Mark L Hatzenbuehler1, Katie A McLaughlin2, Ziming Xuan3. 1. Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York. 2. Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. 3. Department of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine whether the composition of social networks contributes to sexual orientation disparities in substance use and misuse. METHOD: Data were obtained from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health), a nationally representative cohort study of adolescents (N = 20,745). Wave 1 collected extensive information about the social networks of participants through peer nomination inventories. RESULTS: Same- and both-sex-attracted youths had higher frequency/quantity of tobacco use in their peer networks than did opposite-sex-attracted youths, and both-sex-attracted youths had higher frequency/quantity of alcohol use and misuse in their peer networks than opposite-sex-attracted youths. Among same- and both-sex-attracted youths, greater frequency/quantity of tobacco use in one's social network predicted greater use of cigarettes. In addition, greater frequency/quantity of peers' drinking and drinking to intoxication predicted more alcohol use and alcohol misuse in the both-sex-attracted group. These social network factors mediated sexual orientation-related disparities in tobacco use for both- and same-sex-attracted youths. Moreover, sexual orientation disparities in alcohol misuse were mediated by social network characteristics for the same-sex and both-sex-attracted youths. Importantly, sexual minority adolescents were no more likely to have other sexual minorities in their social networks than were sexual majority youths, ruling out an alternative explanation for our results. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the importance of social networks as correlates of substance use behaviors among sexual minority youths and as potential pathways explaining sexual orientation disparities in substance use outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine whether the composition of social networks contributes to sexual orientation disparities in substance use and misuse. METHOD: Data were obtained from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health), a nationally representative cohort study of adolescents (N = 20,745). Wave 1 collected extensive information about the social networks of participants through peer nomination inventories. RESULTS: Same- and both-sex-attracted youths had higher frequency/quantity of tobacco use in their peer networks than did opposite-sex-attracted youths, and both-sex-attracted youths had higher frequency/quantity of alcohol use and misuse in their peer networks than opposite-sex-attracted youths. Among same- and both-sex-attracted youths, greater frequency/quantity of tobacco use in one's social network predicted greater use of cigarettes. In addition, greater frequency/quantity of peers' drinking and drinking to intoxication predicted more alcohol use and alcohol misuse in the both-sex-attracted group. These social network factors mediated sexual orientation-related disparities in tobacco use for both- and same-sex-attracted youths. Moreover, sexual orientation disparities in alcohol misuse were mediated by social network characteristics for the same-sex and both-sex-attracted youths. Importantly, sexual minority adolescents were no more likely to have other sexual minorities in their social networks than were sexual majority youths, ruling out an alternative explanation for our results. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the importance of social networks as correlates of substance use behaviors among sexual minority youths and as potential pathways explaining sexual orientation disparities in substance use outcomes.
Authors: Najat J Ziyadeh; Lisa A Prokop; Laurie B Fisher; Margaret Rosario; Alison E Field; Carlos A Camargo; S Bryn Austin Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2006-09-12 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Michael P Marshal; Mark S Friedman; Ron Stall; Kevin M King; Jonathan Miles; Melanie A Gold; Oscar G Bukstein; Jennifer Q Morse Journal: Addiction Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: S Bryn Austin; Najat Ziyadeh; Laurie B Fisher; Jessica A Kahn; Graham A Colditz; A Lindsay Frazier Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2004-04
Authors: Kristi E Gamarel; Ethan H Mereish; Suzanne M Colby; Nancy P Barnett; Kerri Hayes; Kristina M Jackson Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2017-08-04 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: John E Pachankis; Conor P Mahon; Skyler D Jackson; Benjamin K Fetzner; Richard Bränström Journal: Psychol Bull Date: 2020-07-23 Impact factor: 17.737
Authors: Kristi E Gamarel; Christopher W Kahler; Ji Hyun Lee; Sari L Reisner; Ethan H Mereish; Alicia K Matthews; Don Operario Journal: Prev Med Date: 2015-10-24 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Sarah A Marshall; Teague R Henry; Leigh A Spivey; Scott D Rhodes; Mitchell J Prinstein; Edward H Ip Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2019-02-18 Impact factor: 7.830