I K Moppett1, M Rowlands2, A Mannings2, C G Moran3, M D Wiles4. 1. Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Division of Clinical Neuroscience , Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK iain.moppett@nottingham.ac.uk. 2. Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Division of Clinical Neuroscience , Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK. 3. Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK. 4. Department of Anaesthetics, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Glossop Road, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hip fracture is a condition with high mortality and morbidity in elderly frail patients. Intraoperative fluid optimization may be associated with benefit in this population. We investigated whether intraoperative fluid management using pulse-contour analysis cardiac monitoring, compared with standard care in patients undergoing spinal anaesthesia, would provide benefits in terms of reduced time until medically fit for discharge and postoperative complications. METHODS: Patients undergoing surgical repair of fractured neck of femur, aged >60 yr, receiving spinal anaesthesia were enrolled in this single-centre, blinded, randomized, parallel group trial. Patients were allocated to either anaesthetist-directed fluid therapy or a pulse-contour-guided fluid optimization strategy using colloid (Gelofusine) boluses to optimize stroke volume. The primary outcome was time until medically fit for discharge. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications, mobility, and mortality. We updated a systematic review to include relevant trials to 2014. RESULTS: We recruited 130 patients. Time until medically fit for discharge was similar in both groups, mean [95% confidence interval (CI)] 12.2 (11.1-13.5) vs 13.1 (11.9-14.5) days (P=0.31), as was total length of stay 14.2 (12.9-15.8) vs 15.3 (13.8-17.2) days (P=0.32). There were no significant differences in complications, function, or mortality. An updated meta-analysis (four studies, 355 patients) found non-significant reduction in early mortality [relative risk 0.66 (0.24-1.79)] and in-hospital complications [relative risk 0.80 (0.61-1.05)]. CONCLUSIONS: Goal-directed fluid therapy during hip fracture repair under spinal anaesthesia does not result in a significant reduction in length of stay or postoperative complications. There is insufficient evidence to either support or discount its routine use. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN88284896.
BACKGROUND: Hip fracture is a condition with high mortality and morbidity in elderly frail patients. Intraoperative fluid optimization may be associated with benefit in this population. We investigated whether intraoperative fluid management using pulse-contour analysis cardiac monitoring, compared with standard care in patients undergoing spinal anaesthesia, would provide benefits in terms of reduced time until medically fit for discharge and postoperative complications. METHODS: Patients undergoing surgical repair of fractured neck of femur, aged >60 yr, receiving spinal anaesthesia were enrolled in this single-centre, blinded, randomized, parallel group trial. Patients were allocated to either anaesthetist-directed fluid therapy or a pulse-contour-guided fluid optimization strategy using colloid (Gelofusine) boluses to optimize stroke volume. The primary outcome was time until medically fit for discharge. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications, mobility, and mortality. We updated a systematic review to include relevant trials to 2014. RESULTS: We recruited 130 patients. Time until medically fit for discharge was similar in both groups, mean [95% confidence interval (CI)] 12.2 (11.1-13.5) vs 13.1 (11.9-14.5) days (P=0.31), as was total length of stay 14.2 (12.9-15.8) vs 15.3 (13.8-17.2) days (P=0.32). There were no significant differences in complications, function, or mortality. An updated meta-analysis (four studies, 355 patients) found non-significant reduction in early mortality [relative risk 0.66 (0.24-1.79)] and in-hospital complications [relative risk 0.80 (0.61-1.05)]. CONCLUSIONS: Goal-directed fluid therapy during hip fracture repair under spinal anaesthesia does not result in a significant reduction in length of stay or postoperative complications. There is insufficient evidence to either support or discount its routine use. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN88284896.
Authors: Michael R Mathis; Samuel A Schechtman; Milo C Engoren; Amy M Shanks; Aleda Thompson; Sachin Kheterpal; Kevin K Tremper Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Iain K Moppett; Paul L Greenhaff; Ben J Ollivere; Theophillus Joachim; Dileep N Lobo; Martin Rowlands Journal: Trials Date: 2014-12-04 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Anna Wrzosek; Joanna Jakowicka-Wordliczek; Renata Zajaczkowska; Wojciech T Serednicki; Milosz Jankowski; Malgorzata M Bala; Mateusz J Swierz; Maciej Polak; Jerzy Wordliczek Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-12-12