Literature DB >> 25502470

Optically transparent polymer devices for in situ assessment of cell electroporation.

Amit Kumar Majhi1, Greeshma Thrivikraman, Bikramjit Basu, V Venkataraman.   

Abstract

In order to study cell electroporation in situ, polymer devices have been fabricated from poly-dimethyl siloxane with transparent indium tin oxide parallel plate electrodes in horizontal geometry. This geometry with cells located on a single focal plane at the interface of the bottom electrode allows a longer observation time in both transmitted bright-field and reflected fluorescence microscopy modes. Using propidium iodide (PI) as a marker dye, the number of electroporated cells in a typical culture volume of 10-100 μl was quantified in situ as a function of applied voltage from 10 to 90 V in a series of ~2-ms pulses across 0.5-mm electrode spacing. The electric field at the interface and device current was calculated using a model that takes into account bulk screening of the transient pulse. The voltage dependence of the number of electroporated cells could be explained using a stochastic model for the electroporation kinetics, and the free energy for pore formation was found to be 45.6 ± 0.5 kT at room temperature. With this device, the optimum electroporation conditions can be quickly determined by monitoring the uptake of PI marker dye in situ under the application of millisecond voltage pulses. The electroporation efficiency was also quantified using an ex situ fluorescence-assisted cell sorter, and the morphology of cultured cells was evaluated after the pulsing experiment. Importantly, the efficacy of the developed device was tested independently using two cell lines (C2C12 mouse myoblast cells and yeast cells) as well as in three different electroporation buffers (phosphate buffer saline, electroporation buffer and 10% glycerol).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25502470     DOI: 10.1007/s00249-014-1001-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Biophys J        ISSN: 0175-7571            Impact factor:   1.733


  30 in total

1.  Electropermeabilization of dense cell suspensions.

Authors:  Gorazd Pucihar; Tadej Kotnik; Justin Teissié; Damijan Miklavcic
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 1.733

2.  Changes of the solution pH due to exposure by high-voltage electric pulses.

Authors:  Gintautas Saulis; Remigijus Lape; Rita Praneviciūte; Donatas Mickevicius
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.373

3.  Cellular membrane potentials induced by alternating fields.

Authors:  C Grosse; H P Schwan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  Electroporation of cell membranes.

Authors:  T Y Tsong
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Reversible electrical breakdown of lipid bilayers: formation and evolution of pores.

Authors:  R W Glaser; S L Leikin; L V Chernomordik; V F Pastushenko; A I Sokirko
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1988-05-24

Review 6.  Electroporation-based technologies for medicine: principles, applications, and challenges.

Authors:  Martin L Yarmush; Alexander Golberg; Gregor Serša; Tadej Kotnik; Damijan Miklavčič
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 9.590

7.  Minimum energy path to membrane pore formation and rupture.

Authors:  Christina L Ting; Daniel Appelö; Zhen-Gang Wang
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 9.161

8.  Gene transfer and protein dynamics in stem cells using single cell electroporation in a microfluidic device.

Authors:  A Valero; J N Post; J W van Nieuwkasteele; P M Ter Braak; W Kruijer; A van den Berg
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 6.799

9.  Numerical study of the electroporation pulse shape effect on molecular uptake of biological cells.

Authors:  Damijan Miklavcic; Leila Towhidi
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  Electroporation-induced electrosensitization.

Authors:  Olga N Pakhomova; Betsy W Gregory; Vera A Khorokhorina; Angela M Bowman; Shu Xiao; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.