Literature DB >> 25488653

Imaging mass spectrometry for assessing cutaneous wound healing: analysis of pressure ulcers.

Domenico Taverna1, Alonda C Pollins, Giovanni Sindona, Richard M Caprioli, Lillian B Nanney.   

Abstract

Imaging mass spectrometry (IMS) was employed for the analysis of frozen skin biopsies to investigate the differences between stage IV pressure ulcers that remain stalled, stagnant, and unhealed versus those exhibiting clinical and histological signs of improvement. Our data reveal a rich diversity of proteins that are dynamically modulated, and we selectively highlight a family of calcium binding proteins (S-100 molecules) including calcyclin (S100-A6), calgranulins A (S100-A8) and B (S100-A9), and calgizzarin (S100-A11). IMS allowed us to target three discrete regions of interest: the wound bed, adjacent dermis, and hypertrophic epidermis. Plots derived using unsupervised principal component analysis of the global protein signatures within these three spatial niches indicate that these data from wound signatures have potential as a prognostic tool since they appear to delineate wounds that are favorably responding to therapeutic interventions versus those that remain stagnant or intractable in their healing status. Our discovery-based approach with IMS augments current knowledge of the molecular signatures within pressure ulcers while providing a rationale for a focused examination of the role of calcium modulators within the context of impaired wound healing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pressure ulcers; S-100 proteins; calcyclin; calgizzarin; calgranulin A; calgranulin B; chronic wounds; human defensin 6; imaging mass spectrometry; proteomics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25488653      PMCID: PMC4324443          DOI: 10.1021/pr5010218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


Introduction

Experimental procedures for large-scale global proteome analyses typically examine differential expression of hundreds of proteins between two or more biological states. In many cases, these proteins become potential biomarker candidates, and a select few may eventually move through the development pathway to become therapeutic targets. Proteomics is fundamentally reliant on the power of mass spectrometry (MS) for rapid and specific protein analysis. Mass spectrometric methodologies provide a rapid and sensitive tool for identification and quantitation of analytes[1,2] as well as for direct analysis of protein mixtures, with less emphasis on preliminary protein purification steps.[3,4] A subset within this field of study is MALDI imaging MS (MALDI IMS),[5] a consolidated tool for the analysis of biological and clinical tissue samples[6] that has become an enabling technology in biological and medical research fields.[7−10] Applications of MALDI IMS include analysis of proteins,[11−13] peptides (both endogenous and enzymatically produced),[14−17] lipids,[18−20] drugs and metabolites,[21,22] and oligonucleotides.[23] Endogenous as well as exogenous molecules can be analyzed directly from the tissue in their native environment, providing new insights into the biological process involved. Direct analysis on intact tissue preserves the spatial relationship of molecules within a specimen while requiring minimal sample preparation. Thin tissue sections (typically, 5–12 μm thick) are obtained from fresh frozen or formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues and collected onto conductive targets. A matrix compound (typically, a small organic acid as well as a proteolytic enzyme when necessary) is deposited onto the surface of a tissue sample in one of a few different ways (e.g., by spotting, subliming, or spraying). The target is analyzed by the mass spectrometer. Mass spectra are subsequently produced through laser ablation of a multitude of spots or pixels located on the sample. Intensity plots, or images, are constructed for each m/z value by plotting intensities in two-dimensional spaces, resulting in hundreds of images (ion density maps) being recorded in a single MALDI IMS experiment. The present study was designed to inform the field of impaired wound healing, where molecular mechanisms are poorly defined, through the utilization of the enabling technology of MALDI IMS as a discovery tool. Among the three major categories of chronic wounds, pressure ulcers were selected for analysis since this type of ulcer has recently come under closer scrutiny as an indicator of quality control in acute and long-term care facilities as reimbursement rules have become more stringent for those patients who acquire an ulcer during their hospital stay. The current economic climate thus offers a strong impetus to reduce the occurrence of pressure ulcers, to better understand the molecular disturbances in the wounds, and then to design more effective treatments. Clearly, a diagnostic tool and better understanding of the molecular disturbances within a wound bed would advance the field. A pressure ulcer is a localized injury to the skin and underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence as a result of pressure or pressure in combination with shear and friction.[24] In current clinical practice, modern prognostic tools have not been applied to this disease. Bedside assessment of pressure ulcers is based on categorization into six visual stages, and accurate staging is wholly dependent on the experience of the healthcare provider.[25] The clinical determination of whether a wound is responding to the treatment of choice is based solely on subjective visual appearance of the wound, as objective measures have not been established. While a number of contributing or confounding factors, such as pre-existing medical conditions and socio-economic factors, are strongly associated with pressure ulcers, the significance of these factors in the development of a pressure ulcer is yet to be elucidated.[26,27] In recognition that millions of patients on a worldwide basis are afflicted with chronic wounds that impose physical, psychosocial, and economic stresses to patients and burden society,[28] investigators have recently turned their attention toward elucidating proteomic changes occurring within pressure ulcers. The earliest proteomic reports analyzed wound fluids to provide the first glimpse of molecular events within chronic pressure ulcers.[29] In 2011, our group reported our initial studies using IMS to assess the distribution of proteins and lipids within skin ulcer tissue sections as compared to discrete areas within normal skin.[30,31] The present IMS study was designed to extend our earlier proteomic findings using stage IV pressure ulcers. Although we report global proteomic disturbances, we selectively describe the spatial distribution of calcium binding proteins collected from ulcers displaying clinical evidence of continued chronicity in contrast to those showing clinical and morphologic evidence of healing. Some samples also displayed an intermediate stage of healing, depicting a possible shift in the wound response. Our study suggests that protein signatures may eventually serve as useful indicators to address whether chronic wounds remain stalled and stagnant or whether they are responding appropriately to therapeutic intervention and showing positive progression toward healing.

