Literature DB >> 25502979

A cruciate suture technique for rotator cuff repair.

Jonathon Caldow1, Martin Richardson, Subash Balakrishnan, Tony Sobol, Peter V S Lee, David C Ackland.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Re-establishment of the native footprint during rotator cuff repair is important for maximizing healing potential and fixation strength. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the contact area, contact pressure, stiffness and tensile strength of a new single-row cruciate suture repair and to compare these results to those of the Mason-Allen, double-row and transosseous repairs.
METHODS: Infraspinatus tendons from fifty-six lamb shoulders were harvested and randomly assigned to cruciate suture, Mason-Allen, double-row and transosseous repair groups. Repairs were performed over pressure-sensitive film and footprint contact area and pressure measured. Repaired tendon specimens were also loaded in uniaxial tension, and ultimate tensile strength and stiffness measured.
RESULTS: The cruciate suture repair established significantly greater footprint contact area compared to the Mason-Allen repair (mean difference = 101 mm(2), p = 0.003). The ultimate tensile strength and stiffness of the double-row repair was significantly higher than that of all other repair groups (p < 0.05). The average footprint contact pressure of the cruciate suture repair (0.78 MPa) was similar to that of the Mason-Allen (0.74 MPa) and double-row repairs (0.79 MPa). The ultimate tensile strength of the cruciate suture repair was significantly greater than that of the transosseous repair (mean difference 62.4 N, p = 0.002).
CONCLUSION: The cruciate suture repair may improve strength and healing at the repaired tendon rotator cuff insertion relative to other single-row repair techniques. It may represent a faster, easier and more cost-effective alternative to double-row repairs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25502979     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3474-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  32 in total

1.  A modified Mason-Allen technique for rotator cuff repair using suture anchors.

Authors:  Markus Thomas Scheibel; Peter Habermeyer
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: re-establishing the footprint of the rotator cuff.

Authors:  Ian K Y Lo; Stephen S Burkhart
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  The outcome and repair integrity of completely arthroscopically repaired large and massive rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Leesa M Galatz; Craig M Ball; Sharlene A Teefey; William D Middleton; Ken Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Tendon-grasping strength of various suture configurations for rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Onur Hapa; F Alan Barber; Emin Sünbüloğlu; Yavuz Kocabey; Nazlı Sarkalkan; Gökhan Baysal
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row suture anchor rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Augustus D Mazzocca; Peter J Millett; Carlos A Guanche; Stephen A Santangelo; Robert A Arciero
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-10-06       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: double-row compared with single-row fixation.

Authors:  C Benjamin Ma; Lyn Comerford; Joseph Wilson; Christian M Puttlitz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 7.  Clinical evidence shows no difference between single- and double-row repair for rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Daniel J Reardon; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Full-thickness rotator cuff tears. A biomechanical comparison of suture versus bone anchor techniques.

Authors:  S C Reed; N Glossop; D J Ogilvie-Harris
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Functional and anatomical results after rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  D F Gazielly; P Gleyze; C Montagnon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing arthroscopic single- and double-row rotator cuff repair: magnetic resonance imaging and early clinical evaluation.

Authors:  Robert T Burks; Julia Crim; Nick Brown; Barbara Fink; Patrick E Greis
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 6.202

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.