| Literature DB >> 25486295 |
Rhodri S Lloyd1, Jon L Oliver, Avery D Faigenbaum, Rick Howard, Mark B A De Ste Croix, Craig A Williams, Thomas M Best, Brent A Alvar, Lyle J Micheli, D Phillip Thomas, Disa L Hatfield, John B Cronin, Gregory D Myer.
Abstract
The concept of developing talent and athleticism in youth is the goal of many coaches and sports systems. Consequently, an increasing number of sporting organizations have adopted long-term athletic development models in an attempt to provide a structured approach to the training of youth. It is clear that maximizing sporting talent is an important goal of long-term athletic development models. However, ensuring that youth of all ages and abilities are provided with a strategic plan for the development of their health and physical fitness is also important to maximize physical activity participation rates, reduce the risk of sport- and activity-related injury, and to ensure long-term health and well-being. Critical reviews of independent models of long-term athletic development are already present within the literature; however, to the best of our knowledge, a comprehensive examination and review of the most prominent models does not exist. Additionally, considerations of modern day issues that may impact on the success of any long-term athletic development model are lacking, as are proposed solutions to address such issues. Therefore, within this 2-part commentary, Part 1 provides a critical review of existing models of practice for long-term athletic development and introduces a composite youth development model that includes the integration of talent, psychosocial and physical development across maturation. Part 2 identifies limiting factors that may restrict the success of such models and offers potential solutions.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25486295 DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000756
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Strength Cond Res ISSN: 1064-8011 Impact factor: 3.775