Experimental Section

Tissue Specimen Collection and Processing

Samples (n = 15) were obtained from patients on the Plastic Surgery Service undergoing surgical excision of large stage IV pressure ulcers prior to coverage with a local skin flap. To maintain a degree of standardization among these wound types, sample collection was restricted to the edge of the wound. The surgeon was queried for his subjective impressions as to whether that portion of the wound was showing evidence of improvement or was stagnant. Consent was obtained to use these discarded specimens for research purposes in accordance with Vanderbilt’s Institutional Review Board. Samples were wrapped in aluminum foil, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen, and then stored at −80 °C. Adjacent companion samples for histological analysis were collected in 10% neutral buffered formalin (10% NBF), fixed for 24–48 h, and paraffin embedded.

Tissue Preparation and IMS Analysis

Frozen tissues were sectioned at 12 μm using a cryostat (CM3050 S, Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) and fixed on ITO conductive glass slides while serial sections were collected on microscope slides for hematoxylin and eosin staining.[31] Tissue sections were gently washed prior to matrix deposition for MALDI analysis to remove salts, lipids, and general contaminants using a series of solutions (ethanol 70%, 30 s; ethanol 95%, 30 s; Carnoy’s fluid, 120 s; ethanol 100%, 30 s; water, 30 s; ethanol 100%, 30 s) and were allowed to dry for 3 min at room temperature. For imaging experiments, sections were coated with a thin homogeneous layer of matrix using a sublimation device (Chemglass Life Science, Vineland, NJ, USA). Sublimation of sinapinic acid (300 mg) was carried out at 138 °C, at a pressure of 50 mTorr. After 17 min, ITO slides with the tissue on the upper surface became uniformly coated with a thin matrix layer. Finally, tissue sections were rehydrated at 85 °C for 3 min to allow matrix recrystallization. MS analysis were performed by a AutoflexSpeed MALDI TOF spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA), equipped with a linear TOF analyzer, operating in positive polarity and accumulating 100 laser shots per position at 1000 Hz laser frequency over the m/z range of 2500–30 000. The laser intensity was adjusted before each experiment to yield optimal results. Images were acquired by a rastering pattern at 50 and 100 μm spatial resolution. Flex Control 3.3 software (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA) was used for spectra acquisition, and Flex Imaging 3.0, for image acquisition and ion density two-dimensional plots generation. Prior to generation of ion density maps, acquired spectra were normalized to the total ion current (TIC) in order to minimize spectrum-to-spectrum differences in peak intensity.

Statistical Analysis

Multiple spectra within the three regions of interest (wound bed, adjacent dermis, and hypertrophic epidermis at the wound margin) were selected from the MALDI IMS data. In particular, 200 spectra per area of interest were exported using the ion density maps of specific molecular features as coordinates. Comparisons of these regions of interest within different healing conditions were made using principal component analysis (PCA) based on protein profile patterns. These data were used to confirm the existence of three disparate regions within the wound tissues according to the protein pattern differences. Furthermore, data sets were processed using ClinProTools 2.2 software (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA): spectra were selected (100 maximal peak number, S/N threshold set at 5) and sorted by p-value (Wilcoxon/Kruskal–Wallis), and baselines were subtracted using Top Hat and recalibrated. PCA analyses were run after TIC spectra normalization.

