Kristi E Gamarel1, Christopher W Kahler2, Ji Hyun Lee3, Sari L Reisner4, Ethan H Mereish5, Alicia K Matthews6, Don Operario2. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA. Electronic address: Kristi_Gamarel@brown.edu. 2. Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA; Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA. 3. Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA. 4. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; The Fenway Institute, Fenway Health, Boston, MA, USA; Division of General Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 5. Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA. 6. Department of Health Systems Sciences, College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study examined whether sexual orientation-related smoking disparities in males and females varied by household smoking behaviors in a nationally representative sample of American adults. METHODS: Data were drawn from the 2003-2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, which assessed 14,972 individuals ages 20 to 59years for sexual orientation, current smoking status, and household smoking. Weighted multivariable logistic models were fit to examine whether differences in current smoking status among sexual minority adults compared to heterosexuals was moderated by household smoking and sex, adjusting for covariates. RESULTS: The main effects of identifying as a sexual minority, being male, and living with a household smoker were all associated with a significantly higher odds of being a current smoker. However, there also was a significant three-way interaction among these variables (adjusted odds ratio=3.75, 95% confidence interval: 1.33, 10.54). Follow-up analyses by sex indicated that the interaction between sexual identity and household smoking was significant for both males (AOR=6.40, 95% confidence interval: 1.27, 32.28) and females (AOR=0.43, 95% confidence interval: 0.23, 0.81) but was in the opposite direction. Among males, living with a smoker was associated more strongly with greater odds of smoking among gay and bisexual males, compared to heterosexual males. In contrast, among females, living with a smoker was more strongly associated with greater odds of smoking for heterosexuals compared to lesbians and bisexuals. CONCLUSIONS: Future research is warranted to examine characteristics of households, including smoking behaviors and composition, to guide more effective and tailored smoking cessation interventions for males and females by sexual orientation.
OBJECTIVE: This study examined whether sexual orientation-related smoking disparities in males and females varied by household smoking behaviors in a nationally representative sample of American adults. METHODS: Data were drawn from the 2003-2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, which assessed 14,972 individuals ages 20 to 59years for sexual orientation, current smoking status, and household smoking. Weighted multivariable logistic models were fit to examine whether differences in current smoking status among sexual minority adults compared to heterosexuals was moderated by household smoking and sex, adjusting for covariates. RESULTS: The main effects of identifying as a sexual minority, being male, and living with a household smoker were all associated with a significantly higher odds of being a current smoker. However, there also was a significant three-way interaction among these variables (adjusted odds ratio=3.75, 95% confidence interval: 1.33, 10.54). Follow-up analyses by sex indicated that the interaction between sexual identity and household smoking was significant for both males (AOR=6.40, 95% confidence interval: 1.27, 32.28) and females (AOR=0.43, 95% confidence interval: 0.23, 0.81) but was in the opposite direction. Among males, living with a smoker was associated more strongly with greater odds of smoking among gay and bisexual males, compared to heterosexual males. In contrast, among females, living with a smoker was more strongly associated with greater odds of smoking for heterosexuals compared to lesbians and bisexuals. CONCLUSIONS: Future research is warranted to examine characteristics of households, including smoking behaviors and composition, to guide more effective and tailored smoking cessation interventions for males and females by sexual orientation.
Authors: Megan A Lewis; Colleen M McBride; Kathryn I Pollak; Elaine Puleo; Rita M Butterfield; Karen M Emmons Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2005-09-16 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Kristi E Gamarel; Ryan J Watson; Raha Mouzoon; Christopher W Wheldon; Jessica N Fish; Nancy L Fleischer Journal: Int J Behav Med Date: 2020-04
Authors: Kristi E Gamarel; Torsten B Neilands; Amy A Conroy; Samantha E Dilworth; Nadra Lisha; Jonelle M Taylor; Lynae A Darbes; Mallory O Johnson Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2016-11-18 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Lisa M Christian; Steve W Cole; Thomas McDade; John E Pachankis; Ethan Morgan; Anna M Strahm; Claire M Kamp Dush Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2021-06-05 Impact factor: 9.052