T Asmis1, S Berry2, R Cosby3, K Chan2, N Coburn2, M Rother4. 1. The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON. 2. Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON. 3. Program in Evidence-Based Care, McMaster University, Juravinski Site, Hamilton, ON. 4. Peel Regional Cancer Centre, Mississauga, ON.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Before the emergence of first-line combination chemotherapy, the standard of care for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mcrc) was first-line monotherapy with modulated 5-fluorouracil. Several large phase iii randomized controlled trials, now completed, have assessed whether a planned sequential chemotherapy strategy-beginning with fluoropyrimidine monotherapy until treatment failure, followed by another regimen (either monotherapy or combination chemotherapy) until treatment failure-could result in the same survival benefit produced with an upfront combination chemotherapy strategy, but with less toxicity for patients. METHODS: The medline and embase databases, and abstracts from meetings of the American Society for Clinical Oncology and the European Society for Medical Oncology, were searched for reports comparing a sequential strategy of chemotherapy with an upfront combination chemotherapy in adult patients with mcrc. Publications that reported efficacy or toxicity data (or both) were included. RESULTS: The five eligible trials that were identified included 4532 patients. A meta-analysis of those trials demonstrates a statistically significant survival advantage for combination chemotherapy (hazard ratio: 0.92; 95% confidence interval: 0.86 to 0.99). However, the median survival advantage (3-6 weeks in most trials) is small and of questionable clinical significance. Three trials reported first-line toxicities. Upfront combination chemotherapy results in significantly more neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and sensory neuropathy. Sequential chemotherapy results in significantly more hand-foot syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Given the small survival advantage associated with upfront combination chemotherapy, planned sequential chemotherapy and upfront combination chemotherapy can both be considered treatment strategies. Treatment should be chosen on an individual basis considering patient and tumour characteristics, toxicity of each strategy, and patient preference.
BACKGROUND: Before the emergence of first-line combination chemotherapy, the standard of care for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mcrc) was first-line monotherapy with modulated 5-fluorouracil. Several large phase iii randomized controlled trials, now completed, have assessed whether a planned sequential chemotherapy strategy-beginning with fluoropyrimidine monotherapy until treatment failure, followed by another regimen (either monotherapy or combination chemotherapy) until treatment failure-could result in the same survival benefit produced with an upfront combination chemotherapy strategy, but with less toxicity for patients. METHODS: The medline and embase databases, and abstracts from meetings of the American Society for Clinical Oncology and the European Society for Medical Oncology, were searched for reports comparing a sequential strategy of chemotherapy with an upfront combination chemotherapy in adult patients with mcrc. Publications that reported efficacy or toxicity data (or both) were included. RESULTS: The five eligible trials that were identified included 4532 patients. A meta-analysis of those trials demonstrates a statistically significant survival advantage for combination chemotherapy (hazard ratio: 0.92; 95% confidence interval: 0.86 to 0.99). However, the median survival advantage (3-6 weeks in most trials) is small and of questionable clinical significance. Three trials reported first-line toxicities. Upfront combination chemotherapy results in significantly more neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and sensory neuropathy. Sequential chemotherapy results in significantly more hand-foot syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Given the small survival advantage associated with upfront combination chemotherapy, planned sequential chemotherapy and upfront combination chemotherapy can both be considered treatment strategies. Treatment should be chosen on an individual basis considering patient and tumour characteristics, toxicity of each strategy, and patient preference.
Authors: S Giacchetti; B Perpoint; R Zidani; N Le Bail; R Faggiuolo; C Focan; P Chollet; J F Llory; Y Letourneau; B Coudert; F Bertheaut-Cvitkovic; D Larregain-Fournier; A Le Rol; S Walter; R Adam; J L Misset; F Lévi Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M Vickers; B Samson; B Colwell; C Cripps; D Jalink; S El-Sayed; E Chen; G Porter; R Goel; J Villeneuve; S Sundaresan; J Asselah; J Biagi; D Jonker; L Dawson; R Letourneau; M Rother; J Maroun; M Thirlwell; M Hussein; M Tehfe; N Perrin; N Michaud; N Hammad; P Champion; R Rajan; R Burkes; S Barrette; S Welch; N Yarom; T Asmis Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: Eric Van Cutsem; Claus-Henning Köhne; István Láng; Gunnar Folprecht; Marek P Nowacki; Stefano Cascinu; Igor Shchepotin; Joan Maurel; David Cunningham; Sabine Tejpar; Michael Schlichting; Angela Zubel; Ilhan Celik; Philippe Rougier; Fortunato Ciardiello Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-04-18 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Niall C Tebbutt; Kate Wilson; Val J Gebski; Michelle M Cummins; Diana Zannino; Guy A van Hazel; Bridget Robinson; Adam Broad; Vinod Ganju; Stephen P Ackland; Garry Forgeson; David Cunningham; Mark P Saunders; Martin R Stockler; Yujo Chua; John R Zalcberg; R John Simes; Timothy J Price Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-06-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Herbert Hurwitz; Louis Fehrenbacher; William Novotny; Thomas Cartwright; John Hainsworth; William Heim; Jordan Berlin; Ari Baron; Susan Griffing; Eric Holmgren; Napoleone Ferrara; Gwen Fyfe; Beth Rogers; Robert Ross; Fairooz Kabbinavar Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-06-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Matthew T Seymour; Timothy S Maughan; Jonathan A Ledermann; Clare Topham; Roger James; Stephen J Gwyther; David B Smith; Stephen Shepherd; Anthony Maraveyas; David R Ferry; Angela M Meade; Lindsay Thompson; Gareth O Griffiths; Mahesh Kb Parmar; Richard J Stephens Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-07-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Matthew T Seymour; Lindsay C Thompson; Harpreet S Wasan; Gary Middleton; Alison E Brewster; Stephen F Shepherd; M Sinead O'Mahony; Timothy S Maughan; Mahesh Parmar; Ruth E Langley Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-05-11 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: J Souglakos; N Ziras; S Kakolyris; I Boukovinas; N Kentepozidis; P Makrantonakis; S Xynogalos; Ch Christophyllakis; Ch Kouroussis; L Vamvakas; V Georgoulias; A Polyzos Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2012-01-12 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: E J van Helden; C W Menke-van der Houven van Oordt; M W Heymans; J C F Ket; R van den Oord; H M W Verheul Journal: Cancer Metastasis Rev Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 9.264
Authors: Noha Rashad; Mohamed Abdulla; Mohamed Farouk; Yasser Elkerm; Salem Eid Salem; Maha Yahia; Amr S Saad; Ahmed Hassan Abdel Aziz; Ghada Refaat; Ibrahim Awad; Maha ElNaggar; Khaled Kamal; Basel Refky; Mohamed Abdelkhalek; Ahmed Touny; Loay Kassem; Emad Shash; Abdelhay A Abdelhay; Bahaa Eldin Mahmoud; Karima Oualla; Nesrine Chraiet; Hussein AwadElkarim H Maki; Yasser Abdel Kader Journal: Cancer Manag Res Date: 2022-02-28 Impact factor: 3.989