In Situ Digestion, LC Analysis, and Protein ID

In situ digestion was carried out using spots of hydrogel (1 mm diameter) adapting a method described by Harris et al.[32,33] Briefly, hydrogels were rehydrated and expanded in 20 μL of 1 μg/mL trypsin (in 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate) and then placed on the tissue regions of interest according to the histology. The frozen sections, with hydrogels in place, were incubated at 50 °C, allowing digestion. After 4 h, hydrogels were removed from the tissue sections and collected individually. After the digestion, peptides were extracted by organic (50% acetonitrile/5% formic acid) and aqueous (100 mM ammonium bicarbonate) solvents (process repeated three times). The supernatants of each extraction were combined and dried in a centrifugal vacuum concentrator (SPD Speedvac, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The reconstituted extracts (20 μL, 0.1% formic acid) were stored at −80 °C until LC–MS/MS analysis. Resulting peptides were analyzed by a 70 min data-dependent LC–MS/MS analysis. Briefly, peptides were loaded via pressure cell onto a 40 mm × 0.1 mm self-packed reversed-phase (Jupiter 5 μm, 300A Phenomonex) trapping column fritted into an M520 filter union (IDEX). After loading and equilibration, this trapping column was attached to a 200 mm × 0.1 mm (Jupiter 3 μm, 300A), self-packed analytical column coupled directly to an LTQ (ThermoFisher, San Jose, CA, USA) using a nanoelectrospray source. A series of a full-scan mass spectrum followed by five data-dependent tandem mass spectra (MS/MS) were collected using the run-and-dynamic exclusion feature that was enabled to minimize acquisition of redundant spectra. MS/MS spectra were searched via SEQUEST against a human database (UniProtKB reference proteome set) that also contained reversed versions for each of the entries and considering all of the SEQUEST peptides scores for the level of confidence of protein identification.[34] Identifications were filtered to two peptides per protein and 0% peptide false discovery rate and collated at the protein level using Scaffold (Proteome Software). Furthermore, MS/MS spectrum searches were performed with a tolerance of 2.5 Da (monoisotopic) and fragment ion tolerance of 0.5 Da (monoisotopic). Search criteria also included up to 10 missed cleavages, peptide threshold 95% (minimum), protein threshold 99.9% (minimum), and variable modifications, such as methionine (M) and histidine (H) oxidation and also (N-term) acetylation.

Results and Discussion

Imaging Mass Spectrometry

IMS was used to assess spatial localization of proteins within focal areas of human pressure ulcer tissue sections. Currently, in the absence of validated tools, clinicians rely on subjective visual observations at the bedside to provide guidance. Our study included samples removed from stage IV pressure ulcers under various conditions ranging from stagnant, intractable sores to those showing nascent evidence of improvement. Attention was focused within three regions of interest: the wound bed, adjacent dermis, and hypertrophic epidermis at the wound’s edge. Among the discovery data set, we discovered multiple proteins within a family of calcium-modulated proteins such as calcyclin (S100-A6), calgranulin A (S100-A8) and B (S100-A9), and calgizzarin (S100-A11), displaying uniquely different localizations in pressure ulcer samples under different healing conditions. The S100 proteins identified are uniquely expressed in vertebrates[35] and have been implicated to date in a variety of cellular activities including signal transduction, cell differentiation, regulation of cell motility, transcription and regeneration in mouse ear wounds.[35−37] Figure 1 displays a series of two-dimensional ion density maps for human defensin 6 (HD-6), calcyclin, calgranulin A, calgizzarin, and calgranulin B. These ion density maps are plotted for three representative pressure ulcer samples from different patients (Table 1), highlighting chronically stagnant, unmistakable healing, and also intermediate or modest healing states. In our earlier publication, we documented that several members of the human defensin family (HNP-1, -2, -3) were differentially expressed in the wound beds exhibiting little or no evidence of healing. In this article, we extend these findings to include the ion at m/z 3708, human defensin 6 (HD-6). This molecule was strictly localized to the wound bed in both the chronic, stagnant wound beds and in the intermediate (modestly healing) samples, whereas it was poorly expressed in the healing sample, where it showed no particular localization. This report extends our earlier impressions that defensins may serve as markers for wounds that are struggling to overcome the prevailing factors that are responsible for wound chronicity.
Figure 1

Two-dimensional ion density maps for human defensin 6 (HD-6) and 4 calcium related proteins: calcyclin, calgranulin A, calgizzarin, and calgranulin B. The left column (W) shows histological staining for three types of chronic pressure ulcers: a chronic (stagnating) example, a wound showing modest evidence of healing (intermediate along the healing continuum), and an ulcer that is definitely improving. Dotted lines divide the wound into focal regions of interest. Those above or to the left were sampled as wound bed, and areas to the right or below were sampled as nearby adjacent dermis. The color bar indicates the relative intensity of the particular ion, with red/pink colors representing the highest values and the blue/purple/black representing areas of low or nondetectable values.

Table 1

Patient Demographics

patientagesexracea
169FC
218MC
341MC
426MC
537MC
637FC
747MC
864MC
939FC
1019MC
1173FC
1238MC
1347MC
1419MAA
1542FAA

C, Caucasian; AA, African American.

