrier Integrity Following Diffuse Axonal Injury by Decreasing the Levels of Inflammatory Mediators Through a Caveolin-1-Dependent Pathway.

Authors:  Yonglin Zhao; Xing Wei; Jinning Song; Ming Zhang; Tingqin Huang; Jie Qin
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.092

3.  MiR-539-5p Decreases amyloid β-protein production, hyperphosphorylation of Tau and Memory Impairment by Regulating PI3K/Akt/GSK-3β Pathways in APP/PS1 Double Transgenic Mice.

Authors:  Yushu Jiang; Yuan Zhang; Li Su
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.911

4.  Curcumin mitigates axonal injury and neuronal cell apoptosis through the PERK/Nrf2 signaling pathway following diffuse axonal injury.

Authors:  Tingqin Huang; Junjie Zhao; Dan Guo; Honggang Pang; Yonglin Zhao; Jinning Song
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  Synapsin-caveolin-1 gene therapy preserves neuronal and synaptic morphology and prevents neurodegeneration in a mouse model of AD.

Authors:  Shanshan Wang; Joseph S Leem; Sonia Podvin; Vivian Hook; Natalia Kleschevnikov; Paul Savchenko; Mehul Dhanani; Kimberly Zhou; Isabella C Kelly; Tong Zhang; Atsushi Miyanohara; Phuong Nguyen; Alexander Kleschevnikov; Steve L Wagner; John Q Trojanowski; David M Roth; Hemal H Patel; Piyush M Patel; Brian P Head
Journal:  Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 6.698

Review 6.  Caveolin-1 and MLRs: A potential target for neuronal growth and neuroplasticity after ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Wei Zhong; Qianyi Huang; Liuwang Zeng; Zhiping Hu; Xiangqi Tang
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 3.738

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.