Ken Herrmann1, Johannes Czernin2, Edward M Wolin3, Pawan Gupta2, Martin Barrio2, Antonio Gutierrez4, Christiaan Schiepers2, Sherly Mosessian2, Michael E Phelps2, Martin S Allen-Auerbach5. 1. Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. 2. Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California. 3. Carcinoid/Neuroendocrine Tumor Program, Samuel Oschin Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; and. 4. Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California. 5. Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California mauerbach@mednet.ucla.edu.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Somatostatin receptor imaging with (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT (DOTATATE) is increasingly used for managing patients with neuroendocrine tumors. The objective of this study was to determine referring physicians' perspectives on the impact of DOTATATE on the management of neuroendocrine tumors. METHODS: A set of 2 questionnaires (pre-PET and post-PET) was sent to the referring physicians of 100 consecutive patients with known or suspected neuroendocrine tumors, who were evaluated with DOTATATE. Questionnaires on 88 patients were returned (response rate, 88%). Referring physicians categorized the DOTATATE findings on the basis of the written PET reports as negative, positive, or equivocal for disease. The likelihood for metastatic disease was scored as low, moderate, or high. The intended management before and changes as a consequence of the PET study were indicated. RESULTS: The indications for PET/CT were initial and subsequent treatment strategy assessments in 14% and 86% of patients, respectively. Referring physicians reported that DOTATATE led to a change in suspicion for metastatic disease in 21 patients (24%; increased and decreased suspicion in 9 [10%] and 12 [14%] patients, respectively). Intended management changes were reported in 53 of 88 (60%) patients. Twenty patients (23%) scheduled to undergo chemotherapy were switched to treatments without chemotherapy, and 6 (7%) were switched from watch-and-wait to other treatment strategies. Conversely, 5 patients (6%) were switched from their initial treatment strategy to watch-and-wait. CONCLUSION: This survey of referring physicians demonstrates a substantial impact of DOTATATE on the intended management of patients with neuroendocrine tumors.
UNLABELLED: Somatostatin receptor imaging with (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT (DOTATATE) is increasingly used for managing patients with neuroendocrine tumors. The objective of this study was to determine referring physicians' perspectives on the impact of DOTATATE on the management of neuroendocrine tumors. METHODS: A set of 2 questionnaires (pre-PET and post-PET) was sent to the referring physicians of 100 consecutive patients with known or suspected neuroendocrine tumors, who were evaluated with DOTATATE. Questionnaires on 88 patients were returned (response rate, 88%). Referring physicians categorized the DOTATATE findings on the basis of the written PET reports as negative, positive, or equivocal for disease. The likelihood for metastatic disease was scored as low, moderate, or high. The intended management before and changes as a consequence of the PET study were indicated. RESULTS: The indications for PET/CT were initial and subsequent treatment strategy assessments in 14% and 86% of patients, respectively. Referring physicians reported that DOTATATE led to a change in suspicion for metastatic disease in 21 patients (24%; increased and decreased suspicion in 9 [10%] and 12 [14%] patients, respectively). Intended management changes were reported in 53 of 88 (60%) patients. Twenty patients (23%) scheduled to undergo chemotherapy were switched to treatments without chemotherapy, and 6 (7%) were switched from watch-and-wait to other treatment strategies. Conversely, 5 patients (6%) were switched from their initial treatment strategy to watch-and-wait. CONCLUSION: This survey of referring physicians demonstrates a substantial impact of DOTATATE on the intended management of patients with neuroendocrine tumors.
Authors: Wouter A P Breeman; Marion de Jong; Erik de Blois; Bert F Bernard; Mark Konijnenberg; Eric P Krenning Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2005-01-18 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: L Fischer; F Bergmann; S Schimmack; U Hinz; S Prieß; B P Müller-Stich; J Werner; T Hackert; M W Büchler Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2014-08-13 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: James C Yao; Manal Hassan; Alexandria Phan; Cecile Dagohoy; Colleen Leary; Jeannette E Mares; Eddie K Abdalla; Jason B Fleming; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Asif Rashid; Douglas B Evans Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-06-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Christina Pfannenberg; Brigitte Gueckel; Lisa Wang; Sergios Gatidis; Susann-Cathrin Olthof; Werner Vach; Matthias Reimold; Christian la Fougere; Konstantin Nikolaou; Peter Martus Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-09-29 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Jeremie Calais; Johannes Czernin; Matthias Eiber; Wolfgang P Fendler; Jeannine Gartmann; Anthony P Heaney; Andrew E Hendifar; Joseph R Pisegna; J Randolph Hecht; Edward M Wolin; Roger Slavik; Pawan Gupta; Andrew Quon; Christiaan Schiepers; Martin S Allen-Auerbach; Ken Herrmann Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2017-05-04 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Wolfgang Peter Fendler; Martin Barrio; Claudio Spick; Martin Allen-Auerbach; Valentina Ambrosini; Matthias Benz; Christina Bluemel; Ravinder Kaur Grewal; Constantin Lapa; Matthias Miederer; Guillaume Nicolas; Tibor Schuster; Johannes Czernin; Ken Herrmann Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2016-08-18 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Manuel Weber; Lukas Kessler; Benedikt Schaarschmidt; Wolfgang Peter Fendler; Harald Lahner; Gerald Antoch; Lale Umutlu; Ken Herrmann; Christoph Rischpler Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2020-04-16 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Stephen A Deppen; Eric Liu; Jeffrey D Blume; Jeffrey Clanton; Chanjuan Shi; Laurie B Jones-Jackson; Vipul Lakhani; Richard P Baum; Jordan Berlin; Gary T Smith; Michael Graham; Martin P Sandler; Dominique Delbeke; Ronald C Walker Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2016-01-14 Impact factor: 10.057