Two-dimensional ion density maps for human defensin 6 (HD-6) and 4 calcium related proteins: calcyclin, calgranulin A, calgizzarin, and calgranulin B. The left column (W) shows histological staining for three types of chronic pressure ulcers: a chronic (stagnating) example, a wound showing modest evidence of healing (intermediate along the healing continuum), and an ulcer that is definitely improving. Dotted lines divide the wound into focal regions of interest. Those above or to the left were sampled as wound bed, and areas to the right or below were sampled as nearby adjacent dermis. The color bar indicates the relative intensity of the particular ion, with red/pink colors representing the highest values and the blue/purple/black representing areas of low or nondetectable values. C, Caucasian; AA, African American. Figure 1 shows that calcyclin, the ion at m/z 10 093, was distributed into the adjacent dermis in the case of the chronic (nonhealing) sample as well as into the hypertrophic epidermis in the case of the healing sample. Furthermore, the same protein expression in the intermediate healing sample highlights a different localization in the papillary (upper) dermis, close to the wound bed. Recently, calcyclin has been associated with the mechanism of promoting colorectal cancer metastasis[38] and, when underexpressed, with small cell lung cancer,[39,40] but it has little or no prior association with the events of wound healing. Two other calcium binding proteins, calgranulin A and B, respectively at m/z 10 834 and 13 150, displayed a unique localization pattern within the pressure ulcers regions. Both proteins were restricted to the wound bed in the chronic (nonhealing) condition, but in the samples with robust healing, they were localized only in the hypertrophic epidermis close to the wound bed. The intermediate healing condition displayed these proteins in both the hypertrophic epidermis and throughout the wound bed. Thus, these two calcium-dependent molecules show a dynamic modulation, providing indirect clues that they play a heretofore undefined role in injury and repair. Often, calgranulin A and B, recently reviewed by Moore et al.,[41] are found to be aggregated into a complex known as calprotectin. This configuration has been shown to enhance neutrophil migration to inflammatory sites in a murine model and IMS has been used to detect heterodimer subunits of calprotectin as a marker of the inflammatory response to bacterial challenge.[42] Mounting evidence suggests that calgranulins function in anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial roles.[43] They have been identified in numerous inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, chronic periodontal disease, connective tissue disease, psoriasis, and bacterial pulmonary infection.[41,44−46] In addition, these proteins are involved in wound repair and reorganization of keratinocyte resistance to bacteria[43] and are increased following epidermal injury.[36,47] Eming et al. have reported elevated calgranulin B in wound exudates.[48] Our discovery of calgranulin A and B in chronic wound tissues should provide additional impetus to examine the role of calcium-dependent reactions during the reparative process. At a minimum, these data suggest that the presence of calgranulins A and B indicates a wound that is still largely characterized as being predominantly in the inflammatory phase. Another member of the calcium binding family, the ion at m/z 11 656, calgizzarin, also displayed changes in localization among different healing conditions. The chronic, stagnant wound sample regionally displayed this protein in the wound bed but also throughout the adjacent dermis, similar to the calcyclin distribution. By contrast, the healing sample displayed calgizzarin with a relatively high expression into the hypertrophic epidermis, similar to the calgranulin A and B distributions. The intermediate healing state presented an unrestricted distribution throughout both the epidermis and the papillary dermis. The differential distribution pattern for calgizzarin within various stages and focal areas of interest was not surprising. Differential expression of calgizzarin has been previously reported and used to distinguish colorectal carcinoma from colon adenoma,[49] a setting where there is also rapid growth and transition of tissue morphology. These protein localization trends were consistently obvious in the other samples examined in this study (see Supporting Information Figure 1). Table 2 provides localization information for the calcium binding molecules of note with each of the 15 patient samples, as well as that of several nonmodulated constitutive proteins.
Table 2

Localization of Proteins of Note within Each Patient Samplea

patienthuman defensin-6 m/z 3708thymosin beta-10 m/z 4736thymosin beta-4 trunc. m/z 4748calcyclin m/z 10 093calgranulin A m/z 10 834calgizzarin m/z 11 656calgranulin B m/z 13 150
1WDDDW, ED, EW, E
2WDDDED, EE
3WNLDDNLD, lower WW
4WNLNLDWDW
5W, lowDDNLEEE
6W, lowDDDWD, WW
7D, lowE, lowE, lowENLEE, low
8W, lowDDDWEE
9NLDD, restrictedEEEE
10NLD, EDDED, EE
11WD, WD, WDW, ED, upperE
12NLNLNLD, EEEE
13WD, ED, ENLD, upperEE
14Wlower Dlower DD, EW, EEE
15WD, lowD, lowDW, E, D upperD, EE

W, wound bed; D, adjacent dermis; E, hypertrophic epidermis; and NL, not localized (undetectable). A distribution restricted to the upper dermis (upper), lower dermis (lower). Low indicates a relatively low, but detectable level.

W, wound bed; D, adjacent dermis; E, hypertrophic epidermis; and NL, not localized (undetectable). A distribution restricted to the upper dermis (upper), lower dermis (lower). Low indicates a relatively low, but detectable level.

