SETTING: National Health Laboratory Services tuberculosis (TB) laboratory, South Africa. OBJECTIVES: To compare Mycobacterium Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) with Löwenstein-Jensen (LJ) medium with regard to Mycobacterium tuberculosis yield, time to positive culture and contamination, and to assess MGIT cost-effectiveness. DESIGN: Sputum from gold miners was cultured on MGIT and LJ. We estimated cost per culture, and, for smear-negative samples, incremental cost per additional M. tuberculosis gained with MGIT using a decision-tree model. RESULTS: Among 1267 specimens, MGIT vs. LJ gave a higher yield of mycobacteria (29.7% vs. 22.8%), higher contamination (16.7% vs. 9.3%) and shorter time to positive culture (median 14 vs. 25 days for smear-negative specimens). Among smear-negative samples that were culture-positive on MGIT but negative/contaminated on LJ, 77.3% were non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). Cost per culture on LJ, MGIT and MGIT+LJ was respectively US$12.35, US$16.62 and US$19.29. The incremental cost per additional M. tuberculosis identified by standard biochemical tests and microscopic cording was respectively US$504.08 and US$328.10 using MGIT vs. LJ, or US$160.80 and US$$109.07 using MGIT+LJ vs. LJ alone. CONCLUSION: MGIT gives higher yield and faster results at relatively high cost. The high proportion of NTM underscores the need for rapid speciation tests. Minimising contaminated cultures is key to cost-effectiveness.
SETTING: National Health Laboratory Services tuberculosis (TB) laboratory, South Africa. OBJECTIVES: To compare Mycobacterium Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) with Löwenstein-Jensen (LJ) medium with regard to Mycobacterium tuberculosis yield, time to positive culture and contamination, and to assess MGIT cost-effectiveness. DESIGN: Sputum from gold miners was cultured on MGIT and LJ. We estimated cost per culture, and, for smear-negative samples, incremental cost per additional M. tuberculosis gained with MGIT using a decision-tree model. RESULTS: Among 1267 specimens, MGIT vs. LJ gave a higher yield of mycobacteria (29.7% vs. 22.8%), higher contamination (16.7% vs. 9.3%) and shorter time to positive culture (median 14 vs. 25 days for smear-negative specimens). Among smear-negative samples that were culture-positive on MGIT but negative/contaminated on LJ, 77.3% were non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). Cost per culture on LJ, MGIT and MGIT+LJ was respectively US$12.35, US$16.62 and US$19.29. The incremental cost per additional M. tuberculosis identified by standard biochemical tests and microscopic cording was respectively US$504.08 and US$328.10 using MGIT vs. LJ, or US$160.80 and US$$109.07 using MGIT+LJ vs. LJ alone. CONCLUSION: MGIT gives higher yield and faster results at relatively high cost. The high proportion of NTM underscores the need for rapid speciation tests. Minimising contaminated cultures is key to cost-effectiveness.
Authors: Andrew J Brent; Daisy Mugo; Robert Musyimi; Agnes Mutiso; Susan Morpeth; Michael Levin; J Anthony G Scott Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2011-10-12 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: F C Semitala; L H Chaisson; S den Boon; N Walter; A Cattamanchi; M Awor; J Katende; L Huang; M Joloba; H Albert; M R Kamya; J L Davis Journal: Public Health Action Date: 2015-05-08
Authors: Amanda C Brown; Josephine M Bryant; Katja Einer-Jensen; Jolyon Holdstock; Darren T Houniet; Jacqueline Z M Chan; Daniel P Depledge; Vladyslav Nikolayevskyy; Agnieszka Broda; Madeline J Stone; Mette T Christiansen; Rachel Williams; Michael B McAndrew; Helena Tutill; Julianne Brown; Mark Melzer; Caryn Rosmarin; Timothy D McHugh; Robert J Shorten; Francis Drobniewski; Graham Speight; Judith Breuer Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2015-05-13 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Mu Yeol Lee; Taehoon Lee; Min Ho Kim; Sung Soo Byun; Myung Kwan Ko; Jung Min Hong; Kyung Hoon Kim; Seung Won Ra; Kwang Won Seo; Yangjin Jegal; Joseph Jeong; Jong Joon Ahn Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Anne F Luetkemeyer; Michelle A Kendall; Xingye Wu; Maria Cristina Lourenço; Ute Jentsch; Susan Swindells; Sarojini S Qasba; Jorge Sanchez; Diane V Havlir; Beatriz Grinsztejn; Ian M Sanne; Cynthia Firnhaber Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2014-01-15 Impact factor: 5.948