| Literature DB >> 25488126 |
Ersan Çiçek1, Mustafa Murat Koçak, Baran Can Sağlam, Sibel Koçak.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the dentinal microcrack formation of ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, and WaveOne. Sixty extracted mandibular molars were selected. The mesial roots were resected and randomly divided into four groups (n = 15). The canals were prepared with hand files (group 1), ProTaper Universal (group 2), ProTaper Next (group 3), and WaveOne (group 4) instrument systems. The roots were separated horizontally at 3, 6, and 9 mm from the apex. Digital images were captured at ×40 magnification using scanning electron microscopy to detect microcrack formation. Statistical analysis was performed by Pearson Chi-square test. The prevalence of microcracks in group 2, group 3, and group 4 were significantly higher when compared to group 1 (p < 0.001). Group 2, group 3, and group 4 demonstrated similar prevalence of microcracks without significant difference (p > 0.05) in all sections. All instruments caused microcracks except for hand file. The highest percentage of microcrack was recorded in 3 mm section for all groups. © Wiley Periodicals, Inc.Keywords: Instrumentation; NiTi File; microcrack; root dentin; scanning electron microscope
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25488126 DOI: 10.1002/sca.21178
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Scanning ISSN: 0161-0457 Impact factor: 1.932