Nicolas Baumard1, Alexandre Hyafil2, Ian Morris3, Pascal Boyer4. 1. Philosophy, Politics and Economics Program, University of Pennsylvania, 311 Claudia Cohen Hall, 249 S 36th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Département d'Études Cognitives, Ecole Normale Supérieure, 29 Rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France. Electronic address: nbaumard@gmail.com. 2. Département d'Études Cognitives, Ecole Normale Supérieure, 29 Rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France. 3. Department of Classics, Stanford University, Building 110, 450 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA 94305-2145, USA. 4. Department of Psychology, Washington University, Saint Louis, MO 63130, USA; Université de Lyon, 14 Avenue Berthelot, 69007 Lyon, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Between roughly 500 BCE and 300 BCE, three distinct regions, the Yangtze and Yellow River Valleys, the Eastern Mediterranean, and the Ganges Valley, saw the emergence of highly similar religious traditions with an unprecedented emphasis on self-discipline and asceticism and with "otherworldly," often moralizing, doctrines, including Buddhism, Jainism, Brahmanism, Daoism, Second Temple Judaism, and Stoicism, with later offshoots, such as Christianity, Manichaeism, and Islam. This cultural convergence, often called the "Axial Age," presents a puzzle: why did this emerge at the same time as distinct moralizing religions, with highly similar features in different civilizations? The puzzle may be solved by quantitative historical evidence that demonstrates an exceptional uptake in energy capture (a proxy for general prosperity) just before the Axial Age in these three regions. RESULTS: Statistical modeling confirms that economic development, not political complexity or population size, accounts for the timing of the Axial Age. CONCLUSIONS: We discussed several possible causal pathways, including the development of literacy and urban life, and put forward the idea, inspired by life history theory, that absolute affluence would have impacted human motivation and reward systems, nudging people away from short-term strategies (resource acquisition and coercive interactions) and promoting long-term strategies (self-control techniques and cooperative interactions).
BACKGROUND: Between roughly 500 BCE and 300 BCE, three distinct regions, the Yangtze and Yellow River Valleys, the Eastern Mediterranean, and the Ganges Valley, saw the emergence of highly similar religious traditions with an unprecedented emphasis on self-discipline and asceticism and with "otherworldly," often moralizing, doctrines, including Buddhism, Jainism, Brahmanism, Daoism, Second Temple Judaism, and Stoicism, with later offshoots, such as Christianity, Manichaeism, and Islam. This cultural convergence, often called the "Axial Age," presents a puzzle: why did this emerge at the same time as distinct moralizing religions, with highly similar features in different civilizations? The puzzle may be solved by quantitative historical evidence that demonstrates an exceptional uptake in energy capture (a proxy for general prosperity) just before the Axial Age in these three regions. RESULTS: Statistical modeling confirms that economic development, not political complexity or population size, accounts for the timing of the Axial Age. CONCLUSIONS: We discussed several possible causal pathways, including the development of literacy and urban life, and put forward the idea, inspired by life history theory, that absolute affluence would have impacted human motivation and reward systems, nudging people away from short-term strategies (resource acquisition and coercive interactions) and promoting long-term strategies (self-control techniques and cooperative interactions).
Authors: Myron Tsikandilakis; Man Qing Leong; Zhaoliang Yu; Georgios Paterakis; Persefoni Bali; Jan Derrfuss; Pierre-Alexis Mevel; Alison Milbank; Eddie M W Tong; Christopher Madan; Peter Mitchell Journal: Psychol Res Date: 2021-01-23
Authors: Benjamin Grant Purzycki; Cody T Ross; Coren Apicella; Quentin D Atkinson; Emma Cohen; Rita Anne McNamara; Aiyana K Willard; Dimitris Xygalatas; Ara Norenzayan; Joseph Henrich Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-03-07 Impact factor: 3.240