Melanie R Nicol1, Cindi W Emerson, Heather M A Prince, Julie A E Nelson, Yuri Fedoriw, Craig Sykes, Elizabeth J Geller, Kristine B Patterson, Myron S Cohen, Angela D M Kashuba. 1. *Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; †Center for AIDS Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; and ‡Departments of Medicine and §Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC (Melanie R. Nicol is now with the Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN).
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Model systems that rapidly identify tissue drug concentrations protective of HIV infection could streamline the development of chemoprevention strategies. Tissue models are promising, but limited concentration targets exist, and no systematic comparison to cell models or clinical studies has been performed. DESIGN: We explored the efficacy of maraviroc (MVC) and tenofovir (TFV) for HIV prevention by comparing Emax models from TZM-bl cells to vaginal tissue explants and evaluated their predictive capabilities with a dose-challenge clinical study. METHODS: HIV-1JR-CSF was used for viral challenge. Drug efficacy was assessed using a luciferase reporter assay in TZM-bl cells and real-time PCR to quantify spliced RNA in a tissue explant model. Cell and tissue concentrations of MVC, TFV, and the active metabolite tenofovir diphosphate were measured by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry and used to create Emax models of efficacy. Efficacy after a single oral dose of 600 mg MVC and 600 mg tenofovir disoproxil fumarate was predicted from cell and tissue models and confirmed in a clinical study with viral biopsy challenge postdose. RESULTS: TFV was >10-fold and MVC >1000-fold, more potent in TZM-bl cells compared with vaginal explant tissue. In the dose-challenge study, tissues from 3 of 6 women were protected from HIV infection, which was 49% lower than predicted by TZM-bl data and 36% higher than predicted by tissue explant data. CONCLUSIONS: Comparative effective concentration data were generated for TFV and MVC in 3 HIV chemoprophylaxis models. These results provide a framework for future early investigations of antiretroviral efficacy in HIV prevention to optimize dosing strategies in clinical investigations.
OBJECTIVE: Model systems that rapidly identify tissue drug concentrations protective of HIV infection could streamline the development of chemoprevention strategies. Tissue models are promising, but limited concentration targets exist, and no systematic comparison to cell models or clinical studies has been performed. DESIGN: We explored the efficacy of maraviroc (MVC) and tenofovir (TFV) for HIV prevention by comparing Emax models from TZM-bl cells to vaginal tissue explants and evaluated their predictive capabilities with a dose-challenge clinical study. METHODS: HIV-1JR-CSF was used for viral challenge. Drug efficacy was assessed using a luciferase reporter assay in TZM-bl cells and real-time PCR to quantify spliced RNA in a tissue explant model. Cell and tissue concentrations of MVC, TFV, and the active metabolite tenofovir diphosphate were measured by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry and used to create Emax models of efficacy. Efficacy after a single oral dose of 600 mg MVC and 600 mg tenofovir disoproxil fumarate was predicted from cell and tissue models and confirmed in a clinical study with viral biopsy challenge postdose. RESULTS:TFV was >10-fold and MVC >1000-fold, more potent in TZM-bl cells compared with vaginal explant tissue. In the dose-challenge study, tissues from 3 of 6 women were protected from HIV infection, which was 49% lower than predicted by TZM-bl data and 36% higher than predicted by tissue explant data. CONCLUSIONS: Comparative effective concentration data were generated for TFV and MVC in 3 HIV chemoprophylaxis models. These results provide a framework for future early investigations of antiretroviral efficacy in HIV prevention to optimize dosing strategies in clinical investigations.
Authors: Kristine B Patterson; Heather A Prince; Eric Kraft; Amanda J Jenkins; Nicholas J Shaheen; James F Rooney; Myron S Cohen; Angela D M Kashuba Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2011-12-07 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Michael C Thigpen; Poloko M Kebaabetswe; Lynn A Paxton; Dawn K Smith; Charles E Rose; Tebogo M Segolodi; Faith L Henderson; Sonal R Pathak; Fatma A Soud; Kata L Chillag; Rodreck Mutanhaurwa; Lovemore Ian Chirwa; Michael Kasonde; Daniel Abebe; Evans Buliva; Roman J Gvetadze; Sandra Johnson; Thom Sukalac; Vasavi T Thomas; Clyde Hart; Jeffrey A Johnson; C Kevin Malotte; Craig W Hendrix; John T Brooks Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-07-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jared M Baeten; Deborah Donnell; Patrick Ndase; Nelly R Mugo; James D Campbell; Jonathan Wangisi; Jordan W Tappero; Elizabeth A Bukusi; Craig R Cohen; Elly Katabira; Allan Ronald; Elioda Tumwesigye; Edwin Were; Kenneth H Fife; James Kiarie; Carey Farquhar; Grace John-Stewart; Aloysious Kakia; Josephine Odoyo; Akasiima Mucunguzi; Edith Nakku-Joloba; Rogers Twesigye; Kenneth Ngure; Cosmas Apaka; Harrison Tamooh; Fridah Gabona; Andrew Mujugira; Dana Panteleeff; Katherine K Thomas; Lara Kidoguchi; Meighan Krows; Jennifer Revall; Susan Morrison; Harald Haugen; Mira Emmanuel-Ogier; Lisa Ondrejcek; Robert W Coombs; Lisa Frenkel; Craig Hendrix; Namandjé N Bumpus; David Bangsberg; Jessica E Haberer; Wendy S Stevens; Jairam R Lingappa; Connie Celum Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-07-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Peter A Anton; Ross D Cranston; Angela Kashuba; Craig W Hendrix; Namandjé N Bumpus; Nicola Richardson-Harman; Julie Elliott; Laura Janocko; Elena Khanukhova; Robert Dennis; William G Cumberland; Chuan Ju; Alex Carballo-Diéguez; Christine Mauck; Ian McGowan Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2012-10-09 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Jill L Schwartz; Wes Rountree; Angela D M Kashuba; Vivian Brache; Mitchell D Creinin; Alfred Poindexter; Brian P Kearney Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-10-19 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Mackenzie L Cottrell; Kuo H Yang; Heather M A Prince; Craig Sykes; Nicole White; Stephanie Malone; Evan S Dellon; Ryan D Madanick; Nicholas J Shaheen; Michael G Hudgens; Jacob Wulff; Kristine B Patterson; Julie A E Nelson; Angela D M Kashuba Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2016-02-24 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Charlene S Dezzutti; Laura J Else; Sarah E Yandura; Cory Shetler; Julie Russo; David J Back; Ian McGowan Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2016-04-22 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Charlene S Dezzutti; Sarah Yandura; Lin Wang; Bernard Moncla; Elizabeth A Teeple; Brid Devlin; Jeremy Nuttall; Elizabeth R Brown; Lisa C Rohan Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2015-06-16 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: Betsy C Herold; Beatrice A Chen; Robert A Salata; Mark A Marzinke; Clifton W Kelly; Charlene S Dezzutti; Ian McGowan; Beth Galaska; Lisa Levy; Jeanna M Piper; Sharon Hillier; Craig W Hendrix Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2015-10-27 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Rogers Sekabira; Ian McGowan; Krista Yuhas; Rhonda M Brand; Mark A Marzinke; Yukari C Manabe; Ian Frank; Joseph Eron; Raphael J Landovitz; Peter Anton; Ross D Cranston; Peter Anderson; Kenneth H Mayer; K Rivet Amico; Timothy J Wilkin; Wairimu Chege; Adeodata R Kekitiinwa; Marybeth McCauley; Roy M Gulick; Craig W Hendrix Journal: AIDS Date: 2021-08-01 Impact factor: 4.632