Spectral Profiling

Spectra highlighting the distribution of specific proteins within the regions of interest were exported from the imaging data sets from all of the samples using guidance from hematoxylin and eosin stained serial tissue sections, and the coordinates were provided by the ion density maps. Figure 2 shows the averaged spectra, normalized to the TIC, recorded from all of the chronic (stagnant), intermediate (modest or nascent) healing, and the firmly established healing samples. Spectra were plotted into the mass range 10–15 kDa, focusing on calcium binding proteins within that mass range. However, additional spectra were acquired in the mass range 3–30 kDa (see Supporting Information Figure 2). In general, all of the averaged spectra from chronic (stagnant) wound examples highlighted signals related to calcyclin, calgranulin A and B, and calgizzarin. Spectra profiled from the definitively healing wound examples instead displayed mainly calcyclin and calgranulin A. However, calgranulin A had a relatively low expression overall in these wounds. In summary, the averaged spectra from the chronic (stagnant) samples always displayed calcium binding protein signals, whereas the averaged spectra from the wounds in the healing phases displayed a predominant expression of calcyclin and a relatively low, yet specific, expression of calgranulin A. Interestingly, spectra for calgranulin A display a similar pattern as that of HD-6, as both molecules are present in chronic (stagnant) wound beds but not in those that were well on their way toward healing. In addition, calgranulin A is not detectable in the adjacent dermis of intermediate and healing wounds. Calgranulin A appeared to be restricted to the hypertrophic epidermis of the healing wounds (see Supporting Information Figure 3). Spectra recorded from wounds in the intermediate healing condition displayed a protein pattern similar to that of the chronic state but with different relative expression levels. Interestingly, the signal representing calcyclin was not detected in the spectra averaged from the chronic (stagnant) wound beds but was present in both the intermediate and healing wound beds.
Figure 2

Averaged spectra from all of the samples included in the study. The x axis is truncated to show peaks for calcium binding molecules in the molecular weight range of 10–15 kDa. The y axis is expressed in arbitrary units but is held constant within each focal area (wound bed, adjacent dermis, hypertrophic epidermis). Each row reveals that each focal area has a unique footprint of spectral values.

Averaged spectra from all of the samples included in the study. The x axis is truncated to show peaks for calcium binding molecules in the molecular weight range of 10–15 kDa. The y axis is expressed in arbitrary units but is held constant within each focal area (wound bed, adjacent dermis, hypertrophic epidermis). Each row reveals that each focal area has a unique footprint of spectral values. Table 3 provides a listing of identified proteins with the corresponding accession numbers, molecular weight, and number of assigned spectra and unique identified peptides from different skin tissue regions, wound bed and adjacent dermis. Table 4, instead, provides a listing of identified proteins from wounds with a chronic or healing status and displays whether they were detected in the wound bed, adjacent dermis, or both. Interestingly, many proteins on this list are uniquely identified within chronic (stagnant) wounds, and the majority of those are isolated to a specific region of interest. While our report predominantly highlights the theme of calcium-modulating proteins, our discovery approach indicates a much broader, rich field of molecules for future exploration. All of the information related to the level of confidence of the protein identification, such as protein identification probability, percentage of sequence coverage, peptide sequences, and related scores, are reported as Supporting Information (Tables 1 and 2).
Table 3

A Selection of Protein IDs and the Corresponding Numbers of Peptides and Spectra

   no. of unique peptides
no. of assigned spectra
protein nameaccession no.molecular weight (Da)woundadjcent dermiswoundadjacent dermis
78 kDa glucose-regulated proteinP1102172 3354343
Actin, aortic smooth muscleP6273642012526
Actin, cytoplasmic 1P6070941 79312101615
Alpha-1-antitrypsinP0100946 7376869
Alpha-2-macroglobulinP01023163 2894646
Alpha-actinin-4O43707104 8570404
Alpha-enolaseP0673347 1705161
Annexin A1P0408338 7152333
Annexin A5P0875835 9380303
Annexin A6P0813375 8773333
Apolipoprotein A-IP0264730 7782424
CaldesmonQ0568261 7063333
Cofilin-1P2352818 5033040
Collagen alpha-1(I) chainP02452138 94110271044
Collagen alpha-1(III) chainP0246113 856615621
Collagen alpha-1(VI) chainP12109108 5311416
Collagen alpha-1(XII) chainQ99715333 1453131
Collagen alpha-1(XIV) chainQ05707193 5160707
Collagen alpha-2(I) chainP08123129 31510251032
Collagen alpha-2(VI) chainP12110108 58129212
Collagen alpha-3(VI) chainP12111343 667628834
Complement C3P01024187 149710813
Complement C4-AP0C0L4192 7732323
DesminP1766153 5370404
ElastinP1550226 1770304
Elongation factor 1-alpha 1P6810450 1410303
Fibrinogen alpha chainP0267194 973104116
Fibrinogen beta chainP0267555 9291591910
Fibrinogen gamma chainP0267951 51386118
FibronectinP02751262 6174242
Filamin-AP21333280 7291414
GelsolinP0639685 6983141
Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenaseP0440636 0533434
HaptoglobinP0073845 2055555
Heat shock 70 kDa protein 1A/1BP0810770 0541515
Heat shock protein HSP 90-alphaP0790084 6631314
Hemoglobin subunit alphaP6990515 2585374
Hemoglobin subunit betaP6887115 9985559
Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein KP6197850 9791313
Histone H1.4P1041221 8674141
Histone H4P6280511 3681313
Human defensin alpha 6Q0152410 9752040
Ig alpha-1 chain C regionP0187637 6543434
Ig gamma-1 chain C regionP0185736 1054252
Ig gamma-2 chain C regionP0185935 8993151
Ig kappa chain C regionP0183411 6093334
keratin 1, type II, cytoskeletalgi742871265 4950214
LumicanP5188438 4320505
MoesinP2603867 8222323
Myosin light polypeptide 6P6066017 0893232
Myosin-9P35579226 538169179
Neuroblast differentiation-associated proteinQ09666629 1041919
Peptidyl-prolyl cis–trans isomerase AP6293718 0130404
Plasma protease C1 inhibitorP0515549 7582323
Plastin-2P1379670 2917272
PlectinQ15149531 7840303
Prelamin-A/CP0254574 1411617
Protein S100-A11, calgizzarinP3194911 7402342
Protein S100-A6, calcyclinP0670310 1802266
Protein S100-A8, calgranulin AP0510910 8353262
Protein S100-A9, calgranulin BP0670213 2423252
Pyruvate kinase isozymes M1/M2P1461857 9383434
Serum albuminP0276869 36713151723
Talin-1Q9Y490269 7654141
TransgelinQ0199522 6113434
Tropomyosin alpha-4 chainP6793628 5220303
Tubulin alpha-1B chainP6836346 2982434
Tubulin beta chainP0743748 4614040
VimentinP0867053 65313131413
VitronectinP0400454 3061313
Table 4

