Literature DB >> 25501498

Enhancement of MHC-I antigen presentation via architectural control of pH-responsive, endosomolytic polymer nanoparticles.

John T Wilson1, Almar Postma, Salka Keller, Anthony J Convertine, Graeme Moad, Ezio Rizzardo, Laurence Meagher, John Chiefari, Patrick S Stayton.   

Abstract

Protein-based vaccines offer a number of important advantages over organism-based vaccines but generally elicit poor CD8(+) T cell responses. We have previously demonstrated that pH-responsive, endosomolytic polymers can enhance protein antigen delivery to major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) antigen presentation pathways thereby augmenting CD8(+) T cell responses following immunization. Here, we describe a new family of nanocarriers for protein antigen delivery assembled using architecturally distinct pH-responsive polymers. Reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization was used to synthesize linear, hyperbranched, and core-crosslinked copolymers of 2-(N,N-diethylamino)ethyl methacrylate (DEAEMA) and butyl methacrylate (BMA) that were subsequently chain extended with a hydrophilic N,N-dimethylacrylamide (DMA) segment copolymerized with thiol-reactive pyridyl disulfide (PDS) groups. In aqueous solution, polymer chains assembled into 25 nm micellar nanoparticles and enabled efficient and reducible conjugation of a thiolated protein antigen, ovalbumin. Polymers demonstrated pH-dependent membrane-destabilizing activity in an erythrocyte lysis assay, with the hyperbranched and cross-linked polymer architectures exhibiting significantly higher hemolysis at pH ≤ 7.0 than the linear diblock. Antigen delivery with the hyperbranched and cross-linked polymer architecture enhanced in vitro MHC-I antigen presentation relative to free antigen, whereas the linear construct did not have a discernible effect. The hyperbranched system elicited a four- to fivefold increase in MHC-I presentation relative to the cross-linked architecture, demonstrating the superior capacity of the hyperbranched architecture in enhancing MHC-I presentation. This work demonstrates that the architecture of pH-responsive, endosomolytic polymers can have dramatic effects on intracellular antigen delivery, and offers a promising strategy for enhancing CD8(+) T cell responses to protein-based vaccines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25501498      PMCID: PMC4365097          DOI: 10.1208/s12248-014-9697-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  39 in total

1.  Diblock copolymers with tunable pH transitions for gene delivery.

Authors:  Matthew J Manganiello; Connie Cheng; Anthony J Convertine; James D Bryers; Patrick S Stayton
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Encapsulating immunostimulatory CpG oligonucleotides in listeriolysin O-liposomes promotes a Th1-type response and CTL activity.

Authors:  Chasity D Andrews; Myung-Sook Huh; Kathryn Patton; Debbie Higgins; Gary Van Nest; Gary Ott; Kyung-Dall Lee
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 3.  Viral vectors as vaccine platforms: deployment in sight.

Authors:  Christine S Rollier; Arturo Reyes-Sandoval; Matthew G Cottingham; Katie Ewer; Adrian V S Hill
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 7.486

Review 4.  Particulate vaccines: on the quest for optimal delivery and immune response.

Authors:  Marie-Luce De Temmerman; Joanna Rejman; Jo Demeester; Darrell J Irvine; Bruno Gander; Stefaan C De Smedt
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 7.851

Review 5.  Biomaterials for nanoparticle vaccine delivery systems.

Authors:  Preety Sahdev; Lukasz J Ochyl; James J Moon
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Biodegradable particles as vaccine delivery systems: size matters.

Authors:  Vijaya B Joshi; Sean M Geary; Aliasger K Salem
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 4.009

7.  pH-Responsive nanoparticle vaccines for dual-delivery of antigens and immunostimulatory oligonucleotides.

Authors:  John T Wilson; Salka Keller; Matthew J Manganiello; Connie Cheng; Chen-Chang Lee; Chinonso Opara; Anthony Convertine; Patrick S Stayton
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 15.881

8.  pH-Sensitive fusogenic polymer-modified liposomes as a carrier of antigenic proteins for activation of cellular immunity.

Authors:  Eiji Yuba; Chie Kojima; Atsushi Harada; Shinobu Watarai; Kenji Kono
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Development of a nanoparticle-based influenza vaccine using the PRINT technology.

Authors:  Ashley L Galloway; Andrew Murphy; Joseph M DeSimone; Jie Di; Jennifer P Herrmann; Michael E Hunter; Jeffrey P Kindig; Frank J Malinoski; Megan A Rumley; Daria M Stoltz; Thomas S Templeman; Bolyn Hubby
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 5.307

10.  A computationally designed inhibitor of an Epstein-Barr viral Bcl-2 protein induces apoptosis in infected cells.

Authors:  Erik Procko; Geoffrey Y Berguig; Betty W Shen; Yifan Song; Shani Frayo; Anthony J Convertine; Daciana Margineantu; Garrett Booth; Bruno E Correia; Yuanhua Cheng; William R Schief; David M Hockenbery; Oliver W Press; Barry L Stoddard; Patrick S Stayton; David Baker
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  18 in total

1.  Nanoparticles in vaccine delivery.

Authors:  Aliasger K Salem
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Self-Assembly as a Molecular Strategy to Improve Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Eugene Froimchuk; Sean T Carey; Camilla Edwards; Christopher M Jewell
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 22.384

3.  The efficiency of cytosolic drug delivery using pH-responsive endosomolytic polymers does not correlate with activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome.

Authors:  Jessalyn J Baljon; Aamina Dandy; Lihong Wang-Bishop; Mohamed Wehbe; Max E Jacobson; John T Wilson
Journal:  Biomater Sci       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 6.843

4.  Fatty Acid-Mimetic Micelles for Dual Delivery of Antigens and Imidazoquinoline Adjuvants.

Authors:  Sema Sevimli; Frances C Knight; Pavlo Gilchuk; Sebastian Joyce; John T Wilson
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2016-11-09

Review 5.  Recent developments in intracellular protein delivery.

Authors:  Yumiao Zhang; Joachim Justad Røise; Kunwoo Lee; Jie Li; Niren Murthy
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2018-02-24       Impact factor: 9.740

Review 6.  Polymer nanostructures synthesized by controlled living polymerization for tumor-targeted drug delivery.

Authors:  Christine E Wang; Patrick S Stayton; Suzie H Pun; Anthony J Convertine
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 7.  Accessing Intracellular Targets through Nanocarrier-Mediated Cytosolic Protein Delivery.

Authors:  Ritabrita Goswami; Taewon Jeon; Harini Nagaraj; Shumei Zhai; Vincent M Rotello
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 14.819

8.  Poly(propylacrylic acid)-peptide nanoplexes as a platform for enhancing the immunogenicity of neoantigen cancer vaccines.

Authors:  Feng Qiu; Kyle W Becker; Frances C Knight; Jessalyn J Baljon; Sema Sevimli; Daniel Shae; Pavlo Gilchuk; Sebastian Joyce; John T Wilson
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 9.  Is There an Optimal Formulation and Delivery Strategy for Subunit Vaccines?

Authors:  Sharan Bobbala; Sarah Hook
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 4.580

10.  Proton-driven transformable nanovaccine for cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Ningqiang Gong; Yuxuan Zhang; Xucong Teng; Yongchao Wang; Shuaidong Huo; Guangchao Qing; Qiankun Ni; Xianlei Li; Jinjin Wang; Xiaoxia Ye; Tingbin Zhang; Shizhu Chen; Yongji Wang; Jie Yu; Paul C Wang; Yaling Gan; Jinchao Zhang; Michael J Mitchell; Jinghong Li; Xing-Jie Liang
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 40.523

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.