Literature DB >> 2549683

Evaluation of techniques to demonstrate foot-and-mouth disease virus in bovine tongue epithelium: comparison of the sensitivity of cattle, mice, primary cell cultures, cryopreserved cell cultures and established cell lines.

C House1, J A House.   

Abstract

Tongue epithelia infected with each of the 7 serotypes of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) were used to evaluate in vivo and in vitro systems for the detection of FMDV. Cattle inoculated by the intradermal route in the tongue (IDL) and suckling mice inoculated intraperitoneally were compared for susceptibility to FMDV with freshly prepared bovine thyroid cell cultures; cultures from cryopreserved bovine thyroid, bone marrow, mammary gland, myocardium, tongue, ovary and kidney cells; cultures from cryopreserved embryonic ovine kidney, newborn ovine kidney, ovine testicle, bone marrow, and chloroid plexus cells; and the continuous porcine kidney cell lines MVPK-1 and S6. The mean titers determined for each serotype in each system were statistically compared. The FMDV titers obtained in freshly prepared bovine thyroid cell cultures and by cattle IDL inoculation were the highest and were statistically indistinguishable. The titers obtained by suckling mouse inoculation were significantly lower than the titers obtained in thyroid cultures for serotypes A, C, Asia 1, and SAT 3. The cattle IDL assay was significantly more sensitive than the mouse assay for serotype A. The cell cultures from the cryopreserved newborn ovine kidney and embryonic ovine kidney were significantly less susceptible to serotype Asia 1 when compared with the fresh bovine thyroid cultures, but not significantly different when compared with the cattle assay for all serotypes. Cryopreservation of bovine thyroid cells directly after trypsinization resulted in the loss of susceptibility to FMDV serotype SAT 2. The other cryopreserved cell culture systems exhibited no or minimal susceptibility to all 7 serotypes, or exhibited considerable inconsistency. The established cell lines MVPK-1 and S6 were not susceptible to serotype A, and were less sensitive to serotype C than other culture systems. Quality control of cell cultures used to evaluate field specimens for FMDV was critical. The cell cultures of cryopreserved ovine kidney cells provided the most practical diagnostic system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2549683     DOI: 10.1016/0378-1135(89)90033-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Microbiol        ISSN: 0378-1135            Impact factor:   3.293


  12 in total

1.  Inhibition of L-deleted foot-and-mouth disease virus replication by alpha/beta interferon involves double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase.

Authors:  J Chinsangaram; M Koster; M J Grubman
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 2.  Diagnostic assays developed for the control of foot-and-mouth disease in India.

Authors:  Gaurav Kumar Sharma; Sonalika Mahajan; Rakesh Matura; Saravanan Subramaniam; Rajeev Ranjan; Jitendra Biswal; Manoranjan Rout; Jajati Keshari Mohapatra; Bana Bihari Dash; Aniket Sanyal; Bramhadev Pattnaik
Journal:  World J Virol       Date:  2015-08-12

3.  Foot-and-mouth disease virus O1Lombardy is biochemically related to O2 isolates.

Authors:  O Krebs; H G Berger; W Niedbalski; O Marquardt
Journal:  Virus Genes       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.332

4.  Ability of foot-and-mouth disease virus to form plaques in cell culture is associated with suppression of alpha/beta interferon.

Authors:  J Chinsangaram; M E Piccone; M J Grubman
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Analysis of sites of foot and mouth disease virus persistence in carrier cattle via the polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  M L Prato Murphy; R F Meyer; C Mebus; A A Schudel; M Rodriguez
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.574

6.  Evaluation of infectivity and transmission of different Asian foot-and-mouth disease viruses in swine.

Authors:  Juan M Pacheco; P W Mason
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.672

7.  Foot-and-mouth disease virus receptors: comparison of bovine alpha(V) integrin utilization by type A and O viruses.

Authors:  Hernando Duque; Barry Baxt
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.103

8.  A continuous bovine kidney cell line constitutively expressing bovine αvβ6 integrin has increased susceptibility to foot-and-mouth disease virus.

Authors:  Michael LaRocco; Peter W Krug; Ed Kramer; Zaheer Ahmed; Juan M Pacheco; Hernando Duque; Barry Baxt; Luis L Rodriguez
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  A Brief Review on Diagnosis of Foot-and-Mouth Disease of Livestock: Conventional to Molecular Tools.

Authors:  Neeta Longjam; Rajib Deb; A K Sarmah; Tilling Tayo; V B Awachat; V K Saxena
Journal:  Vet Med Int       Date:  2011-07-06

10.  Inhibitors of the interferon response enhance virus replication in vitro.

Authors:  Claire E Stewart; Richard E Randall; Catherine S Adamson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.