Literature DB >> 25499651

Does correcting myths about the flu vaccine work? An experimental evaluation of the effects of corrective information.

Brendan Nyhan1, Jason Reifler2.   

Abstract

Seasonal influenza is responsible for thousands of deaths and billions of dollars of medical costs per year in the United States, but influenza vaccination coverage remains substantially below public health targets. One possible obstacle to greater immunization rates is the false belief that it is possible to contract the flu from the flu vaccine. A nationally representative survey experiment was conducted to assess the extent of this flu vaccine misperception. We find that a substantial portion of the public (43%) believes that the flu vaccine can give you the flu. We also evaluate how an intervention designed to address this concern affects belief in the myth, concerns about flu vaccine safety, and future intent to vaccinate. Corrective information adapted from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website significantly reduced belief in the myth that the flu vaccine can give you the flu as well as concerns about its safety. However, the correction also significantly reduced intent to vaccinate among respondents with high levels of concern about vaccine side effects--a response that was not observed among those with low levels of concern. This result, which is consistent with previous research on misperceptions about the MMR vaccine, suggests that correcting myths about vaccines may not be an effective approach to promoting immunization.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Belief; Flu; Influenza; Misperceptions; Myth; Vaccine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25499651     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.11.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  92 in total

1.  Does disease cause vaccination? Disease outbreaks and vaccination response.

Authors:  Emily Oster
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Association of both consistency and strength of self-reported clinician recommendation for HPV vaccination and HPV vaccine uptake among 11- to 12-year-old children.

Authors:  Lila J Finney Rutten; Jennifer L St Sauver; Timothy J Beebe; Patrick M Wilson; Debra J Jacobson; Chun Fan; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Susan T Vadaparampil; Kathy L MacLaughlin; Robert M Jacobson
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.641

3. 

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Does Canada need to improve its immunization rates?

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Associations of trust and healthcare provider advice with HPV vaccine acceptance among African American parents.

Authors:  Linda Y Fu; Gregory D Zimet; Carl A Latkin; Jill G Joseph
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Vaccine hesitancy and influenza beliefs among parents of children requiring a second dose of influenza vaccine in a season: An American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Pediatric Research in Office Settings (PROS) study.

Authors:  Ekaterina Nekrasova; Melissa S Stockwell; Russell Localio; Justine Shults; Chelsea Wynn; Laura P Shone; Lindsay Berrigan; Chelsea Kolff; Miranda Griffith; Andrew Johnson; Alessandra Torres; Douglas J Opel; Alexander G Fiks
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  The impact of provider recommendation on human papillomavirus vaccine and other adolescent vaccines.

Authors:  Alexandria C Caldwell; Christi A Madden; David M Thompson; M Connor Garbe; James R Roberts; Robert M Jacobson; Paul M Darden
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Vaccine acceptance, hesitancy and refusal in Canada: Challenges and potential approaches.

Authors:  E Dubé; J A Bettinger; W A Fisher; M Naus; S M Mahmud; T Hilderman
Journal:  Can Commun Dis Rep       Date:  2016-12-01

9.  Editorial: Are We All Better-than-Average Drivers, and Better-than-Average Kissers? Outwitting the Kruger-Dunning Effect in Clinical Practice and Research.

Authors:  Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Does information about abortion safety affect Texas voters' opinions about restrictive laws? A randomized study.

Authors:  Kari White; Daniel Grossman; Amanda Jean Stevenson; Kristine Hopkins; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.