Locations of Identified Proteins

protein nameaccession no.chronichealingbothwound bedadjacent dermisboth
78 kDa glucose-regulated proteinP11021×    ×
Actin, aortic smooth muscleP62736×   × 
Actin, cytoplasmic 1P60709  ×  ×
Alpha-1-antitrypsinP01009  ×  ×
Alpha-2-macroglobulinP01023  ×  ×
Alpha-actinin-4O43707×   × 
Alpha-enolaseP06733  ××  
Annexin A1P04083×   × 
Annexin A5P08758×   × 
Annexin A6P08133×    ×
Apolipoprotein A-IP02647 ×  × 
CaldesmonQ05682×    ×
Cofilin-1P23528  ××  
Collagen alpha-1(I) chainP02452  ×  ×
Collagen alpha-1(III) chainP02461  ×  ×
Collagen alpha-1(VI) chainP12109  × × 
Collagen alpha-1(XII) chainQ99715×  ×  
Collagen alpha-1(XIV) chainQ05707  × × 
Collagen alpha-2(I) chainP08123 ×   ×
Collagen alpha-2(VI) chainP12110  × × 
Collagen alpha-3(VI) chainP12111  ×  ×
Complement C3P01024  ×  ×
Complement C4-AP0C0L4×   × 
DesminP17661×   × 
ElastinP15502  × × 
Elongation factor 1-alpha 1P68104×   × 
Fibrinogen alpha chainP02671  ×  ×
Fibrinogen beta chainP02675  ×  ×
Fibrinogen gamma chainP02679  ×  ×
FibronectinP02751  ××  
Filamin-AP21333×   × 
GelsolinP06396  ××  
Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenaseP04406  ×  ×
HaptoglobinP00738  ×  ×
Heat shock 70 kDa protein 1A/1BP08107×   × 
Heat shock protein HSP 90-alphaP07900×   × 
Hemoglobin subunit alphaP69905  ×  ×
Hemoglobin subunit betaP68871  ×  ×
Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein KP61978×    ×
Histone H1.4P10412×  ×  
Histone H4P62805×   × 
Human defensin alpha 6Q01524×  ×  
Ig alpha-1 chain C regionP01876  ×  ×
Ig gamma-1 chain C regionP01857  ××  
Ig gamma-2 chain C regionP01859  ××  
Ig kappa chain C regionP01834  ×  ×
keratin 1, type II, cytoskeletalgi7428712  × × 
LumicanP51884  × × 
MoesinP26038  × × 
Myosin light polypeptide 6P60660×  ×  
Myosin-9P35579×    ×
Neuroblast differentiation-associated proteinQ09666×   × 
Peptidyl-prolyl cis–trans isomerase AP62937  × × 
Plasma protease C1 inhibitorP05155×   × 
Plastin-2P13796  ××  
PlectinQ15149×   × 
Prelamin-A/CP02545×   × 
Protein S100-A11, calgizzarinP31949  × × 
Protein S100-A6, calcyclinP06703  ×  ×
Protein S100-A8, calgranulin AP05109  ××  
Protein S100-A9, calgranulin BP06702  ××  
Pyruvate kinase isozymes M1/M2P14618  ×  ×
Serum albuminP02768  ×  ×
Talin-1Q9Y490×  ×  
TransgelinQ01995 ×   ×
Tropomyosin alpha-4 chainP67936  × × 
Tubulin alpha-1B chainP68363×   × 
Tubulin beta chainP07437×  ×  
VimentinP08670  ×  ×
VitronectinP04004  × × 

