| Literature DB >> 25492725 |
Yap Boum1,2, Daniel Atwine3, Patrick Orikiriza4, Justus Assimwe5, Anne-Laure Page6, Juliet Mwanga-Amumpaire7,8, Maryline Bonnet9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the association between gender and risk of TB infection. We sought to assess the impact of gender on TB prevalence among people with presumptive tuberculosis at a regional referral hospital in a high TB and HIV prevalence setting.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25492725 PMCID: PMC4265338 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-014-0638-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Figure 1Study profile (*PWPTB patient with presumptive tuberculosis). Number of patients enrolled in the study, results by diagnosis tools with the proportion of positive results among the general population and the percentage of males in the patients with a positive result.
Patient characteristics and by gender
| Variables | Total n (%) | Male n (%) | Female n (%) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 863 (100.0) | 421 (48.8) | 442 (51.2) | 0.737 |
|
| 664 (76.9) | 326 (49.1) | 338 (50.9) | |
|
| 199 (23.1) | 95 (47.7) | 104 (52.3) | |
|
| mean (SD) | mean (SD) | mean (SD) | |
| 39.7 (13.9) | 41.2 (14.3) | 38.2 (13.4) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| <25 | 102 (12.0) | 49 (48.0) | 53 (52.0) | |
| 25-35 | 269 (31.6) | 113 (42.0) | 156 (58.0) | |
| 36-45 | 241 (28.3) | 119 (49.4) | 122 (50.6) | |
| >45 | 240 (28.2) | 139 (57.9) | 101 (42.1) | |
|
|
| |||
| Negative | 345 (42.1) | 196 (56.8) | 149 (43.2) | |
| Positive | 475 (57.9) | 207 (43.6) | 268 (56.4) | |
|
| 0.411 | |||
| Urban | 427 (49.6) | 203 (47.5) | 224 (52.5) | |
| Rural | 433 (50.4) | 218 (50.6) | 215 (49.4) | |
|
|
| |||
| Suggestive of TB | 433 (55.6) | 258 (66.5) | 175 (44.8) | |
| Non suggestive of TB | 346 (44.4) | 130 (33.5) | 216 (55.2) | |
Specimens’ characteristics and laboratory results by gender and study
| Colorimetric study (sputum producers) | Total n (%) | Male n (%) | Female n (%) | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sputum volume (n = 689) More than 1 ml | 672 (97.5) | 331 (97.6) | 341 (97.4) | 0.858 |
| Sputum Quality (n = 681) Purulent-mucopurulent | 223 (32.7) | 117 (35.2) | 106 (30.4) | 0.176 |
| Microscopy (N = 664) Positive | 106 (16.0) | 69 (21.2) | 37 (10.9) | <0.001 |
| TB Culture (N = 618) Positive | 147 (23.8) | 90 (29.3) | 57 (18.3) | 0.001 |
| Xray (N = 605) suggestive | 347 (57.4) | 208 (68.4) | 139 (46.2) | < 0.001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Microscopy (N = 198) Positive | 26 (13.1) | 15 (15.8) | 11 (10.7) | 0.288 |
| TB Culture (N = 198) Positive | 51 (25.7) | 32 (33.7) | 19 (18.5) | 0.014 |
| Xray (N = 174) suggestive | 86 (49.4) | 50 (59.5) | 36 (40.0) | 0.010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Microscopy (N = 862) Positive | 132 (15.3) | 84 (20.0) | 48 (10.9) | < 0.001 |
| TB Culture (N = 816) Positive | 198 (24.3) | 122 (30.3) | 76 (18.4) | < 0.001 |
| Xray (N = 779) suggestive | 433 (55.6) | 258 (66.5) | 175 (44.8) | < 0.001 |
Figure 2Proportion of X-ray suggestive of TB and TB positive results by microscopy and culture stratified by gender. The right column represents the proportion of male, the middle column represent the proportion of female and the left column the proportion of both in the general population.
Figure 3Proportions of microscopy results by gender in sputum producers with presumptive TB. The right column represents the proportion of male, the middle column represent the proportion of female and the left column the proportion of both in the general population.
Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios for the relationship between gender and TB culture positivity (N = 779)
| Characteristics | OR (95% CI) | P value | AOR (95% CI) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
| Female | REF | REF | ||
| Male | 1.9 (1.40-2.69) | 2.2 (1.56-3.18) | ||
|
|
|
| ||
| >45 | REF | REF | ||
| 36-45 | 1.8 (1.09-2.85) | 1.88 (1.13-3.12) | ||
| 25-35 | 2.2 (1.40-3.52) | 2.5 (1.56-4.15) | ||
| <25 | 3.3 (1.90-5.71) | 3.4 (1.90-6.11) | ||
|
| ||||
| Non Suggestive of TB | REF | |||
| Suggestive of TB | 5.0 (3.29-7.57) |
| ||
|
| ||||
| Negative | REF | |||
| Positive | 575 (139.3-2378.9) |
| ||
|
| 0.5751 | |||
| Non-productive | REF | |||
| Productive | 1.0 (0.77-1.61) | |||
|
| 0.1914 | |||
| Negative | REF | |||
| Positive | 0.8 (0.57-1.12) | |||
|
| 0.977 | |||
| Urban | REF | |||
| Rural | 1.0 (0.73-1.38) |