Foot-and-mouth disease virus receptors: comparison of bovine alpha(V) integrin utilization by type A and O viruses.

Three members of the alpha(V) integrin family of cellular receptors, alpha(V)beta(1), alpha(V)beta(3), and alpha(V)beta(6), have been identified as receptors for foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) in vitro. The virus interacts with these receptors via a highly conserved arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) amino acid sequence motif located within the betaG-betaH (G-H) loop of VP1. Other alpha(V) integrins, as well as several other integrins, recognize and bind to RGD motifs on their natural ligands and also may be candidate receptors for FMDV. To analyze the roles of the alpha(V) integrins from a susceptible species as viral receptors, we molecularly cloned the bovine beta(1), beta(5), and beta(6) integrin subunits. Using these subunits, along with previously cloned bovine alpha(V) and beta(3) subunits, in a transient expression assay system, we compared the efficiencies of infection mediated by alpha(V)beta(1), alpha(V)beta(3), alpha(V)beta(5), and alpha(V)beta(6) among three strains of FMDV serotype A and two strains of serotype O. While all the viruses could infect cells expressing these integrins, they exhibited different efficiencies of integrin utilization. All the type A viruses used alpha(V)beta(3) and alpha(V)beta(6) with relatively high efficiency, while only one virus utilized alpha(V)beta(1) with moderate efficiency. In contrast, both type O viruses utilized alpha(V)beta(6) and alpha(V)beta(1) with higher efficiency than alpha(V)beta(3). Only low levels of viral replication were detected in alpha(V)beta(5)-expressing cells infected with either serotype. Experiments in which the ligand-binding domains among the beta subunits were exchanged indicated that this region of the integrin subunit appears to contribute to the differences in integrin utilizations among strains. In contrast, the G-H loops of the different viruses do not appear to be involved in this phenomenon. Thus, the ability of the virus to utilize multiple integrins in vitro may be a reflection of the use of multiple receptors during the course of infection within the susceptible host.