Principal Component Analysis

Imaging data sets were also subjected to principal component analysis (PCA) to validate the changes in protein patterns/trends within different healing conditions. Figure 3a displays three PCA plots, where spectra from each region of interest were compared to each other in the three healing conditions. These statistical approaches generated distinct spectra clusters based on condition or region within the cohort. In the case of chronic (stagnant) samples, spectra clusters from wound bed, adjacent dermis, and hypertrophic epidermis were widely separated from each other. In the samples displaying morphological and clinical evidence of robust healing, spectra clusters from the wound bed and the adjacent dermis areas overlapped, whereas spectra from the hypertrophic epidermis clustered separately. This latter finding suggests that in circumstance of robust and definitive healing the protein patterns from the two neighboring tissue areas (wound bed and the adjacent dermis) are more similar than those in the circumstance of chronic, stagnant wounds, where the wound regions highlighted a different protein pattern. Furthermore, spectra sets from the hypertrophic epidermis always displayed separately within the PCA plots regardless of healing condition. This was expected since epidermis and dermis consist of entirely different cell populations and thus serve as an internal validation tool of our processes. Samples showing evidence of healing in the intermediate phases, similar to the samples displaying chronic (stagnant) wounds, showed all three regional spectra clusters differentially distributed within the PCA plot, although in this group the three unique clusters plotted closer to each other than in the chronic condition.
Figure 3

Principal component analysis data depicting the bulk of the proteins that were detected by IMS in the 3–30 kDa range. All of the pressure ulcers are included: chronic (stagnant) wounds, wounds with an intermediate (modest) improvement in healing, and wounds that exhibits excellent healing progression. Focal areas of interest include the wound bed and the adjacent dermis with its overlying hypertrophic epidermis.

Principal component analysis data depicting the bulk of the proteins that were detected by IMS in the 3–30 kDa range. All of the pressure ulcers are included: chronic (stagnant) wounds, wounds with an intermediate (modest) improvement in healing, and wounds that exhibits excellent healing progression. Focal areas of interest include the wound bed and the adjacent dermis with its overlying hypertrophic epidermis. Figure 3b displays a different representation of the same data in three additional PCA plots: comparing spectra data sets from different healing conditions (chronic, intermediate, and healing) within the regions of interest. Wound bed spectra sets were clustered and separated within the PCA plot with some overlap between chronic and intermediate wound beds, whereas spectra from healing wound beds clustered separately. In the case of hypertrophic epidermis and adjacent dermis, both the chronic and the intermediate spectra clusters, although close, were distinctly different in distribution, whereas the spectra from the healing samples continued to show a more varied distribution.

Conclusions

Imaging mass spectrometry can provide swift information on both the distribution and relative amounts of biocompounds within a thin tissue section.[7,10,50−52] In our study, IMS uncovered differential protein distributions in three different tissue niches within pressure wounds. This demonstrated that this technique can yield new clues with relative expression and spatial localization that have not been previously identified through traditional histology staining or analysis of wound fluids. Cell and tissue specific molecular profiles and images in correlation with tradition histology show promise as diagnostic tools of higher specificity and sensitivity to complement classical visual approaches by clinicians. In this study, our attention was focused on a set of calcium binding proteins from the S100 family and their distribution and localization within pressure ulcer wound beds and adjacent areas. Such proteins are usually expressed by circulating neutrophils and monocytes representing the first cells to invade inflammatory lesions.[53−55] In particular, calgranulin A and B have a cytotoxic effect that may play a role in several inflammatory diseases which are associated with endothelial dysfunction and pathologic accumulation of such proteins.[56] Furthermore, it was reported that S100 A8 and A9 form a hetero-oligomer called calprotectin, which plays a prominent role in the regulation of inflammatory processes and immune response.[57,58] Finally, this protein was recently also recognized as a novel player in wound repair after skin injury.[47] In summary, the molecular signatures within the pressure ulcer appear to change dynamically in response to environmental pressures and subsequent signaling, all of which are events that are still poorly characterized. We have elucidated a pattern of calcium binding proteins within the pressure ulcer model that can potentially be used for healing prediction and possible mitigation of unfavorable outcomes.
  56 in total

1.  Direct analysis of drug candidates in tissue by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Michelle L Reyzer; Yunsheng Hsieh; Kwokei Ng; Walter A Korfmacher; Richard M Caprioli
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.982

2.  ANTI-INFECTIVE PROTECTIVE PROPERTIES OF S100 CALGRANULINS.

Authors:  Kenneth Hsu; Chantrakorn Champaiboon; Brian D Guenther; Brent S Sorenson; Ali Khammanivong; Karen F Ross; Carolyn L Geczy; Mark C Herzberg
Journal:  Antiinflamm Antiallergy Agents Med Chem       Date:  2009-12-04

3.  Different expression of calgizzarin (S100A11) in normal colonic epithelium, adenoma and colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Christian Melle; Günther Ernst; Bettina Schimmel; Annett Bleul; Henning Mothes; Roland Kaufmann; Utz Settmacher; Ferdinand Von Eggeling
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.650

4.  The crystal structure of the human (S100A8/S100A9)2 heterotetramer, calprotectin, illustrates how conformational changes of interacting alpha-helices can determine specific association of two EF-hand proteins.

