Literature DB >> 25488970

Evaluation of the stage IB designation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system in breast cancer.

Elizabeth A Mittendorf1, Karla V Ballman2, Linda M McCall2, Min Yi2, Aysegul A Sahin2, Isabelle Bedrosian2, Nora Hansen2, Sheryl Gabram2, Thelma Hurd2, Armando E Giuliano2, Kelly K Hunt2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for breast cancer differentiates patients with T1 tumors and lymph node micrometastases (stage IB) from patients with T1 tumors and negative nodes (stage IA). This study was undertaken to determine the utility of the stage IB designation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The following two cohorts of patients with breast cancer were identified: 3,474 patients treated at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center from 1993 to 2007 and 4,590 patients from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0010 trial. Clinicopathologic and outcomes data were recorded, and disease was staged according to the seventh edition AJCC staging system. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS) were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test.
RESULTS: Median follow-up times were 6.1 years and 9.0 years for the MD Anderson Cancer Center and ACOSOG cohorts, respectively. In both cohorts, there were no significant differences between patients with stage IA and stage IB disease in 5- or 10-year RFS, DSS, or OS. Estrogen receptor (ER) status and grade significantly stratified patients with stage I disease with respect to RFS, DSS, and OS.
CONCLUSION: Among patients with T1 breast cancer, individuals with micrometastases and those with negative nodes have similar survival outcomes. ER status and grade are better discriminants of survival than the presence of small-volume nodal metastases. In preparing the next edition of the AJCC staging system, consideration should be given to eliminating the stage IB designation and incorporating biologic factors.
© 2014 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25488970      PMCID: PMC4372850          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.2958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  30 in total

1.  American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Gary H Lyman; Armando E Giuliano; Mark R Somerfield; Al B Benson; Diane C Bodurka; Harold J Burstein; Alistair J Cochran; Hiram S Cody; Stephen B Edge; Sharon Galper; James A Hayman; Theodore Y Kim; Cheryl L Perkins; Donald A Podoloff; Visa Haran Sivasubramaniam; Roderick R Turner; Richard Wahl; Donald L Weaver; Antonio C Wolff; Eric P Winer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study.

Authors:  Lisa A Carey; Charles M Perou; Chad A Livasy; Lynn G Dressler; David Cowan; Kathleen Conway; Gamze Karaca; Melissa A Troester; Chiu Kit Tse; Sharon Edmiston; Sandra L Deming; Joseph Geradts; Maggie C U Cheang; Torsten O Nielsen; Patricia G Moorman; H Shelton Earp; Robert C Millikan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications.

Authors:  T Sørlie; C M Perou; R Tibshirani; T Aas; S Geisler; H Johnsen; T Hastie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; T Thorsen; H Quist; J C Matese; P O Brown; D Botstein; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Prognostic factors in breast cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999.

Authors:  P L Fitzgibbons; D L Page; D Weaver; A D Thor; D C Allred; G M Clark; S G Ruby; F O'Malley; J F Simpson; J L Connolly; D F Hayes; S B Edge; A Lichter; S J Schnitt
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.534

5.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours.

Authors:  C M Perou; T Sørlie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; C A Rees; J R Pollack; D T Ross; H Johnsen; L A Akslen; O Fluge; A Pergamenschikov; C Williams; S X Zhu; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-17       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy is accurate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  T M Breslin; L Cohen; A Sahin; J B Fleming; H M Kuerer; L A Newman; E S Delpassand; R House; F C Ames; B W Feig; M I Ross; S E Singletary; A U Buzdar; G N Hortobagyi; K K Hunt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Breast cancer subtype approximated by estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER-2 is associated with local and distant recurrence after breast-conserving therapy.

Authors:  Paul L Nguyen; Alphonse G Taghian; Matthew S Katz; Andrzej Niemierko; Rita F Abi Raad; Whitney L Boon; Jennifer R Bellon; Julia S Wong; Barbara L Smith; Jay R Harris
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Significance and management of micrometastases in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.512

9.  Validation of a breast cancer nomogram for predicting nonsentinel lymph node metastases after a positive sentinel node biopsy.

