Literature DB >> 25490178

Assessment of bootstrap resampling performance for PET data.

P J Markiewicz1, A J Reader, J C Matthews.   

Abstract

Bootstrap resampling has been successfully used for estimation of statistical uncertainty of parameters such as tissue metabolism, blood flow or displacement fields for image registration. The performance of bootstrap resampling as applied to PET list-mode data of the human brain and dedicated phantoms is assessed in a novel and systematic way such that: (1) the assessment is carried out in two resampling stages: the 'real world' stage where multiple reference datasets of varying statistical level are generated and the 'bootstrap world' stage where corresponding bootstrap replicates are generated from the reference datasets. (2) All resampled datasets were reconstructed yielding images from which multiple voxel and regions of interest (ROI) values were extracted to form corresponding distributions between the two stages. (3) The difference between the distributions from both stages was quantified using the Jensen-Shannon divergence and the first four moments. It was found that the bootstrap distributions are consistently different to the real world distributions across the statistical levels. The difference was explained by a shift in the mean (up to 33% for voxels and 14% for ROIs) being proportional to the inverse square root of the statistical level (number of counts). Other moments were well replicated by the bootstrap although for very low statistical levels the estimation of the variance was poor. Therefore, the bootstrap method should be used with care when estimating systematic errors (bias) and variance when very low statistical levels are present such as in early time frames of dynamic acquisitions, when the underlying population may not be sufficiently represented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25490178     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/1/279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  6 in total

1.  Bootstrap-Optimised Regularised Image Reconstruction for Emission Tomography.

Authors:  Andrew J Reader; Sam Ellis
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Uncertainty analysis of MR-PET image registration for precision neuro-PET imaging.

Authors:  Pawel J Markiewicz; Julian C Matthews; John Ashburner; David M Cash; David L Thomas; Enrico De Vita; Anna Barnes; M Jorge Cardoso; Marc Modat; Richard Brown; Kris Thielemans; Casper da Costa-Luis; Isadora Lopes Alves; Juan Domingo Gispert; Mark E Schmidt; Paul Marsden; Alexander Hammers; Sebastien Ourselin; Frederik Barkhof
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  A method to assess image quality for Low-dose PET: analysis of SNR, CNR, bias and image noise.

Authors:  Jianhua Yan; Josh Schaefferkoette; Maurizio Conti; David Townsend
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.909

4.  Association between fetal sex and maternal plasma microRNA responses to prenatal alcohol exposure: evidence from a birth outcome-stratified cohort.

Authors:  Nihal A Salem; Amanda H Mahnke; Alan B Wells; Alexander M Tseng; Lyubov Yevtushok; Natalya Zymak-Zakutnya; Wladimir Wertlecki; Christina D Chambers; Rajesh C Miranda
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 5.027

5.  Noise-Induced Variability of Immuno-PET with Zirconium-89-Labeled Antibodies: an Analysis Based on Count-Reduced Clinical Images.

Authors:  Yvonne W S Jauw; Dennis F Heijtel; Josée M Zijlstra; Otto S Hoekstra; Henrica C W de Vet; Danielle J Vugts; Henk M Verheul; Ronald Boellaard; Sonja Zweegman; Guus A M S van Dongen; C Willemien Menke-van der Houven van Oordt; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Marc C Huisman
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Advanced quantitative evaluation of PET systems using the ACR phantom and NiftyPET software.

Authors:  Pawel J Markiewicz; Casper da Costa-Luis; J Dickson; A Barnes; G Krokos; J MacKewn; T Clark; C Wimberley; G MacNaught; M M Yaqub; J D Gispert; B F Hutton; P Marsden; A Hammers; A J Reader; S Ourselin; K Herholz; J C Matthews; F Barkhof
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 4.506

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.