Literature DB >> 25491233

Laryngotracheal reconstruction: a ten-year review of risk factors for decannulation failure.

Kareem O Tawfik1, Jeffrey J Houlton, William Compton, Jun Ying, Siddarth M Khosla.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To determine risk factors for decannulation failure after laryngotracheal reconstruction performed at a single institution over a 10-year period. STUDY
DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study.
METHODS: The study population included 95 adult patients who underwent laryngotracheal reconstruction at a single tertiary care medical center between 2003 and 2012. Data were retrospectively reviewed.
RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of 95 subjects (60% female) with a median (range) age of 48 (21-82) years. Fourteen patients failed to decannulate by one postoperative year and were more likely to have diabetes, gastroesophageal reflux disease, grade 4 stenosis, T-tube requirement, secondary tracheotomy, double-stage reconstruction, and more endoscopic dilations within the first postoperative year. T-tube requirement was highly predictive of decannulation failure, with an odds ratio of 50.6 in univariate analysis and 93.7 in multivariate analysis. Grade 4 stenosis and a requirement of at least one postoperative endoscopic dilation were also found significant under both univariate and multivariate models. Gastroesophageal reflux disease was marginally significant under the univariate and multivariate models (P = .059 and .088, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of preoperative and postoperative factors may indicate a higher risk of decannulation failure after laryngotracheal reconstruction. Patients with diabetes, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and grade 4 stenosis are at higher risk for decannulation failure. Requirement of T-tube placement and requirement of endoscopic dilation are predictive of decannulation failure.
© 2014 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laryngology; gastroesophageal reflux; laryngotracheal reconstruction; obesity; smoking; subglottic stenosis; tobacco; tracheal reconstruction; tracheal stenosis; tracheostomy dependence

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25491233     DOI: 10.1002/lary.24963

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  6 in total

1.  Association Between Red Blood Cell Distribution Width and Outcomes of Open Airway Reconstruction Surgery in Adults.

Authors:  Deborah X Xie; Saad C Rehman; David O Francis; James L Netterville; C Gaelyn Garrett; Alexander Gelbard; Brittany Lipscomb; Christopher T Wootten
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 6.223

2.  Voice Outcomes in Laryngotracheal Stenosis: Impact of the Montgomery T-tube.

Authors:  Vaninder K Dhillon; Lee M Akst; Simon R Best; Alexander T Hillel
Journal:  Clin Surg       Date:  2018-01-10

Review 3.  Laryngotracheal stenosis: Mechanistic review.

Authors:  Delaney J Carpenter; Osama A Hamdi; Ariel M Finberg; James J Daniero
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Characterization of Fibroblasts in Iatrogenic Laryngotracheal Stenosis and Type II Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Ioan Lina; Hsiu-Wen Tsai; Dacheng Ding; Ruth Davis; Kevin M Motz; Alexander T Hillel
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 2.970

Review 5.  Impact of gastroesophageal reflux in the pathogenesis of tracheal stenosis.

Authors:  Paulo Francisco Guerreiro Cardoso; Helio Minamoto; Benoit Jacques Bibas; Paulo Manuel Pego-Fernandes
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.241

6.  Pediatric airway reconstruction: results after implementation of an airway team in Brazil.

Authors:  Rebecca Maunsell; Nayara Soares Lacerda; Luciahelena Prata; Marcelo Brandão
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-12-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.