PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging in a large exclusive population of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). METHODS: Data of 141 (mean age 46.2 ± 15.2 years) patients who underwent 178 (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT studies for diagnosis/staging (n = 88) and restaging (n = 90) of pancreatic NET were retrospectively analyzed. PET/CT results were compared to conventional imaging (CIM) when available (n = 86). Histopathology and/or clinical/imaging follow-up (minimum 6 months) were used as reference standard. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT were 85.7%, 79.1%, and 84.8%. The corresponding values were 73%, 50%, and 70.4% for diagnosis/staging groups and 98.6%, 100%, and 98.8% for restaging groups. The accuracy was significantly higher for restaging as compared to diagnosis/staging (P < 0.0001) and in non-insulinoma tumors than insulinomas (P < 0.0001). The SUVmax of primary tumors was significantly higher than metastatic lesions overall (P = 0.001), as well as in diagnosis/staging (P = 0.041) and restaging (P = 0.0003) subgroups. When available, CIM was less specific than (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT (P < 0.001) and showed fewer lesions. CONCLUSIONS: (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT is useful for diagnosis/staging and restaging of patients with pancreatic NET. It demonstrates more lesions compared to CIM and is more specific.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging in a large exclusive population of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). METHODS: Data of 141 (mean age 46.2 ± 15.2 years) patients who underwent 178 (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT studies for diagnosis/staging (n = 88) and restaging (n = 90) of pancreatic NET were retrospectively analyzed. PET/CT results were compared to conventional imaging (CIM) when available (n = 86). Histopathology and/or clinical/imaging follow-up (minimum 6 months) were used as reference standard. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT were 85.7%, 79.1%, and 84.8%. The corresponding values were 73%, 50%, and 70.4% for diagnosis/staging groups and 98.6%, 100%, and 98.8% for restaging groups. The accuracy was significantly higher for restaging as compared to diagnosis/staging (P < 0.0001) and in non-insulinoma tumors than insulinomas (P < 0.0001). The SUVmax of primary tumors was significantly higher than metastatic lesions overall (P = 0.001), as well as in diagnosis/staging (P = 0.041) and restaging (P = 0.0003) subgroups. When available, CIM was less specific than (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT (P < 0.001) and showed fewer lesions. CONCLUSIONS: (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT is useful for diagnosis/staging and restaging of patients with pancreatic NET. It demonstrates more lesions compared to CIM and is more specific.
Authors: James R Howe; Nipun B Merchant; Claudius Conrad; Xavier M Keutgen; Julie Hallet; Jeffrey A Drebin; Rebecca M Minter; Terry C Lairmore; Jennifer F Tseng; Herbert J Zeh; Steven K Libutti; Gagandeep Singh; Jeffrey E Lee; Thomas A Hope; Michelle K Kim; Yusuf Menda; Thorvardur R Halfdanarson; Jennifer A Chan; Rodney F Pommier Journal: Pancreas Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 3.327
Authors: Benjamin Leroy-Freschini; Vincent Amodru; Pietro Addeo; Frédéric Sebag; Michel Vix; Laurent Brunaud; Marc Klein; Thibault Bahougne; Philippe Bachellier; Frédéric Castinetti; Bernard Goichot; Elodie Chevalier; David Taieb; Alessio Imperiale Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-01-07 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Ken Herrmann; Johannes Czernin; Edward M Wolin; Pawan Gupta; Martin Barrio; Antonio Gutierrez; Christiaan Schiepers; Sherly Mosessian; Michael E Phelps; Martin S Allen-Auerbach Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2014-12-11 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: M Falconi; B Eriksson; G Kaltsas; D K Bartsch; J Capdevila; M Caplin; B Kos-Kudla; D Kwekkeboom; G Rindi; G Klöppel; N Reed; R Kianmanesh; R T Jensen Journal: Neuroendocrinology Date: 2016-01-05 Impact factor: 4.914