Literature DB >> 2549450

Double-blind study of true vs. sham plasma exchange in patients treated with immunosuppression for acute attacks of multiple sclerosis.

H L Weiner1, P C Dau, B O Khatri, J H Petajan, G Birnbaum, M P McQuillen, M T Fosburg, M Feldstein, E J Orav.   

Abstract

We enrolled 116 patients in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind controlled trial of an 8-week course of 11 plasma exchange (PE) treatments in exacerbations of MS. The control group received sham PE, and both groups received identical treatment with IM ACTH and oral cyclophosphamide. Serum IgG decreased in the PE and sham treatment groups by 76% versus 22% by treatment 5, and by 64% versus 14% by treatment 11. PE also produced significant reductions in IgA, IgM, C3, and fibrinogen. PE patients had moderately enhanced improvement at 2 weeks relative to the sham group. PE patients with relapsing/remitting disease had significantly enhanced improvement at 4 weeks and there was also an increased improvement at 12 months, although this latter effect disappeared when we analyzed relapsing/remitting patients as a separate subgroup. Life table analysis showed the median time to recover preattack disability status was shorter in PE- than in sham-treated relapsing/remitting patients (4 vs. 13 weeks), a result confirmed by raw disability status scores in which there was recovery to their average preattack disability score by 3 months. PE given with ACTH plus cyclophosphamide enhances recovery from an exacerbation of disease in relapsing/remitting patients, although we observed no clear long-term benefits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2549450     DOI: 10.1212/wnl.39.9.1143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  27 in total

Review 1.  [Plasma exchange as a therapeutic option in neurological disorders].

Authors:  H C Lehmann; H P Hartung; G R Hetzel; B C Kieseier
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 2.  Cyclophosphamide for multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  L La Mantia; C Milanese; N Mascoli; R D'Amico; B Weinstock-Guttman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-01-24

3.  Acute demyelinating disorders of the central nervous system.

Authors:  Meghan K Harris; Amir Hadi Maghzi; Masoud Etemadifar; Roger E Kelley; Eduardo Gonzalez-Toledo; Alireza Minagar
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 4.  Corticosteroids and plasma exchange in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Hayretin Tumani
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Differences in the Reponses to Apheresis Therapy of Patients With 3 Histopathologically Classified Immunopathological Patterns of Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Lidia Stork; David Ellenberger; Tim Beißbarth; Tim Friede; Claudia F Lucchinetti; Wolfgang Brück; Imke Metz
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 18.302

6.  Assessing relapses and response to relapse treatment in patients with multiple sclerosis: a nursing perspective.

Authors:  Amy Perrin Ross; June Halper; Colleen J Harris
Journal:  Int J MS Care       Date:  2012

7.  Neuroimmunology: Assessing the value of plasma exchange in neurology.

Authors:  Richard Hughes; Hans-Peter Hartung
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 8.  Multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Richard Nicholas; Jeremy Chataway
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2009-05-14

Review 9.  Treatment of acute relapses in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Regina Berkovich
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 10.  Immunomodulatory therapies in neurologic critical care.

Authors:  Logan M McDaneld; Jeremy D Fields; Dennis N Bourdette; Anish Bhardwaj
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 3.210

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.