Literature DB >> 25486355

Different fates of oocytes with DNA double-strand breaks in vitro and in vivo.

Fei Lin1, Xue-Shan Ma, Zhen-Bo Wang, Zhong-Wei Wang, Yi-Bo Luo, Lin Huang, Zong-Zhe Jiang, Meng-Wen Hu, Heide Schatten, Qing-Yuan Sun.   

Abstract

In female mice, despite the presence of slight DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), fully grown oocytes are able to undergo meiosis resumption as indicated by germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD); however, severe DNA DSBs do reduce and delay entry into M phase through activation of the DNA damage checkpoint. But little is known about the effect of severe DNA DSBs on the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) during oocyte maturation. We showed that nearly no first polar body (PB1) was extruded at 12 h of in vitro maturation (IVM) in severe DNA DSBs oocytes, and the limited number of oocytes with PB1 were actually at telophase. However, about 60% of the severe DNA DSBs oocytes which underwent GVBD at 2 h of IVM released a PB1 at 18 h of IVM and these oocytes did reach the second metaphase (MII) stage. Chromosome spread at MI and MII stages showed that chromosomes fragmented after GVBD in severe DNA DSBs oocytes. The delayed PB1 extrusion was due to the disrupted attachment of microtubules to kinetochores and activation of the SAC. At the same time, misaligned chromosome fragments became obvious at the first metaphase (MI) in severe DNA DSBs oocytes. These data implied that the inactivation of SAC during the metaphase-anaphase transition of first meiosis was independent of chromosome integrity. Next, we induced DNA DSBs in vivo, and found that the number of superovulated oocytes per mouse was significantly reduced; moreover, this treatment increased the percentage of apoptotic oocytes. These results suggest that DNA DSBs oocytes undergo apoptosis in vivo.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DDR, DNA damage response; DNA double-strand breaks; DSBs, DNA double-strand breaks; GVBD, germinal vesicle breakdown; ICL, interstrand crosslinks; IVM, in vitro maturation; MI, the first metaphase; MII, the second metaphase; PB1, first polar body; PBE, PB1 extrusion; SAC, spindle assembly checkpoint; apoptosis; meiosis; oocyte; spindle assembly checkpoint

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25486355      PMCID: PMC4614914          DOI: 10.4161/15384101.2015.945375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Cycle        ISSN: 1551-4005            Impact factor:   4.534


  26 in total

1.  Adaptation of a DNA replication checkpoint response depends upon inactivation of Claspin by the Polo-like kinase.

Authors:  Hae Yong Yoo; Akiko Kumagai; Anna Shevchenko; Andrej Shevchenko; William G Dunphy
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-05-28       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  Mechanisms of eukaryotic DNA double strand break repair.

Authors:  Dana Cahill; Brian Connor; James P Carney
Journal:  Front Biosci       Date:  2006-05-01

Review 3.  Novel signaling mechanisms in the ovary during oocyte maturation and ovulation.

Authors:  Marco Conti; Minnie Hsieh; A Musa Zamah; Jeong Su Oh
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 4.102

4.  Differential roles of checkpoint kinase 1, checkpoint kinase 2, and mitogen-activated protein kinase-activated protein kinase 2 in mediating DNA damage-induced cell cycle arrest: implications for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Zhan Xiao; John Xue; Thomas J Sowin; Haiying Zhang
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 6.261

5.  Deficiency in the response to DNA double-strand breaks in mouse early preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  Masashi Yukawa; Shoji Oda; Hiroshi Mitani; Masao Nagata; Fugaku Aoki
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 3.575

6.  DNA damage activates ATM through intermolecular autophosphorylation and dimer dissociation.

Authors:  Christopher J Bakkenist; Michael B Kastan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-01-30       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Preferential pericentric lesions and aneuploidy induced in mouse oocytes by the topoisomerase II inhibitor etoposide.

Authors:  J B Mailhes; F Marchetti; G L Phillips; D R Barnhill
Journal:  Teratog Carcinog Mutagen       Date:  1994

8.  Oocytes progress beyond prophase in the presence of DNA damage.

Authors:  Petros Marangos; John Carroll
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  The DNA damage response in mammalian oocytes.

Authors:  John Carroll; Petros Marangos
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 4.599

10.  DNA double strand breaks but not interstrand crosslinks prevent progress through meiosis in fully grown mouse oocytes.

Authors:  Wai Shan Yuen; Julie A Merriman; Moira K O'Bryan; Keith T Jones
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  20 in total

1.  DNA damage in the oocytes SACs.

Authors:  Libor Macurek
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  Casein kinase 1 (α, δ and ε) localize at the spindle poles, but may not be essential for mammalian oocyte meiotic progression.

Authors:  Shu-Tao Qi; Zhen-Bo Wang; Lin Huang; Li-Feng Liang; Ye-Xing Xian; Ying-Chun Ouyang; Yi Hou; Qing-Yuan Sun; Wei-Hua Wang
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.534

3.  Nuf2 is required for chromosome segregation during mouse oocyte meiotic maturation.

Authors:  Teng Zhang; Yang Zhou; Shu-Tao Qi; Zhen-Bo Wang; Wei-Ping Qian; Ying-Chun Ouyang; Wei Shen; Heide Schatten; Qing-Yuan Sun
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 4.  The capacity of oocytes for DNA repair.

Authors:  Jessica M Stringer; Amy Winship; Seng H Liew; Karla Hutt
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 9.261

5.  DNA damage response during mouse oocyte maturation.

Authors:  Alexandra Mayer; Vladimir Baran; Yogo Sakakibara; Adela Brzakova; Ivana Ferencova; Jan Motlik; Tomoya S Kitajima; Richard M Schultz; Petr Solc
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 6.  BRCA Mutations, DNA Repair Deficiency, and Ovarian Aging.

Authors:  Kutluk Oktay; Volkan Turan; Shiny Titus; Robert Stobezki; Lin Liu
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 4.285

7.  Multiple Small Supernumerary Marker Chromosomes Resulting from Maternal Meiosis I or II Errors.

Authors:  Ron Hochstenbach; Beata Nowakowska; Marianne Volleth; Amber Ummels; Anna Kutkowska-Kaźmierczak; Ewa Obersztyn; Kamila Ziemkiewicz; Claudia Gerloff; Denny Schanze; Martin Zenker; Petra Muschke; Ina Schanze; Martin Poot; Thomas Liehr
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2015-10-31

8.  Ageing and ovarian stimulation modulate the relative levels of transcript abundance of oocyte DNA repair genes during the germinal vesicle-metaphase II transition in mice.

Authors:  Fabrizzio Horta; Aravind Ravichandran; Sally Catt; Beverley Vollenhoven; Peter Temple-Smith
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  The role of Rad51 in safeguarding mitochondrial activity during the meiotic cell cycle in mammalian oocytes.

Authors:  Kyeoung-Hwa Kim; Ji-Hoon Park; Eun-Young Kim; Jung-Jae Ko; Kyung-Soon Park; Kyung-Ah Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Role of the Polymerase ϵ sub-unit DPB2 in DNA replication, cell cycle regulation and DNA damage response in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  José Antonio Pedroza-Garcia; Séverine Domenichini; Christelle Mazubert; Mickael Bourge; Charles White; Elodie Hudik; Rémi Bounon; Zakia Tariq; Etienne Delannoy; Ivan Del Olmo; Manuel Piñeiro; Jose Antonio Jarillo; Catherine Bergounioux; Moussa Benhamed; Cécile Raynaud
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.