Literature DB >> 25502814

Anthropometric measures in cardiovascular disease prediction: comparison of laboratory-based versus non-laboratory-based model.

Klodian Dhana1, M Arfan Ikram2, Albert Hofman1, Oscar H Franco1, Maryam Kavousi1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Body mass index (BMI) has been used to simplify cardiovascular risk prediction models by substituting total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. In the elderly, the ability of BMI as a predictor of cardiovascular disease (CVD) declines. We aimed to find the most predictive anthropometric measure for CVD risk to construct a non-laboratory-based model and to compare it with the model including laboratory measurements.
METHODS: The study included 2675 women and 1902 men aged 55-79 years from the prospective population-based Rotterdam Study. We used Cox proportional hazard regression analysis to evaluate the association of BMI, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and a body shape index (ABSI) with CVD, including coronary heart disease and stroke. The performance of the laboratory-based and non-laboratory-based models was evaluated by studying the discrimination, calibration, correlation and risk agreement.
RESULTS: Among men, ABSI was the most informative measure associated with CVD, therefore ABSI was used to construct the non-laboratory-based model. Discrimination of the non-laboratory-based model was not different than laboratory-based model (c-statistic: 0.680-vs-0.683, p=0.71); both models were well calibrated (15.3% observed CVD risk vs 16.9% and 17.0% predicted CVD risks by the non-laboratory-based and laboratory-based models, respectively) and Spearman rank correlation and the agreement between non-laboratory-based and laboratory-based models were 0.89 and 91.7%, respectively. Among women, none of the anthropometric measures were independently associated with CVD.
CONCLUSIONS: Among middle-aged and elderly where the ability of BMI to predict CVD declines, the non-laboratory-based model, based on ABSI, could predict CVD risk as accurately as the laboratory-based model among men. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25502814     DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  24 in total

1.  The Rotterdam Study: 2016 objectives and design update.

Authors:  Albert Hofman; Guy G O Brusselle; Sarwa Darwish Murad; Cornelia M van Duijn; Oscar H Franco; André Goedegebure; M Arfan Ikram; Caroline C W Klaver; Tamar E C Nijsten; Robin P Peeters; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Henning W Tiemeier; André G Uitterlinden; Meike W Vernooij
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  The Rotterdam Study: 2018 update on objectives, design and main results.

Authors:  M Arfan Ikram; Guy G O Brusselle; Sarwa Darwish Murad; Cornelia M van Duijn; Oscar H Franco; André Goedegebure; Caroline C W Klaver; Tamar E C Nijsten; Robin P Peeters; Bruno H Stricker; Henning Tiemeier; André G Uitterlinden; Meike W Vernooij; Albert Hofman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Metabolically Healthy Obesity and the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in the Elderly Population.

Authors:  Klodian Dhana; Chantal M Koolhaas; Elisabeth F C van Rossum; M Arfan Ikram; Albert Hofman; Maryam Kavousi; Oscar H Franco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  An Anthropometric Risk Index Based on Combining Height, Weight, Waist, and Hip Measurements.

Authors:  Nir Y Krakauer; Jesse C Krakauer
Journal:  J Obes       Date:  2016-10-18

5.  Association of Body Shape Index (ABSI) with cardio-metabolic risk factors: A cross-sectional study of 6081 Caucasian adults.

Authors:  Simona Bertoli; Alessandro Leone; Nir Y Krakauer; Giorgio Bedogni; Angelo Vanzulli; Valentino Ippocrates Redaelli; Ramona De Amicis; Laila Vignati; Jesse C Krakauer; Alberto Battezzati
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Body shape index: Sex-specific differences in predictive power for all-cause mortality in the Japanese population.

Authors:  Yuji Sato; Shouichi Fujimoto; Tsuneo Konta; Kunitoshi Iseki; Toshiki Moriyama; Kunihiro Yamagata; Kazuhiko Tsuruya; Ichiei Narita; Masahide Kondo; Masato Kasahara; Yugo Shibagaki; Koichi Asahi; Tsuyoshi Watanabe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Physical Activity Level Improves the Predictive Accuracy of Cardiovascular Disease Risk Score: The ATTICA Study (2002-2012).

Authors:  Ekavi N Georgousopoulou; Demosthenes B Panagiotakos; Dimitrios Bougatsas; Michael Chatzigeorgiou; Stavros A Kavouras; Christina Chrysohoou; Ioannis Skoumas; Dimitrios Tousoulis; Christodoulos Stefanadis; Christos Pitsavos
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2016-03-09

8.  Trajectories of body mass index before the diagnosis of cardiovascular disease: a latent class trajectory analysis.

Authors:  Klodian Dhana; Joost van Rosmalen; Dorte Vistisen; M Arfan Ikram; Albert Hofman; Oscar H Franco; Maryam Kavousi
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 8.082

9.  Combining Body Mass and Shape Indices in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Jesse C Krakauer; Nir Y Krakauer
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2016-02-29

10.  Optimal Cutoff Points for Anthropometric Variables to Predict Insulin Resistance in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

Authors:  Hossein Hatami; Seyed Ali Montazeri; Nazanin Hashemi; Fahimeh Ramezani Tehrani
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2017-07-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.