Aminul I Ahmed1, Malik J Zaben2, Nijaguna V Mathad3, Owen C E Sparrow3. 1. Wessex Neurological Centre, University Hospitals Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; Clinical Neurosciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom. Electronic address: a.ahmed@soton.ac.uk. 2. Neurosciences and Mental Health Research Institute, University of Cardiff, Cardiff, United Kingdom. 3. Wessex Neurological Centre, University Hospitals Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the histologic accuracy of endoscopic biopsy samples of the pineal region. Pineal region tumors usually present with acute hydrocephalus. Histologic diagnosis is paramount, as it greatly influences treatment. Endoscopic techniques can combine histologic diagnosis with relief of the obstructive hydrocephalus in a single operation. Because pineal region tumors can be heterogeneous, initial biopsy samples may not represent the most aggressive portion of the tumor. METHODS: This retrospective study reviews our experience of endoscopic third ventriculostomy combined with biopsy of the lesion. The histologic diagnosis as a result of the initial biopsy was compared with the final histologic diagnosis to establish the accuracy of the endoscopic biopsy sample in aiding diagnosis. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients underwent an endoscopic third ventriculostomy. All but 1 patient underwent a concurrent biopsy of the space-occupying lesion and 39 of 46 patients (85%) had a histologic diagnoses. In the remaining 7 patients (15%), the histology was negative; in 6 cases, the second attempt to obtain a histologic diagnosis was successful (2 repeat endoscopic biopsy samples, 2 resections, 2 stereotactic biopsy samples). In 1 patient a presumed low-grade tectal tumor was followed up with sequential scanning. Twenty-eight patients underwent subsequent operations (24 resections, 4 stereotactic biopsies). In 6 of 28 patients (21%), the histologic report was amended after the second procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The endoscopic biopsy sample yields an accurate histologic diagnosis for most pineal region tumors, with a positive histologic sample in about 85% of patients. However, the results must be interpreted cautiously, as the heterogeneous nature of these tumors may lead to an approximately 21% error rate in the initial tumor diagnosis.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the histologic accuracy of endoscopic biopsy samples of the pineal region. Pineal region tumors usually present with acute hydrocephalus. Histologic diagnosis is paramount, as it greatly influences treatment. Endoscopic techniques can combine histologic diagnosis with relief of the obstructive hydrocephalus in a single operation. Because pineal region tumors can be heterogeneous, initial biopsy samples may not represent the most aggressive portion of the tumor. METHODS: This retrospective study reviews our experience of endoscopic third ventriculostomy combined with biopsy of the lesion. The histologic diagnosis as a result of the initial biopsy was compared with the final histologic diagnosis to establish the accuracy of the endoscopic biopsy sample in aiding diagnosis. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients underwent an endoscopic third ventriculostomy. All but 1 patient underwent a concurrent biopsy of the space-occupying lesion and 39 of 46 patients (85%) had a histologic diagnoses. In the remaining 7 patients (15%), the histology was negative; in 6 cases, the second attempt to obtain a histologic diagnosis was successful (2 repeat endoscopic biopsy samples, 2 resections, 2 stereotactic biopsy samples). In 1 patient a presumed low-grade tectal tumor was followed up with sequential scanning. Twenty-eight patients underwent subsequent operations (24 resections, 4 stereotactic biopsies). In 6 of 28 patients (21%), the histologic report was amended after the second procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The endoscopic biopsy sample yields an accurate histologic diagnosis for most pineal region tumors, with a positive histologic sample in about 85% of patients. However, the results must be interpreted cautiously, as the heterogeneous nature of these tumors may lead to an approximately 21% error rate in the initial tumor diagnosis.
Authors: Ehab Shabo; Thomas Czech; James C Nicholson; Conor Mallucci; Carmine Mottolese; Gianluca Piatelli; Didier Frappaz; Matthew Jonathan Murray; Cecile Faure-Conter; Maria Luisa Garrè; Sevgi Sarikaya-Seiwert; Leonie Weinhold; Hannes Haberl; Gabriele Calaminus Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-07-21 Impact factor: 6.575