Brett Rocos1, Michael R Whitehouse1, Katherine Walsh1, Barnaby C Reeves2, Michael B Kelly1. 1. Avon Orthopaedic Centre, Brunel Building, Southmead Hospital, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol, BS10 5NB, United Kingdom. 2. Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS2 8HW, United Kingdom.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to determine the practicality and estimate the effect of administering pre-operative blood product resuscitation to a consecutive, prospectively recruited cohort of 100 patients admitted to a single centre with a hip fracture with all other treatment unchanged. METHOD: 100 patients aged 65 years or over admitted acutely to our unit with unilateral fractured femoral neck during the study period were included in this study, regardless of cognitive function. Patients were excluded only if there were relevant medical comorbidities or consent was declined. Each patient was resuscitated with a single unit of packed red cells in the immediate perioperative period in addition to standard care. The primary outcome was to establish the feasibility of the study protocol employed in using blood products to resuscitate eligible patients and recording reasons for any failures to include eligible patients. Additional data regarding mortality at 30 days following injury, subsequent blood product use, any transfusion related adverse reactions and total blood product use was measured. RESULTS: We were able to show that it is safe and practicable to deliver blood as an early resuscitative strategy in the frail elderly hip fracture population. The mortality rate of the study cohort was 3%. No adverse reaction was observed in any of the 99 patients given blood as a result of the resuscitation strategy and no morbidity was seen that could be attributed to the effect of giving blood. The total amount of blood received by comparable cohorts in the study period and the two preceding years were similar. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that in the hip fracture population it is both practical and beneficial to move away from reactive transfusion regimens, and instead centre efforts instead on optimal resuscitation at the initial presentation.
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to determine the practicality and estimate the effect of administering pre-operative blood product resuscitation to a consecutive, prospectively recruited cohort of 100 patients admitted to a single centre with a hip fracture with all other treatment unchanged. METHOD: 100 patients aged 65 years or over admitted acutely to our unit with unilateral fractured femoral neck during the study period were included in this study, regardless of cognitive function. Patients were excluded only if there were relevant medical comorbidities or consent was declined. Each patient was resuscitated with a single unit of packed red cells in the immediate perioperative period in addition to standard care. The primary outcome was to establish the feasibility of the study protocol employed in using blood products to resuscitate eligible patients and recording reasons for any failures to include eligible patients. Additional data regarding mortality at 30 days following injury, subsequent blood product use, any transfusion related adverse reactions and total blood product use was measured. RESULTS: We were able to show that it is safe and practicable to deliver blood as an early resuscitative strategy in the frail elderly hip fracture population. The mortality rate of the study cohort was 3%. No adverse reaction was observed in any of the 99 patients given blood as a result of the resuscitation strategy and no morbidity was seen that could be attributed to the effect of giving blood. The total amount of blood received by comparable cohorts in the study period and the two preceding years were similar. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that in the hip fracture population it is both practical and beneficial to move away from reactive transfusion regimens, and instead centre efforts instead on optimal resuscitation at the initial presentation.
Authors: Susan J Brunskill; Sarah L Millette; Ali Shokoohi; E C Pulford; Carolyn Doree; Michael F Murphy; Simon Stanworth Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2015-04-21
Authors: Chika E Uzoigwe; Muralidharan Venkatesan; Robert Smith; Henry G F Burnand; Peter S Young; Caroline L Cheesman; Rory G Middleton Journal: Hip Int Date: 2012 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.135
Authors: Kristin M Salottolo; Charles W Mains; Patrick J Offner; Pamela W Bourg; David Bar-Or Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2013-02-14 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Darren J Costain; Sarah L Whitehouse; Nicole L Pratt; Stephen E Graves; Philip Ryan; Ross W Crawford Journal: Acta Orthop Date: 2011-05-11 Impact factor: 3.717