Literature DB >> 25494952

Virtual reality lead extraction as a method for training new physicians: a pilot study.

Melanie Maytin1, Thomas P Daily, Roger G Carillo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is estimated that the demand for transvenous lead extraction (TLE) has reached an annual extraction rate of nearly 24,000 patients worldwide. Despite technologic advances, TLE still has the potential for significant morbidity and mortality. Complication rates with TLE directly parallel operator experience. However, obtaining adequate training during and postfellowship can be difficult. Given the potential for catastrophic complications and the steep learning curve (up to 300 cases) associated with this procedure, we sought to validate a virtual reality (VR) lead extraction simulator as an innovative training and evaluation tool for physicians new to TLE.
METHODS: We randomized eight electrophysiology fellows to VR simulator versus conventional training. We compared procedural skill competency between the groups using simulator competency, tactile measurements, markers of proficiency and attitudes, and cognitive abilities battery.
RESULTS: Practical skills and simulator complications differed significantly between the VR simulator and conventional training groups. The VR simulator group executed patient preparation and procedure performance better than the conventional group (P < 0.01). All four fellows randomized to conventional training experienced a simulator complication (two superior vena cava [SVC] tears, three right ventricle [RV] avulsions) versus one fellow in the VR simulator group (one SVC tear) (P = 0.02). Tactile measurements revealed a trend toward excess pushing versus pulling forces among the conventionally trained group. The time for lead removal was also significantly higher in the conventional training group (12.46 minutes vs 5.54 minutes, P = 0.02). There was no significant difference in baseline or posttraining cognitive ability.
CONCLUSIONS: We contend that the implementation of alternative training tools such as a VR simulation model will improve physician training and allow for an innovative pathway to assess the achievement of competency. ©2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ICD; lead extraction; lead management; medical simulation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25494952     DOI: 10.1111/pace.12546

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  7 in total

Review 1.  Transvenous Lead Extractions: Current Approaches and Future Trends.

Authors:  Adryan A Perez; Frank W Woo; Darren C Tsang; Roger G Carrillo
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2018-08

2.  Virtual reality and the transformation of medical education.

Authors:  Jack Pottle
Journal:  Future Healthc J       Date:  2019-10

Review 3.  A New Educational Framework to Improve Lifelong Learning for Cardiologists.

Authors:  Akhil Narang; Poonam Velagapudi; Bharath Rajagopalan; Bryan LeBude; Aaron P Kithcart; David Snipelisky; Shashank S Sinha
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  The comparison of teaching efficiency between virtual reality and traditional education in medical education: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guanjie Zhao; Minjie Fan; Yibiao Yuan; Fei Zhao; Huaxing Huang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-02

5.  Virtual, Augmented, and Alternate Reality in Medical Education: Socially Distanced but Fully Immersed.

Authors:  Stacey M Kassutto; Cameron Baston; Caitlin Clancy
Journal:  ATS Sch       Date:  2021-10-18

Review 6.  How, for Whom, and in Which Contexts or Conditions Augmented and Virtual Reality Training Works in Upskilling Health Care Workers: Realist Synthesis.

Authors:  Norina Gasteiger; Sabine N van der Veer; Paul Wilson; Dawn Dowding
Journal:  JMIR Serious Games       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 4.143

7.  Transvenous Lead Extraction (TLE) Procedure: Experience from a Tertiary Care Center in Thailand.

Authors:  Natcha Soontornmanokati; Chulaporn Sirikhamkorn; Nilubon Methachittiphan; Kumpol Chintanavilas; Sanatcha Apakuppakul; Tachapong Ngarmukos; Sirin Apiyasawat; Wachara Lohawijarn; Pakorn Chandanamattha
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2022-02-24
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.