Authors:  Ingo P Korndörfer; Florian Brueckner; Arne Skerra
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Antimicrobial actions of calcium binding leucocyte L1 protein, calprotectin.

Authors:  M Steinbakk; C F Naess-Andresen; E Lingaas; I Dale; P Brandtzaeg; M K Fagerhol
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-09-29       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Two calcium-binding proteins associated with specific stages of myeloid cell differentiation are expressed by subsets of macrophages in inflammatory tissues.

Authors:  G Zwadlo; J Brüggen; G Gerhards; R Schlegel; C Sorg
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry reveals decreased calcylcin expression in small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Hee Seok Lee; Jun Won Park; Oleg Chertov; Simona Colantonio; John T Simpson; Matthew J Fivash; Chong Woo Yoo; Geon Kook Lee; Jae Ill Zo; Heung Tae Kim; Hark Kyun Kim
Journal:  Pathol Int       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.534

8.  Human skin wounds: a major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy.

Authors:  Chandan K Sen; Gayle M Gordillo; Sashwati Roy; Robert Kirsner; Lynn Lambert; Thomas K Hunt; Finn Gottrup; Geoffrey C Gurtner; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.617

9.  Molecular imaging of proteins in tissues by mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Erin H Seeley; Richard M Caprioli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Imaging mass spectrometry for assessing temporal proteomics: analysis of calprotectin in Acinetobacter baumannii pulmonary infection.

Authors:  Jessica L Moore; Kyle W Becker; Joshua J Nicklay; Kelli L Boyd; Eric P Skaar; Richard M Caprioli
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.984

View more
  10 in total

1.  Mapping and Identification of Native Proteins of Developing Teeth in Mouse Mandibles.

Authors:  Madeline Colley; Sitai Liang; Chunyan Tan; Kyle P Trobough; Stephan B H Bach; Yong-Hee Patricia Chun
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 2.  Molecular Aspects of Wound Healing and the Rise of Venous Leg Ulceration: Omics Approaches to Enhance Knowledge and Aid Diagnostic Discovery.

Authors:  Daniel A Broszczak; Elizabeth R Sydes; Daniel Wallace; Tony J Parker
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2017-02

3.  Oral administration of a recombinant cholera toxin B subunit promotes mucosal healing in the colon.

Authors:  K J Baldauf; J M Royal; J C Kouokam; B Haribabu; V R Jala; K Yaddanapudi; K T Hamorsky; G W Dryden; N Matoba
Journal:  Mucosal Immunol       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 7.313

4.  In vivo therapeutic efficacy of Curcuma longa extract loaded ethosomes on wound healing.

Authors:  Sumit Kumar; Akhilesh Kumar; Naveen Kumar; Praveen Singh; Thakur Uttam Singh; Bhoj Raj Singh; Piyush Kumar Gupta; Vijay Kumar Thakur
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 2.459

Review 5.  Mass Spectrometry Imaging: A Review of Emerging Advancements and Future Insights.

Authors:  Amanda Rae Buchberger; Kellen DeLaney; Jillian Johnson; Lingjun Li
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Histology-guided protein digestion/extraction from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded pressure ulcer biopsies.

Authors:  Domenico Taverna; Alonda C Pollins; Lillian B Nanney; Giovanni Sindona; Richard M Caprioli
Journal:  Exp Dermatol       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.960

Review 7.  Therapeutic Potential of Cholera Toxin B Subunit for the Treatment of Inflammatory Diseases of the Mucosa.

Authors:  Joshua M Royal; Nobuyuki Matoba
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 4.546

8.  IL-33-Dependent Group 2 Innate Lymphoid Cells Promote Cutaneous Wound Healing.

Authors:  Gregory D Rak; Lisa C Osborne; Mark C Siracusa; Brian S Kim; Kelvin Wang; Ardeshir Bayat; David Artis; Susan W Volk
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 8.551

9.  Reverse diauxie phenotype in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm revealed by exometabolomics and label-free proteomics.

Authors:  Yeni P Yung; S Lee McGill; Hui Chen; Heejoon Park; Ross P Carlson; Luke Hanley
Journal:  NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 7.290

10.  Comprehensive Proteomic Profiling of Pressure Ulcers in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury Identifies a Specific Protein Pattern of Pathology.

Authors:  Montserrat Baldan-Martin; Tatiana Martin-Rojas; Nerea Corbacho-Alonso; Juan Antonio Lopez; Tamara Sastre-Oliva; Felix Gil-Dones; Jesus Vazquez; Jose Manuel Arevalo; Laura Mourino-Alvarez; Maria G Barderas
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 4.730

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.