Authors:  Laura A Lambert; Gregory D Ayers; Rosa F Hwang; Kelly K Hunt; Merrick I Ross; Henry M Kuerer; S Eva Singletary; Gildy V Babiera; Frederick C Ames; Barry Feig; Anthony Lucci; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Funda Meric-Bernstam
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Combined use of clinical and pathologic staging variables to define outcomes for breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Jacqueline S Jeruss; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Susan L Tucker; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Thomas A Buchholz; Aysegul A Sahin; Janice N Cormier; Aman U Buzdar; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  11 in total

1.  Impact of Micrometastatic Axillary Nodes on Survival of Breast Cancer Patients with Tumors ≤2 cm.

Authors:  Hyeon Woo Bae; Kwang Hyun Yoon; Joo Heung Kim; Sung Mook Lim; Jee Ye Kim; Hyung Seok Park; Seho Park; Seung Il Kim; Young Up Cho; Byeong-Woo Park
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Inflammatory breast cancer: a proposed conceptual shift in the UICC-AJCC TNM staging system.

Authors:  Tamer M Fouad; Angelica M Gutierrez Barrera; James M Reuben; Anthony Lucci; Wendy A Woodward; Michael C Stauder; Bora Lim; Sarah M DeSnyder; Banu Arun; Babiera Gildy; Vicente Valero; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Naoto T Ueno
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Axillary Ultrasound Accurately Excludes Clinically Significant Lymph Node Disease in Patients With Early Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Natalia S Tucker; Amy E Cyr; Foluso O Ademuyiwa; Adel Tabchy; Krystl George; Piyush K Sharma; Linda X Jin; Souzan Sanati; Rebecca Aft; Feng Gao; Julie A Margenthaler; William E Gillanders
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Validation Study of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Eighth Edition Prognostic Stage Compared With the Anatomic Stage in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Anna Weiss; Mariana Chavez-MacGregor; Daphne Y Lichtensztajn; Min Yi; Audree Tadros; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Sharon H Giordano; Kelly K Hunt; Elizabeth A Mittendorf
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 31.777

5.  Trends in the Application of Postmastectomy Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer With 1 to 3 Positive Axillary Nodes and Tumors ≤5 cm in the Modern Treatment Era: A Retrospective Korean Breast Cancer Society Report.

Authors:  Jee Suk Chang; Jung Eun Choi; Min Ho Park; Sung Hoo Jung; Byung Ock Choi; Hyung Seok Park; Seho Park; Yong Bae Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Redefining radiotherapy for early-stage breast cancer with single dose ablative treatment: a study protocol.

Authors:  R K Charaghvandi; B van Asselen; M E P Philippens; H M Verkooijen; C H van Gils; P J van Diest; R M Pijnappel; M G G Hobbelink; A J Witkamp; T van Dalen; E van der Wall; T C van Heijst; R Koelemij; M van Vulpen; H J G D van den Bongard
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  A Seven-Long Non-coding RNA Signature Improves Prognosis Prediction of Lung Adenocarcinoma: An Integrated Competing Endogenous RNA Network Analysis.

Authors:  Rang Li; Kedong Han; Dehua Xu; Xiaolin Chen; Shujin Lan; Yuanjun Liao; Shengnan Sun; Shaoqi Rao
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  Influence of tumour stage at breast cancer detection on survival in modern times: population based study in 173,797 patients.

Authors:  Sepideh Saadatmand; Reini Bretveld; Sabine Siesling; Madeleine M A Tilanus-Linthorst
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-10-06

9.  Prognostic significance of CD117 expression and TP53 missense mutations in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Yanli Luo; Wentao Huang; Huizhen Zhang; Guang Liu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  Do Recent Advances in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Procedures Negate the Benefit of Postmastectomy Radiotherapy in N1 Patients With a Low Risk of Locoregional Recurrence?

Authors:  Jee Suk Chang; Jeongshim Lee; Kyung Hwan Kim; Joo Hyuk Sohn; Seung Il Kim; Byeong-Woo Park; Hyun Cheol Chung; Ki Chang Keum; Chang-Ok Suh; Yong Bae Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.