Jing Li1,2, Tengda Xu1,2, Beverly M Yashar3. 1. Department of Health Management, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China. 2. Center for Translational Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China. 3. Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to explore the relationship between physicians' knowledge and utilization of genetic testing and to explore genetics educational needs in China. METHODS: An anonymous survey about experience, attitudes, and knowledge of genetic testing was conducted among physicians affiliated with Peking Union Medical College Hospital during their annual health evaluation. A personal genetics knowledge score was developed and predictors of personal genetics knowledge score were evaluated. RESULTS: Sixty-four physicians (33% male) completed the survey. Fifty-eight percent of them had used genetic testing in their clinical practice. Using a 4-point scale, mean knowledge scores of six common genetic testing techniques ranged from 1.7 ± 0.9 to 2.4 ± 1.0, and the average personal genetics knowledge score was 2.1 ± 0.8. In regression analysis, significant predictors of higher personal genetics knowledge score were ordering of genetic testing, utilization of pedigrees, higher medical degree, and recent genetics training (P < 0.05). Sixty-six percent of physicians indicated a desire for specialized genetic services, and 84% reported a desire for additional genetics education. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a sizable gap between Chinese physicians' knowledge and utilization of genetic testing. Participants had high self-perceived genetics educational needs. Development of genetics educational platforms is both warranted and desired in China.Genet Med 17 9, 757-760.
PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to explore the relationship between physicians' knowledge and utilization of genetic testing and to explore genetics educational needs in China. METHODS: An anonymous survey about experience, attitudes, and knowledge of genetic testing was conducted among physicians affiliated with Peking Union Medical College Hospital during their annual health evaluation. A personal genetics knowledge score was developed and predictors of personal genetics knowledge score were evaluated. RESULTS: Sixty-four physicians (33% male) completed the survey. Fifty-eight percent of them had used genetic testing in their clinical practice. Using a 4-point scale, mean knowledge scores of six common genetic testing techniques ranged from 1.7 ± 0.9 to 2.4 ± 1.0, and the average personal genetics knowledge score was 2.1 ± 0.8. In regression analysis, significant predictors of higher personal genetics knowledge score were ordering of genetic testing, utilization of pedigrees, higher medical degree, and recent genetics training (P < 0.05). Sixty-six percent of physicians indicated a desire for specialized genetic services, and 84% reported a desire for additional genetics education. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a sizable gap between Chinese physicians' knowledge and utilization of genetic testing. Participants had high self-perceived genetics educational needs. Development of genetics educational platforms is both warranted and desired in China.Genet Med 17 9, 757-760.
Authors: Irmgard Nippert; Hilary J Harris; Claire Julian-Reynier; Ulf Kristoffersson; Leo P Ten Kate; Elizabeth Anionwu; Caroline Benjamin; Kirsty Challen; Jörg Schmidtke; R Peter Nippert; Rodney Harris Journal: J Community Genet Date: 2010-12-04
Authors: Diana S Catz; Nancy S Green; Jonathan N Tobin; Michele A Lloyd-Puryear; Penny Kyler; Ann Umemoto; Jennifer Cernoch; Roxane Brown; Fredericka Wolman Journal: Community Genet Date: 2005
Authors: Karen H Lu; Marie E Wood; Molly Daniels; Cathy Burke; James Ford; Noah D Kauff; Wendy Kohlmann; Noralane M Lindor; Therese M Mulvey; Linda Robinson; Wendy S Rubinstein; Elena M Stoffel; Carrie Snyder; Sapna Syngal; Janette K Merrill; Dana Swartzberg Wollins; Kevin S Hughes Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-02-03 Impact factor: 44.544