BACKGROUND: Although increased pulmonary pressure is caused by changes in the pulmonary vasculature, prognosis in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) is strongly associated with right ventricular (RV) function. The aim of this study was to describe the best RV adaptive remodeling pattern to increased afterload in IPAH. METHODS: In 60 consecutive patients with IPAH, RV morphologic and functional features were evaluated by echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. To address the question of the best RV adaptation pattern, we divided the study population into two groups by the median value of RV mass/volume ratio (0.46) because this parameter allows the distinction between RV eccentric (≤0.46) and concentric hypertrophy (>0.46). The two groups were compared for RV remodeling and systolic function parameters, World Health Organization class, pulmonary hemodynamics, and 6-minute walk test. RESULTS: Despite similar pulmonary vascular resistance, mean pulmonary pressure, and compliance, patients with eccentric hypertrophy had advanced World Health Organization class and worse 6-minute walk test, hemodynamics, RV remodeling, and systolic function parameters compared with patients with concentric hypertrophy. The group with concentric hypertrophy had higher RV to pulmonary arterial coupling compared with the group with eccentric hypertrophy (1.24 ± 0.26 vs 0.83 ± 0.33, p = 0.0001), indicating higher RV efficiency. A significant correlation was found between pulmonary vascular resistance and RV to pulmonary arterial coupling (r = -0.55, r(2) = 0.31, p = 0.0001), with patients with RV mass/volume ratio > 0.46 at the higher part of the scatterplot, confirming more adequate RV function. CONCLUSIONS: Concentric hypertrophy might represent a more favorable RV adaptive remodeling pattern to increased afterload in IPAH because it is associated with more suitable systolic function and mechanical efficiency.
BACKGROUND: Although increased pulmonary pressure is caused by changes in the pulmonary vasculature, prognosis in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) is strongly associated with right ventricular (RV) function. The aim of this study was to describe the best RV adaptive remodeling pattern to increased afterload in IPAH. METHODS: In 60 consecutive patients with IPAH, RV morphologic and functional features were evaluated by echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. To address the question of the best RV adaptation pattern, we divided the study population into two groups by the median value of RV mass/volume ratio (0.46) because this parameter allows the distinction between RV eccentric (≤0.46) and concentric hypertrophy (>0.46). The two groups were compared for RV remodeling and systolic function parameters, World Health Organization class, pulmonary hemodynamics, and 6-minute walk test. RESULTS: Despite similar pulmonary vascular resistance, mean pulmonary pressure, and compliance, patients with eccentric hypertrophy had advanced World Health Organization class and worse 6-minute walk test, hemodynamics, RV remodeling, and systolic function parameters compared with patients with concentric hypertrophy. The group with concentric hypertrophy had higher RV to pulmonary arterial coupling compared with the group with eccentric hypertrophy (1.24 ± 0.26 vs 0.83 ± 0.33, p = 0.0001), indicating higher RV efficiency. A significant correlation was found between pulmonary vascular resistance and RV to pulmonary arterial coupling (r = -0.55, r(2) = 0.31, p = 0.0001), with patients with RV mass/volume ratio > 0.46 at the higher part of the scatterplot, confirming more adequate RV function. CONCLUSIONS: Concentric hypertrophy might represent a more favorable RV adaptive remodeling pattern to increased afterload in IPAH because it is associated with more suitable systolic function and mechanical efficiency.
Authors: Michal Schäfer; Cynthia Myers; R Dale Brown; Maria G Frid; Wei Tan; Kendall Hunter; Kurt R Stenmark Journal: Curr Hypertens Rep Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 5.369
Authors: Rebecca Johnson Kameny; Youping He; Catherine Morris; Christine Sun; Michael Johengen; Wenhui Gong; Gary W Raff; Sanjeev A Datar; Peter E Oishi; Jeffrey R Fineman Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2015-05-01 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Khodr Tello; Manuel J Richter; Athithan Yogeswaran; Hossein A Ghofrani; Robert Naeije; Rebecca Vanderpool; Henning Gall; Ryan J Tedford; Werner Seeger; Tim Lahm Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Johannes Krämer; Felix Kreuzer; Michael Kaestner; Peter Bride; Fabian von Scheidt; Jannos Siaplaouras; Heiner Latus; Dietmar Schranz; Christian Apitz Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2018-03-14 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Reza Avazmohammadi; Emilio Mendiola; David Li; Peter Vanderslice; Richard Dixon; Michael Sacks Journal: J Biomech Eng Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 2.097
Authors: Jonathan Kochav; Jennifer Chen; Lakshmi Nambiar; Hannah W Mitlak; Arielle Kushman; Razia Sultana; Evelyn Horn; Arindam RoyChoudhury; Richard B Devereux; Jonathan W Weinsaft; Jiwon Kim Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2021-03-11 Impact factor: 7.722