Literature DB >> 25499539

Communication in a Human biomonitoring study: Focus group work, public engagement and lessons learnt in 17 European countries.

Karen Exley1, Noemi Cano2, Dominique Aerts3, Pierre Biot3, Ludwine Casteleyn4, Marike Kolossa-Gehring5, Gerda Schwedler5, Argelia Castaño6, Jürgen Angerer7, Holger M Koch7, Marta Esteban6, Greet Schoeters8, Elly Den Hond9, Milena Horvat10, Louis Bloemen11, Lisbeth E Knudsen12, Reinhard Joas13, Anke Joas13, Marie-Christine Dewolf14, Els Van de Mieroop15, Andromachi Katsonouri16, Adamos Hadjipanayis17, Milena Cerna18, Andrea Krskova18, Kerstin Becker5, Ulrike Fiddicke5, Margarete Seiwert5, Thit A Mørck12, Peter Rudnai19, Szilvia Kozepesy19, Elizabeth Cullen20, Anne Kellegher20, Arno C Gutleb21, Marc E Fischer22, Danuta Ligocka23, Joanna Kamińska23, Sónia Namorado24, M Fátima Reis24, Ioana-Rodica Lupsa25, Anca E Gurzau25, Katarina Halzlova26, Michal Jajcaj26, Darja Mazej10, Janja Snoj Tratnik10, Olga Huetos6, Ana López6, Marika Berglund27, Kristin Larsson27, Ovnair Sepai28.   

Abstract

A communication strategy was developed by The Consortium to Perform Human Biomonitoring on a European Scale (COPHES), as part of its objectives to develop a framework and protocols to enable the collection of comparable human biomonitoring data throughout Europe. The framework and protocols were tested in the pilot study DEMOCOPHES (Demonstration of a study to Coordinate and Perform Human biomonitoring on a European Scale). The aims of the communication strategy were to raise awareness of human biomonitoring, encourage participation in the study and to communicate the study results and their public health significance. It identified the audiences and key messages, documented the procedure for dissemination of results and was updated as the project progressed. A communication plan listed the tools and materials such as press releases, flyers, recruitment letters and information leaflets required for each audience with a time frame for releasing them. Public insight research was used to evaluate the recruitment material, and the feedback was used to improve the documents. Dissemination of results was coordinated in a step by step approach by the participating countries within DEMOCOPHES, taking into account specific national messages according to the needs of each country. Participants received individual results, unless they refused to be informed, along with guidance on what the results meant. The aggregate results and policy recommendations were then communicated to the general public and stakeholders, followed by dissemination at European level. Several lessons were learnt that may assist other future human biomonitoring studies. Recruitment took longer than anticipated and so social scientists, to help with community engagement, should be part of the research team from the start. As a European study, involving multiple countries, additional considerations were needed for the numerous organisations, different languages, cultures, policies and priorities. Therefore, communication documents should be seen as templates with essential information clearly indicated and the option for each country to tailor the material to reflect these differences. Future studies should consider setting up multidisciplinary networks of medical professionals and communication experts, and holding training workshops to discuss the interpretation of results and risk communication. Publicity and wide dissemination of the results helped to raise awareness of human biomonitoring to the general public, policy makers and other key stakeholders. Effective and timely communication, at all stages of a study, is essential if the potential of human biomonitoring research to improve public health is to be realised.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomonitoring; Communication; Participatory research; Public insight

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25499539     DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2014.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  9 in total

1.  Pilot study testing a European human biomonitoring framework for biomarkers of chemical exposure in children and their mothers: experiences in the UK.

Authors:  Karen Exley; Dominique Aerts; Pierre Biot; Ludwine Casteleyn; Marike Kolossa-Gehring; Gerda Schwedler; Argelia Castaño; Jürgen Angerer; Holger M Koch; Marta Esteban; Birgit K Schindler; Greet Schoeters; Elly Den Hond; Milena Horvat; Louis Bloemen; Lisbeth E Knudsen; Reinhard Joas; Anke Joas; Ovnair Sepai
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Comprehension and perceptions of study participants upon receiving perfluoroalkyl substance exposure biomarker results.

Authors:  Courtney M Giannini; Robert L Herrick; Jeanette M Buckholz; Alex R Daniels; Frank M Biro; Susan M Pinney
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 5.840

3.  Citizens' Perception and Concerns on Chemical Exposures and Human Biomonitoring-Results from a Harmonized Qualitative Study in Seven European Countries.

Authors:  Linda Matisāne; Lisbeth E Knudsen; Joana Lobo Vicente; Maria Uhl; Andromachi Katsonouri; Annick D van den Brand; Tamar Berman; Mirjana Dimovska; Eleni Anastasi; Anthi Thoma; Szilvia Középesy; Dragan Gjorgjev; Mirjana Borota Popovska; Shalenie P den Braver-Sewradj; Tamás Szigeti; Marija Topuzovska Latkovikj; Inese Mārtiņsone; Lāsma Akūlova; Linda Paegle
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Toxicology: a discipline in need of academic anchoring--the point of view of the German Society of Toxicology.

Authors:  U Gundert-Remy; H Barth; A Bürkle; G H Degen; R Landsiedel
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 5.153

5.  Design of a human biomonitoring community-based project in the Northwest Territories Mackenzie Valley, Canada, to investigate the links between nutrition, contaminants and country foods.

Authors:  Mylene Ratelle; Matthew Laird; Shannon Majowicz; Kelly Skinner; Heidi Swanson; Brian Laird
Journal:  Int J Circumpolar Health       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.228

6.  Chemical Exposure: European Citizens' Perspectives, Trust, and Concerns on Human Biomonitoring Initiatives, Information Needs, and Scientific Results.

Authors:  Maria Uhl; Ricardo R Santos; Joana Costa; Osvaldo Santos; Ana Virgolino; David S Evans; Cora Murray; Maurice Mulcahy; Dorothy Ubong; Ovnair Sepai; Joana Lobo Vicente; Michaela Leitner; Silvia Benda-Kahri; Daniela Zanini-Freitag
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  User-Centred Design of a Final Results Report for Participants in Multi-Sensor Personal Air Pollution Exposure Monitoring Campaigns.

Authors:  Johanna Amalia Robinson; Rok Novak; Tjaša Kanduč; Thomas Maggos; Demetra Pardali; Asimina Stamatelopoulou; Dikaia Saraga; Danielle Vienneau; Benjamin Flückiger; Ondřej Mikeš; Céline Degrendele; Ondřej Sáňka; Saul García Dos Santos-Alves; Jaideep Visave; Alberto Gotti; Marco Giovanni Persico; Dimitris Chapizanis; Ioannis Petridis; Spyros Karakitsios; Dimosthenis A Sarigiannis; David Kocman
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 8.  Institutionalizing Open Science in Africa: Limitations and Prospects.

Authors:  Izuchukwu Azuka Okafor; Smart Ikechukwu Mbagwu; Terkuma Chia; Zuwati Hasim; Echezona Ejike Udokanma; Karthik Chandran
Journal:  Front Res Metr Anal       Date:  2022-04-15

9.  Participant Experiences in a Human Biomonitoring Study: Follow-Up Interviews with Participants of the Flemish Environment and Health Study.

Authors:  Bert Morrens; Hans Jonker; Elly Den Hond; Dries Coertjens; Ann Colles; Greet Schoeters; Nicolas Van Larebeke; Tim Nawrot; Adrian Covaci; Vera Nelen; Frédéric Vandermoere; Ilse Loots
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2021-03-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.